Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00332397

The Efficacy of Three Different Limus Agent-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 3 different drug-eluting-stent platforms to reduce coronary artery reblockage after stent implantation

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen, Munich, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Coronary artery reblockage remains still a drawback of percutaneous coronary interventions even in the era of drug-eluting stents (DES). DESs working principle consists of the delivery of controlled amounts of antiproliferative agents at the local level, which results in the suppression of neontimal proliferation, the main cause of lumen re-narrowing after stent implantation.At present, several DES platforms have been developed and evaluated for clinical use. They differ between them with regard to the stent type, anti-proliferative drug, presence of polymers employed for drug storage and modification of drug-release kinetics as well as type of polymer used for this purpose. Most of the DES platforms have used agents from the "limus family". Although the majority of DESs employ polymer coating to control drug storage and release, in view of the increasing safety and efficacy associated with the long-term presence of polymers a strong interest has recently been shown in the development DES platforms that do not require permanent polymers. Trials as ACTION or JUPITER II have demonstrated that not all DESs are associated with the expected improved outcomes. On the other hand, not all successful DESs have been equally effective in the reduction of restenosis. Thus, rapamycin-eluting stents (Cypher stents) have been associated with lower angiographic and clinical restenosis rates than paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus stents). Similarly, Cypher stents have been superior to Endeavor stents regarding the primary end point of late luminal loss in the recent ENDEAVOR III trial. Meanwhile, the on-site rapamycin-coated stents (ISAR stents) had an equivalent antiproliferative efficacy to Taxus stents in the ISAR-TEST trial. However, none of these studies evaluated angiographic restenosis as their primary endpoint and no direct comparisons between the 3 DES -Cypher, Endeavor and ISAR stents, have been performed. The Cypher stent is a stainless steel stent coated with sirolimus with use of permanent polymers while the Endeavor stent is a cobalt alloy based stent coated with zotarolimus which also uses permanent polymers for drug-storage and release. The ISAR stent is a rough surface stainless steel stent that can be coated with sirolimus in the cath lab without requiring permanent polymeric coating.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients older than age 18 ´ presence of ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of ≥50% de novo stenosis located in native coronary vessels written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Target lesion located in the left main trunk or bypass graft In-stent restenosis Cardiogenic shock Malignancies or other comorbid conditions with life expectancy less than one year or that may result in protocol non-compliance Known allergy to the study medications: aspirin, clopidogrel, zotarolimus, sirolimus, stainless steel, or cobalt alloy Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test Previous enrollment in this trial Patient's inability to fully cooperate with the study protocol

Treatment and study plan

Rapamycin-eluting stent

Device

due to randomization, Cypher stent will be implanted

Other names: Cypher

zotarolimus-eluting stent

Device

due to randomization, Endeavor stent will be implanted

Other names: Endeavor

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary end point of the study is the incidence of binary angiographic restenosis at 6-8 month follow-up angiography, measured by QCA in the in-segment area.

    Time frame: 6-8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The need of target lesion revascularization defined as any revascularization procedure involving the target lesion due to luminal re-narrowing in the presence of symptoms or objective signs of ischemia.

    Time frame: 9-12 months

  2. The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction.

    Time frame: 9-12 months

  3. In-stent late luminal loss.

    Time frame: 9-12 months

  4. Incidence of stent thrombosis.

    Time frame: 9-12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Comparison of 3 Limus Agent-Eluting Stents for the Reduction of Coronary Restenosis

Acronym: ISAR-TEST-2

Important dates

Study start
2006
Study completion
2007
First posted
Jun 1, 2006
Registry last updated
Jun 17, 2008

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.