Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00995878

The FIRSTT: Comparing MRgFUS(MR-guided Focused Ultrasound) Versus UAE (Uterine Artery Embolization)for Uterine Fibroids.

The primary goal of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two standard fibroid treatments: MRI guided ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) and uterine artery embolization (UAE). Both treatments are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for women who do not plan to become pregnant.

A second goal of this study is to better understand which symptoms bother women with fibroids the most. Understanding and addressing the symptoms of clinically-significant uterine fibroids is important in order to optimize treatment outcomes and control health care costs.

Women who are eligible to participate in the study, are randomized to one of two treatment arms (UAE or MRgFUS). Women in both arms will receive treatment but will not be able to choose which treatment she will receive.

A comprehensive assessment of symptoms-including experienced pain- will take place at baseline, 6 weeks, and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment with UAE and MRgFUS.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

25 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Uterine fibroids affect up to 70 to 80% of women and about 30% of women are symptomatic. Over 200,000 hysterectomies are performed each year for uterine fibroids in the USA. The direct health care costs attributable to uterine fibroids exceed $2.1 billion annually. Fibroids are reported to cause a number of symptoms including heavy or prolonged menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure, pain with menses and bowel and bladder dysfunction. However, fibroid symptomatology is incompletely understood. Understanding and addressing the myomas pain are important in optimizing treatment outcomes and controlling health care costs from a societal perspective. This study proposes to optimally characterize symptoms and symptom relief in women with leiomyomas severe enough to seek interventional therapy. Secondly we will characterize a variety of symptoms utilizing standardized instruments for other pelvic diseases and symptoms to optimize comparisons with other disease processes.

Clinical and scientific significance of the studies is high. We look to generate resources which can be used at a later time to assess the biologic and genetic variables affecting treatment outcome and to comprehensively assess the societal economic impact of uterine fibroids and their treatment with UAE and MRgFUS.

Participants will be in the study for up to 36 months following fibroid treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women able to give informed consent and willing and able to attend all study visits
  • Premenopausal women at least 25 years of age
  • No evidence of High Grade SIL by pap smears or HPV testing within institutional guidelines.

Exclusion criteria

  • Women actively trying for pregnancy or currently pregnant
  • Uterine size > 20 weeks
  • Prior myomectomy, UAE, or MRgFUS. Previous hysteroscopic or laparoscopic myomectomy for the removal of only pedunculated leiomyomas (as described in #17, below) will be allowed and evaluated on an individual basis to determine eligibility for treatment.
  • More than 6 fibroids > than 3 centimeters in maximal diameter
  • Allergy to either gadolinium or iodinated contrast
  • Implanted metallic device prohibiting MRI
  • Severe claustrophobia
  • BMI which prohibits subject from fitting in MRI device
  • Severe abdominal scarring precluding safe MRgFUS treatment
  • Active pelvic infection
  • Intrauterine contraceptive device in place at the time of treatment
  • Current use of GnRH agonists or antagonists
  • Unstable medical conditions requiring additional monitoring during the procedure
  • Bleeding diathesis requiring medical treatment
  • Imaging suggestive of malignant disease of uterus, ovary, or cervix
  • Imaging suggestive of only adenomyosis
  • Pedunculated submucosal or subserosal myoma with a stalk less than 25% of the maximal fibroid diameter

Treatment and study plan

Focused ultrasound (MRgFUS)

Procedure

MRgFUS treatment will take place in a MRI machine and powerful ultrasound waves go through the abdominal wall to destroy the fibroid or fibroids. No incision is made during this treatment and light sedation is required. There are certain fibroids that may not be treated with this technique and there is no treatment of normal uterine tissue.ough the abdominal wall to destroy the fibroid.

Other names: ExAblate 2000

Uterine artery embolization (UAE)

Procedure

UAE treatment takes place on a regular x-ray machine. A small incision is made where the leg meets the trunk and a small tube is used to use very small pellets to block off the blood supply to the entire uterus. Sedation is used. Most fibroids are treated with this technique and normal uterine tissue is also affected.

Other names: Uterine Fibroid Embolization, UFE

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptomatic outcomes measured by validated instruments

    Time frame: At baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events following treatment

    Time frame: At baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12, 24 and 36 months following treatment.

  2. Biologic predictors of outcome

    Time frame: Blood sample is obtained at baseline and at 12, 24, and 36 months following treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Collaborators

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Registry information

Official study title

The FIRSTT Study: Comparing Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization for Uterine Fibroids

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Oct 15, 2009
Registry last updated
Jan 12, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.