The Feasibility and Effectiveness Study for Tele-ultrasonography

The 12 raters are randomly divided into two groups

The raters in group one review the echocardiographies examinations numbered from one to 50 using LCD monitor of ultrasound machine and review the remaining 50 examinations numbered from 51 to 100 using iPhone with CubeView at their first visit The other group firstly review echocardiography numbered from one to 50 using iPhone with CubeView and 51 to 100 with the LCD monitor.

They visit twice with an interval of four weeks and review the echocardiography examinations using revered devices at each session. They also review abdominal ultrasound images on the same plan as reviewing echocardiography.

When they review the echocardiography, the raters measure the ejection fraction by visual estimation (1=obviously normal EF, 2 = probably normal EF, 3 = unsure, 4 = probably reduced EF, 5 = obviously reduced EF). In cate of d the abdominal ultrasound, they are instructed to rate the likelihood of the presence or absence of appendicitis in each case using a five-Likert scale (1 = obvious no appendicitis, 2 = unlikely appendicitis, 3 = unsure, 4 = likely appendicitis, 5 = obvious appendicitis).

Inclusion criteria

• Board certified emergency physicians with a ultrasound experience of 4 years and over.

Exclusion criteria

• Corrected eyesight < 20/30
• Color weakness or blindness