Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07566949

The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (The Fin-UP Trial)

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Manchester procedure and vaginal hysterectomy in treating patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse.

The main question it aims to answer is:

• What is the difference in the success rates at the the two year follow-up

Participants will:

* be randomized in either the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy group and operated as such * visit the clinic at 2 and 5 years after the operation * fill in questionnaires at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after the operation

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Introduction Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition affecting quality of life. Uterine prolapse, a type of apical prolapse, lacks a universally accepted surgical treatment, though vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension (VH) has been the standard for years. Uterus-preserving procedures, such as the Manchester procedure (MP), are gaining popularity due to their less invasive nature and women's preference to retain the uterus. Limited evidence suggests MP may have a shorter recovery time and lower short-term recurrence rates compared to VH, but long-term benefits remain unclear. As most current data comes from observational studies, a randomized controlled trial is needed to reliably compare the effectiveness and patient outcomes of MP and VH.

Methods and analysis The Finnish Uterine Prolapse Surgery Trial (Fin-UP) is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group (1:1 ratio) superiority trial with two arms: (1) the MP and (2) VH. Patients with symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2, and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1 are eligible. The primary outcome is the composite outcome of success defined as the absence of POP beyond the hymen; the absence of bulge symptoms; and the absence of retreatment for POP. Secondary outcomes include anatomical outcomes, pelvic floor symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction, perioperative parameters, and adverse events. Follow-up will take place at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. 426 participants will be recruited, providing 80% power (α=0.05) to detect an 11% difference between groups in the primary outcome, allowing for a 10% loss to follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the trial has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa (ETL-code R25060). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and result in PhD theses. The data will provide important long-term clinical information that will help to unify the very commonly performed prolapse surgery in Finland.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fit for elective vaginal surgery according to standard preoperative assessment
  • Women aged over 18 years
  • No previous POP surgery
  • Symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2 (POP-Q point C ≥ minus 1) and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1. Patients with concurrent anterior or posterior compartment defects will be included.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy or future plans of pregnancy
  • Active malignancy of any kind
  • Contraindications for uterine preservation, i.e. suspected cervical or uterine malignancy, abnormal cervical cytology, abnormal uterine bleeding, a history of endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, or a known hereditary cancer syndrome involving the uterus (e.g., Lynch syndrome). All patients will undergo a clinical examination and ultrasound assessment prior to recruitment. If clinically indicated, a Pap-smear and/or endometrial biopsy will be performed prior to inclusion.
  • Contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy (e.g. extensive intra-abdominal adhesions)
  • Patient's preference for uterine removal or preservation
  • Planned concomitant incontinence procedure
  • Inability to speak Finnish or Swedish, understand the purpose of the study, or commit to follow-up

Treatment and study plan

Manchester procedure

Procedure

The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. The posterior peritoneum is opened if considered technically feasible and clinically appropriate. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The ligament complex is sutured to the proximal part of the anterior cervix. The cervix is amputated using diathermy, and the patency of the cervical canal is ensured. The vaginal epithelium is sutured circumferentially around the remaining cervical stump. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when deemed indicated by the surgeon.

Other names: Fothergill's operation, Manchester-Fothergill procedure

Vaginal hysterectomy

Procedure

The vaginal epithelium around the cervix is circumcised, and the bladder is dissected off the cervix. Both the anterior and posterior peritoneum are opened. The cardinal-uterosacral ligament complex is clamped, transected, and ligated. The uterus is removed in multiple steps by clamps and sutures. The adnexa are checked for abnormalities. Apical suspension is performed using a 0-polyglactin (braided, delayed-absorbable) suture. The suture incorporates the ligament complex on both sides and passes twice through the peritoneum and the full thickness of the posterior vaginal wall, exiting into the posterior fornix and returning through the same tissue layers. The suture is tightened to obliterate the cul-de-sac. In case of a large enterocele, an additional transverse suture may be placed proximally. The ligament pedicles are tied together in the midline. The vaginal wall is closed. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy as well as perineorrhaphy will be performed when indicated.

Primary outcomes

  1. Success at two year follow-up

    Time frame: Two year follow-up

    Success is defined as a composite outcome including

    • the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and
    • the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and
    • the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication).

    Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    7 step Likert scale (Much better - somewhat better - a little better - no change - a little worse - somewhat worse - much worse)

  2. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    Defined by the question "When taking into account all your symptoms related to prolapse, do you consider your current state good enough?" (yes/no)

  3. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20)

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    Questionnaire, 0 to 300, higher is worse

  4. Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12)

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    Questionnaire, 0 to 48, higher indicates better sexual function

  5. Generic health related quality of life measured by EuroQol-5D-5L

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    Questionnaire, 0 to 1, higher is better

  6. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)

    Time frame: 2 and 5 year follow-up

    Anatomical outcomes assessed using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Measurements include points Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C, and D where applicable as well as genital hiatus (GH), perineal body (PB), and total vaginal length (TVL). All measurements are recorded in centimeters relative to the hymen (for POP-Q points) or as linear measurements (GH, PB, TVL). For POP-Q points, negative values indicate positions above the hymen and positive values indicate descent beyond the hymen, with higher values representing worse prolapse.

  7. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 years

    Proportion

  8. Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    Proportion.

  9. Further treatment for associated conditions

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    Proportion

  10. Adverse events

    Time frame: From operation to two months

    Including blood loss >500 ml, bladder or ureter injury, bowel injury, hematoma, need for blood transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, prolonged need for catheterisation, infection, postoperative hemorrhage, need for reoperation due to complication, death, complication with anestesia or other complication. The Clavien-Dindo classification of each complication will be reported.

  11. Operating time

    Time frame: Perioperative

    Minutes

  12. Blood loss

    Time frame: Perioperative

    ml

  13. Insertion of IUD

    Time frame: Perioperative

    Yes/no (MP-group)

  14. Weight of uterus

    Time frame: Perioperative

    VH-group, g

  15. Initiation of antithrombotic profylaxis

    Time frame: Perioperative

    Yes/no

  16. Duration of hospitalization

    Time frame: Days from operation to discharge, assessed at 1 year follow up

    Days spent in hospital, including the day of operation

  17. Duration of sick leave

    Time frame: From operation to last day of sick leave, assessed at 1 year follow-up

    Days, obtained from KELA registry

  18. Long term complications

    Time frame: 1, 2, 5 and 10 year follow-up

    Such as menstrual problems or hematometra, stenosis of the cervical canal, difficulties with uterine access during cervical or endometrial sampling or intrauterine device insertion, endometrial hyperplasia, abnormal cervical findings, malignancy of the uterine body or cervix (MP-group), or other

  19. Success at five year follow-up

    Time frame: Five year follow-up

    Success is defined as a composite outcome including

    • the absence of POP beyond the hymen in any compartment (POP-Q Aa, Ap, Ba, Bp, C (and D for those in the MP group) all ≤ 0;), and
    • the absence of bulge symptoms defined as a negative response to the question, "Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in your vaginal area?" (PFDI-20 question 3 score 0), and
    • the absence of retreatment (surgery and/or pessary treatment for POP indication).

    Participants are classified as having achieved success if they meet all criteria.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anniina Karioja, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+358331165005

Päivi K Karjalainen, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+358142695512

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tampere University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Hospital Nova, Central Finland
  • Kuopio University Hospital
  • Oulu University Hospital
  • Turku University Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Manchester Procedure Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study (The Fin-UP Trial)

Acronym: Fin-UP

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2033
Study completion
2041
First posted
May 5, 2026
Registry last updated
May 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.