Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT04599335
This study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness for the correction of aging mid-face of treatment group compared with the negative control group.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taipei, Taiwan
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2% HA
Time frame: 6 months
The response rate is a ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) as assessed by the evaluator.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection
The digital image scoring system analyzes the volume change (ml).
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection
Evaluators assess the midface volume deficit scale on site with 5 graded scale, 0 to 5 was represented 'Fullness' to 'Severe concavity'.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection
The response rate is a ≥ 1 Grade improvement on the assessment of MidFace Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) as assessed by the evaluator.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection
Evaluators and subjects assess the improvement of correction with 5 graded scale,1 to 5 was represented 'exceptional improvement' to 'worsened'.
Time frame: Immediate,15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes post-injection
The VAS scale uses a 100 mm line labelled at '0' with 'no pain' and '100' with 'worst pain'.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection
The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-injection
The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
Time frame: Baseline
The safety assessment was based on reports of adverse events, defined as any unwanted events whether it was thought to be related to the study drugs or not, were recorded during each follow up and at any time the patient reported an event to the investigator during the study period.
SciVision Biotech Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04622085
Aging Mid-Face, Dermal Filler
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT04569045
Dermal Filler, Hyaluronic Acid
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05294562
Dermal Filler, Hyaluronic Acid
View Trial DetailsNCT05694286
Dermal Filler, Rejuvenation
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details