Western University, Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine
London, Ontario, N6G 2M1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03545958
Older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may represent a portion of the population experiencing early sings of cognitive decline. Systolic hypertension is a major contributor to cognitive impairment. High-intensity aerobic interval training (HIT) yields greater fitness and vascular health improvements compared to moderate-intensity aerobic continuous training (MCT). No randomized controlled trials, however, have investigated the effects HIT or MCT on cognition in older adults with hypertension and SCD. Much less is known regarding whether combining HIT or MCT with mind-motor training would culminate additive benefits to cognition. Therefore, the overarching goal of our research is to deliver a group-based exercise program combining mind-motor training with HIT or MCT to older adults with hypertension and SCD. Participants will be randomized into two groups. Participants in both groups will receive 15 minutes of square stepping exercise (SSE) followed by either 45 minutes of HIT (N=70) or 45 minutes of MCT (N=70). In total, both groups will exercise 60 min/day, 3 days/week for 6 months. The effects of both interventions will be evaluated on systolic and diastolic office/ambulatory blood pressure and global and domain-specific cognitive functioning.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London, Ontario, N6G 2M1, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Following the mind-motor training component, participants in the experimental group will then continue in the 45-minute HIT intervention, which will be composed by a 10-minute warm-up, a 25-minute core activity, and a 10-minute cool down. The 25-minute core activity will be carried out based on a 4 x 4 minutes aerobic interval training model. The intensity in each cycle will be prescribed at an individual level, and training heart rates will be determined via a sub-maximal excise testing at baseline and monitored during exercise using a wrist-based heart rate monitor (Suunto). In order to ensure progression in aerobic training over the 6-month intervention, training heart rates will be recalculated at the intervention midpoint (i.e., 3 months), where a new sub-maximal exercise test will be performed. Participants will exercise 60 minutes/day, 3 days/week for 6 months.
After the mind-motor training component, participants in the comparison/control group will then continue in the 45-min MCT intervention, which will be composed by a 10-minute warm-up a 25-minute moderate-intensity continuous aerobic exercise training, and a 10-minute cool down. The exercise intensity will be prescribed at an individual level, and training heart rates will be determined via a sub-maximal excise testing at baseline and monitored during exercise using a wrist-based heart rate monitor (Suunto). In order to ensure progression in aerobic training over the 6-month intervention, training heart rates will be recalculated at the intervention midpoint (i.e., 3 months), where a new sub-maximal exercise test will be performed. Participants will exercise 60 minutes/day, 3 days/week for 6 months.
Time frame: Change from 0 to 6 months
Global cognitive functioning assessment
Time frame: Change from 0 to 6 months
Resting blood pressure
Time frame: Change from 0 to 6 months
Ambulatory blood pressure assessment
Time frame: Change from 0 to 6 months
Cardiorespiratory fitness assessment
Time frame: Change from 0 to 6 months
Executive Functioning assessment
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Composite measure derived from the Cambridge Brain Sciences cognitive battery (Hampshire, Highfield, Parkin, & Owen, 2012). The composite score is derived from 4 cognitive tasks: Monkey Ladder (visuospatial working memory), Spatial Span (short-term memory), Digit Span (verbal working memory), and Paired Associates (visuospatial learning). For each of the cognitive tasks, higher scores indicate better outcomes. The scores from each task are standardized and averaged to generate a standardized composite measure of memory, i.e., z scores with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. The standardized scores can range from negative infinity to positive infinity.
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Composite measure from the Cambridge Brain Sciences cognitive battery. The composite score is derived from 3 cognitive tasks: Grammatical Reasoning (verbal reasoning), Double Trouble (modified Stroop task), and Odd One Out (deductive reasoning). For each of the cognitive tasks, higher scores indicate better outcomes. The scores from each task are standardized and averaged to generate a standardized composite measure of reasoning, i.e., z scores with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. The standardized scores can range from negative infinity to positive infinity.
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Composite measure from the Cambridge Brain Sciences cognitive battery. The composite score is derived from 2 cognitive tasks: Spatial Planning (planning and executive function) and Token Search (working memory and strategy). For each of the cognitive tasks, higher scores indicate better outcomes. The scores from each task are standardized and averaged to generate a standardized composite measure, i.e., z scores with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. The standardized scores can range from negative infinity to positive infinity.
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Composite measure from the Cambridge Brain Sciences cognitive battery. The composite score is derived from 3 cognitive tasks: Rotations (mental rotation), Feature Match (feature-based attention and concentration), and Polygons (visuospatial processing). For each of the cognitive tasks, higher scores indicate better outcomes. The scores from each task are standardized and averaged to generate a standardized composite measure, i.e., z scores with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1. The standardized scores can range from negative infinity to positive infinity.
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Dual-task velocity is measured in centimetres/second and will be assessed via an electronic walkway (GAITRite® System, 420 cm long, 90 cm wide; CIR Systems). Participants will complete: 1) a single-task walking trial at their own pace; followed by two dual-task walking trials: 2a) walking while naming animals (at baseline) or vegetables (at study endpoint) and 2b) walking while subtracting serial sevens from 90 (at baseline) or 80 (at study endpoint).
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Dual-task step length is measured in centimetres and will be assessed via an electronic walkway (GAITRite® System, 420 cm long, 90 cm wide; CIR Systems). Participants will complete: 1) a single-task walking trial at their own pace; followed by two dual-task walking trials: 2a) walking while naming animals (at baseline) or vegetables (at study endpoint) and 2b) walking while subtracting serial sevens from 90 (at baseline) or 80 (at study endpoint).
Time frame: 0 to 6 months
Dual-task gait variability is derived from cycle time variability, measured as the coefficient of variation (%) for cycle time, and will be assessed via an electronic walkway (GAITRite® System, 420 cm long, 90 cm wide; CIR Systems). Participants will complete: 1) a single-task walking trial at their own pace; followed by two dual-task walking trials: 2a) walking while naming animals (at baseline) or vegetables (at study endpoint) and 2b) walking while subtracting serial sevens from 90 (at baseline) or 80 (at study endpoint).
Western University, Canada
Other
Exercise to Improve the Hearts and Minds of Canadian Older Adults With Hypertension: The Heart & Mind Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04384263
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cognition Disorders
Storrs, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03617302
Aging, Arterial Stiffness
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06318390
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cognition Disorders
Arlington, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06245382
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cognition Disorders
Arlington, Texas, United States
View Trial Details