Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05904808

The Heart Failure Diuresis Efficacy Comparison (DEA-HF) Study

To investigate the effectiveness of three (3) IV diuretic regimens to increase natriuresis in volume-overloaded HF patients, allowing for better decongestion and potentially resulting in improved clinical and biochemical parameters outcome.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Rambam MC

Haifa, 3109601, Israel

About this study

The study will assess the efficacy and safety of three (3) different clinically prevailing diuretic regimens. All three regimens are based on furosemide, as mentioned above- a 1st line HF GL2,3 recommended and MOH registered 7 for fluid decongestion, and the two adjuvants medications are also approved as diuretics in HF patients. Better natriuresis will lead to better decongestion in CHF patients with volume overload. It is expected that the better natriuresis will lead to better decongestion, and improvement in favorable markers parameters such as NT pro BNP.

The trial will investigate treatment regimens, readily available, clinically approved ("on-label" in Israel), which can be very easily administered, through an IV infusion or IV and PO administration without additional extra testing or invasive monitoring. The setting is in an established dedicated HF day-care unit at the cardiology department of Rambam Health Campus (RMC)- a tertiary referral academic center.

The knowledge gathered in this study, could be easily adopted by every clinic or hospital in a quick manner with considerable cost-savings with regards to health care expenditure.

Importantly, this study will examine which application of existing decongestive therapies (not novel drugs), based on strong scientific reasoning, will result in a better outcome for patients. Therefore, data from the study will provide information regarding the safety and efficacy of diuretic treatment in the above-mentioned patient population.

The study intends to be a real-life study, in the manner of:

  • Conducted in an established, protocol-operated setting
  • Essential only recruitment restrictions
  • Without any additional testing to the day care standard of care
  • Have minimal or no additional expected risk for the patient (comparison between standard diuretic regimens)
  • Have very clinically meaningful endpoints.

Therefore, this study should be considered a 'Low-intervention clinical trial' as:

  • The investigational medicinal products, which are used in clinical practice and approved, have a very low-risk profile and are well-known to general cardiologists and internists worldwide.
  • According to the protocol of the clinical trial, all investigational medicinal products will be used in accordance with EU and US marketing approval according to published guidelines. Note: from commercial and supply chain reasons oral metolazone and IV acetazolamide are imported by medical institutions in Israel by means of group "29 gimel" form. Both are FDA and EU labeled for HF treatment.
  • No additional diagnostic or monitoring procedures are asked. Hence, minimal additional risk or burden to the safety of the subjects compared to normal clinical practice.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed written informed consent must be obtained before any study assessment is performed.
  • Male or female patients 18 years of age or older
  • Confirmed Diagnosis of Heart Failure (per ESC guidelines 20212)
  • At least one sign of active congestion at recruitment: Jugular venous pressure(JVP)/Ascites/Edema/Pulmonary rales/Pleural effusion/ Lung ultrasound B lines >3 lines (at 6 sites).
  • Patient is at least on two heart failure drugs including: BB, MRA, sGLT2i, ACEI/ARB/ARNI (or has a clinical reason for its absence) and on oral diuretics for the last 30 days before study inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of myocardial infraction in the last 14 days prior to patient randomization.
  • History of a cardiac transplantation and/or ventricular assist device.
  • Mean blood pressure <60 mmHg at screening
  • Simultaneous use of intravenous inotropes, vasopressors or nitroprusside due to acute decompensated heart failure in the last 14 days.
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate <20ml/min/1.73m2 at screening
  • Any circumstances where urine collection is not possible.
  • Use of renal replacement therapy or ultrafiltration 30 days prior to patient randomization.
  • Subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Treatment and study plan

IV Furosemide

Drug

Given over 4-hour drip using IV pump, 40mg of the 250mg will be given as a bolus

IV Furosemide and PO Metolazone

Drug

Given over 4-hour drip using IV pump, 40mg of the 250mg will be given as a bolus +5mg PO Metolazone

IV Furosemide and IV Acetazolamide

Drug

Furosemide would be given over 4-hour drip using IV pump, 40mg of the 250mg will be given as a bolus.

500mg IV Acetazolamide would be given in 100cc of saline over half an hour

Other names: Oral Magnesium citrate 600mg

Primary outcomes

  1. Sodium weight

    Time frame: 1st week visit (time zero)

    Na Weight (Spot Na * total volume of urine)

  2. Sodium weight

    Time frame: 1 week after 1st visit

    Na Weight (Spot Na * total volume of urine)

  3. Sodium weight

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Na Weight (Spot Na * total volume of urine)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Urine Volume

    Time frame: 1st week visit (time zero)

    Total urinary volume starting from initiation of intravenous (IV) therapy for 6 hours

  2. Urine Volume

    Time frame: 1 week after 1st visit

    Total urinary volume starting from initiation of intravenous (IV) therapy for 6 hours

  3. Urine Volume

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Total urinary volume starting from initiation of intravenous (IV) therapy for 6 hours

  4. Rate of symptomatic hypotension events

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    Systolic BP <90mmhg with symptoms

  5. Rate of symptomatic hypotension events

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Systolic BP <90mmhg with symptoms

  6. Rate of symptomatic hypotension events

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    Systolic BP <90mmhg with symptoms

  7. rate of worsening renal function events

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    WRF defined as a >0.3 mg/dL increase in serum Cr, or a >20% decrease in eGFR by the CKDEPI formula

  8. rate of worsening renal function events

    Time frame: 2 weeks After 1st visit

    WRF defined as a >0.3 mg/dL increase in serum Cr, or a >20% decrease in eGFR by the CKDEPI formula

  9. rate of worsening renal function events

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    WRF defined as a >0.3 mg/dL increase in serum Cr, or a >20% decrease in eGFR by the CKDEPI formula

  10. Rate of hyponatremia during treatment phase

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    Hyponatremia <133mmol/dl

  11. Rate of hyponatremia during treatment phase

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Hyponatremia <133mmol/dl

  12. Rate of hyponatremia during treatment phase

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    Hyponatremia <133mmol/dl

  13. Rate of dyskalemia events during treatment phase

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    Dyskalemia defined as <3.5 or >5.6mmol/dl

  14. Rate of dyskalemia events during treatment phase

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Dyskalemia defined as <3.5 or >5.6mmol/dl

  15. Rate of dyskalemia events during treatment phase

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    Dyskalemia defined as <3.5 or >5.6mmol/dl

  16. Rate of metabolic acidosis events requiring NaHCO3 supplements

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    Rate of Metabolic acidosis (requiring NaHCO3 supplements) events

  17. Rate of metabolic acidosis events requiring NaHCO3 supplements

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Rate of Metabolic acidosis (requiring NaHCO3 supplements) events

  18. Rate of metabolic acidosis events requiring NaHCO3 supplements

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    Rate of Metabolic acidosis (requiring NaHCO3 supplements) events

Other outcomes

  1. Change in plasma volume

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    Assessed using weight and HCT

  2. Change in plasma volume

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Assessed using weight and HCT

  3. Change in plasma volume

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    Assessed using weight and HCT

  4. Rate of magnesium deficiency a week after treatment

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    Defined as Mag levels <1.6mmol/dl

  5. Rate of magnesium deficiency a week after treatment

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Defined as Mag levels <1.6mmol/dl

  6. Rate of magnesium deficiency a week after treatment

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    Defined as Mag levels <1.6mmol/dl

  7. Change in body weight a week after each IV regimen

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    weight scale

  8. Change in body weight a week after each IV regimen

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    weight scale

  9. Change in body weight a week after each IV regimen

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    weight scale

  10. Change in BNP level a week after each IV treatment

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    Plasma Nt-ProBNP

  11. Change in BNP level a week after each IV treatment

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    Plasma Nt-ProBNP

  12. Change in BNP level a week after each IV treatment

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    Plasma Nt-ProBNP

  13. Change in decongestion achieved by change in congestion score- week after treatment

    Time frame: A week after 1st visit

    A composite score of: pedal edema, orthopnea, ultrasound evidence of pleural effusion, ascites and B-lines. each getting a rank between 0-4. total score can range from 0-16, where higher score indicates worse congestion and prognosis status.

  14. Change in decongestion achieved by change in congestion score- week after treatment

    Time frame: 2 weeks after 1st visit

    A composite score of: pedal edema, orthopnea, ultrasound evidence of pleural effusion, ascites and B-lines. each getting a rank between 0-4. total score can range from 0-16, where higher score indicates worse congestion and prognosis status.

  15. Change in decongestion achieved by change in congestion score- week after treatment

    Time frame: 3 weeks after 1st visit

    A composite score of: pedal edema, orthopnea, ultrasound evidence of pleural effusion, ascites and B-lines. each getting a rank between 0-4. total score can range from 0-16, where higher score indicates worse congestion and prognosis status.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rambam Health Care Campus

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Diuresis Efficacy in Ambulatory Chronic Heart Failure Patients With Volume Overload- Intra -Patient Comparison of Three Diuretics Regimens

Acronym: DEA-HF

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jun 15, 2023
Registry last updated
May 21, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.