Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03142152

The EMPOWER Trial - The Carillon Mitral Contour System® in Treating Heart Failure With FMR

The objective of this prospective, randomized, double- blinded (patient and assessors), sham-controlled clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of the CMCS in treating heart failure with functional regurgitation (FMR).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

A total of 300 subjects will be randomized at up to 100 investigational sites in the United States, Canada, and Europe. Subjects will be randomized into one of two study groups using a 1:1 (Intervention : Control) ratio.

Study subjects who are eligible for this clinical study will undergo a transthoracic echocardiographic examination prior to randomization to evaluate the inclusion criteria associated with the severity of mitral regurgitation. A coronary angiogram will be performed to evaluate the coronary artery anatomy and a venogram to assess the suitability of the coronary sinus/great cardiac vein (CS/GCV) for placement of the Carillon implant.

If the subject meets the anatomic requirements for the Carillon implant placement, the subject will be randomized. Subjects who meet all eligibility criteria will be randomized into one of two study groups (Intervention or Control).

Subjects randomized to the Intervention group will undergo the Carillon implant procedure.

Subjects randomized to the Control group will experience an index procedure similar to the Intervention group (without implant placement) to ensure they will not be able to deduce the group assignment based on the type of intervention or time associated with the procedure.

After the study subjects are discharged, the subjects' primary care specialists (cardiologist/heart failure physician) and clinical investigation site staff will coordinate follow-up evaluations. Subjects will be evaluated at one (1), six (6), twelve (12), eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) months post-randomization, to assess long-term safety, and functional and clinical status.

After the 24-month evaluation, all subjects will be unblinded. All Intervention and Control subjects will be followed with an abbreviated annual contact and echocardiogram for an additional three (3) years, for a total of five (5) years.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Symptomatic heart failure with functional (secondary) mitral regurgitation of at least 1+ (mild) severity
  • NYHA II, III, or IV
  • Six Minute Walk distance ≥ 100 meters and ≤ 600 meters
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≤ 50%
  • LVEDD:
  • ≥ 55 mm (women)
  • ≥ 57 mm (men)
  • LVESD ≤ 75 mm
  • Corrected NT-proBNP > 1200 pg/ml measured within 60 days of randomization, and/or one or more heart failure hospitalizations within one year prior to consent or one or more outpatient visits for intensification of heart failure therapy within one year prior to consent.
  • Optimal Guideline directed heart failure medical therapy assessed by the Central Review Committee
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Carillon implant can be sized and placed in accordance with the IFU
  • The subject has been informed of the nature of the trial and agrees to its provisions, including the possibility of randomization to the Control group and returning for all required post-procedure follow-up visits, and has provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of a mechanical or bio-prosthetic mitral valve or, mitral valve annuloplasty, or leaflet repair device
  • Significant organic mitral valve pathology (e.g., moderate or severe myxomatous degeneration, with or without mitral leaflet prolapse, rheumatic disease, full or partial chordal rupture)
  • Severe tricuspid regurgitation associated with right ventricular dysfunction and enlargement
  • Severe mitral annular calcification
  • Severe aortic stenosis
  • Expected to require any cardiac surgery, including surgery for coronary artery disease (CAD) or valve disease within one (1) year
  • Chronic, severe, medical conditions or pathology, other than heart failure, that will prevent likely survival beyond twelve (12) months or any other medical condition that, in the judgement of the Investigator or Central Review Committee, makes the patient a poor candidate for this study
  • An entire list of eligibility is available in the clinical investigational plan

Treatment and study plan

Carillon Mitral Contour System

Device

The Carillon implant is designed to be deployed, tensioned, and locked in the coronary vein in order to reshape the mitral annulus and thus reduce mitral annular dilation and mitral regurgitation.

Other names: Carillon, Percutaneous mitral valve repair

Guideline Directed Heart Failure Medication

Other

Heart failure medication per ACC/AHA guidelines

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Objective - Freedom from Major Adverse Events

    Time frame: 12 months

    Freedom from a composite of major adverse events (defined as Device Embolization, Vessel Erosion, Cardiac Perforation, and occurrence of cardiac surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention) in the Intervention group is greater than performance goal of 90%.

  2. Primary Efficacy Objective 1 - Hierarchical Clinical Composite

    Time frame: 24 months

    To demonstrate that the CMCS (Intervention) group is superior to the Control group on the hierarchical composite endpoint of death, Cardiac transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned percutaneous or surgical mitral valve intervention, unplanned heart failure hospitalization, change in KCCQ overall summary score, and change in six-minute walk distance at 24 months (analyzed when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up.)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Efficacy Objective 1- Regurgitant Volume

    Time frame: 12 months

    To compare regurgitant volume change relative to control from baseline through 12 months of follow up in patients with at least MR grade 2+ at baseline

  2. Secondary Efficacy Objective 2 - Change in LV End-diastolic Volume

    Time frame: 12 months

    To compare the change from baseline left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) relative to the Control group.

  3. Secondary Efficacy Objective 3 - Change in NYHA

    Time frame: 12 months

    To compare the change from baseline in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification, relative to Control, at twelve (12) months

  4. Secondary Efficacy Objective 4 - Hierarchical Clinical Composite

    Time frame: 12 months

    To compare the first four components of the hierarchical primary efficacy endpoint, relative to Control, analyzed when the last subject completes 12 months of follow up and use all available data up to twenty-four (24) months

  5. Secondary Efficacy Objective 5 - Heart Failure Hospitalizations

    Time frame: 12 months of follow-up, and any available data up to 24 months

    To compare total number of HFH, relative to Control, analyzed when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up and use all available data up to 24 months

  6. Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 1 - Change in Six-Minute Walk Distance

    Time frame: 12 months

    To compare the change improvement from baseline in six-minute walk distance (6MWD), relative to Control, at twelve (12) months

  7. Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 2 - Change in KCCQ

    Time frame: 12 months

    To compare the change from baseline, relative to the Control group, in the Overall Summary Score (OSS) of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), at twelve (12) months

  8. Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 3 - Change in LV End-systolic Volume

    Time frame: 12 months

    To compare the change from baseline in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), relative to Control, at twelve (12) months

  9. Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 4 - days lost due to HFH and CV death

    Time frame: 12 months of follow-up, and any available data up to 24 months

    To compare percent days lost due to HFH and CV death relative to Control, analyzed when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up and use all available data up to 24 months

  10. Exploratory Secondary Endpoint 5 - Alternative Therapies

    Time frame: 12 months of follow-up, and any available data up to 24 months

    To compare the incidence of need for alternative therapy and all-cause mortality (superiority test if HR < 1), relative to Control, analyzed when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up and use all available data up to 24 months

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hank Hauser

CONTACT

[email protected]

(310) 228-0016

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cardiac Dimensions, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of the Carillon Mitral Contour System® in Treating Heart Failure With Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2030
First posted
May 5, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.