Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200031, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06635967
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of frequency-specific patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and 1Hz rTMS for the treatment of chronic subjective tinnitus. In this single-blind randomized controlled study, patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive two different types of rTMS stimulation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200031, China
Location status: Recruiting
Tinnitus is a common disorder with a prevalence of 10-25% among adults, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients. Many studies have reported significant efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for tinnitus, but its optimal stimulation parameters are not clear. Therefore, there is necessary to assess the clinical efficacy and mechanism of different types of rTMS for the treatment of chronic subjective tinnitus through rigorously designed clinical studies.
The study will assess the severity of tinnitus and the mood and sleep status of the patients through several scales and tinnitus psychoacoustic assessment before treatment, after treatment and at follow-up. The primary research hypothesis is that frequency-specific patterned rTMS will be superior to 1Hz rTMS in reducing tinnitus-related distress.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation will be performed at specific frequencies and inter-train intervals
Low-frequency rTMS will be performed at a frequency of 1Hz
Time frame: 5 days from baseline
The THI questionnaire, widely used in research, including functional, emotional, and catastrophic subscales. It consists of 25 questions, and answers are rated on a "yes" (4 points), "sometimes" (2 points), and "no" (0 points) scale. The total score is calculated by adding up the scores for all questions and classifying the severity of tinnitus as no handicap (0-16), mild handicap (18-36), moderate handicap (38-56), and severe handicap (58-100).
Time frame: 12 days from baseline
The THI questionnaire, widely used in research, including functional, emotional, and catastrophic subscales. It consists of 25 questions, and answers are rated on a "yes" (4 points), "sometimes" (2 points), and "no" (0 points) scale. The total score is calculated by adding up the scores for all questions and classifying the severity of tinnitus as no handicap (0-16), mild handicap (18-36), moderate handicap (38-56), and severe handicap (58-100).
Time frame: 30 days from baseline
The THI questionnaire, widely used in research, including functional, emotional, and catastrophic subscales. It consists of 25 questions, and answers are rated on a "yes" (4 points), "sometimes" (2 points), and "no" (0 points) scale. The total score is calculated by adding up the scores for all questions and classifying the severity of tinnitus as no handicap (0-16), mild handicap (18-36), moderate handicap (38-56), and severe handicap (58-100).
Time frame: 5 days from baseline
Subjective perception of tinnitus loudness will be assessed using the VAS. Participants will be asked to rate the loudness of the tinnitus on a scale ranging from 0 (no tinnitus) to 10 (tinnitus could not be louder).
Time frame: 12 days from baseline
Subjective perception of tinnitus loudness will be assessed using the VAS. Participants will be asked to rate the loudness of the tinnitus on a scale ranging from 0 (no tinnitus) to 10 (tinnitus could not be louder).
Time frame: 30 days from baseline
Subjective perception of tinnitus loudness will be assessed using the VAS. Participants will be asked to rate the loudness of the tinnitus on a scale ranging from 0 (no tinnitus) to 10 (tinnitus could not be louder).
Time frame: 5 days from baseline
The MML assessment quantifies the minimum sound intensity required to mask the perception of tinnitus.
Time frame: 12 days from baseline
The MML assessment quantifies the minimum sound intensity required to mask the perception of tinnitus.
Time frame: 30 days from baseline
The MML assessment quantifies the minimum sound intensity required to mask the perception of tinnitus.
Time frame: 5 days from baseline
Used to measure tinnitus loudness. The level of intensity of an external sound that the patient perceives as equivalent to their tinnitus is used as the LM measurement.
Time frame: 12 days from baseline
Used to measure tinnitus loudness. The level of intensity of an external sound that the patient perceives as equivalent to their tinnitus is used as the LM measurement.
Time frame: 30 days from baseline
Used to measure tinnitus loudness. The level of intensity of an external sound that the patient perceives as equivalent to their tinnitus is used as the LM measurement.
Time frame: 5 days from baseline
Used to measure the duration and intensity of RI for tinnitus.
Time frame: 12 days from baseline
Used to measure the duration and intensity of RI for tinnitus.
Time frame: 30 days from baseline
Used to measure the duration and intensity of RI for tinnitus.
Time frame: 5 days from baseline
The SAS is a concise, validated tool for assessing anxiety levels in research and clinical settings. It comprises 20 items rated on a 4-point scale, summing to a total score indicating anxiety severity.
Time frame: 12 days from baseline
The SAS is a concise, validated tool for assessing anxiety levels in research and clinical settings. It comprises 20 items rated on a 4-point scale, summing to a total score indicating anxiety severity.
Time frame: 30 days from baseline
The SAS is a concise, validated tool for assessing anxiety levels in research and clinical settings. It comprises 20 items rated on a 4-point scale, summing to a total score indicating anxiety severity.
Time frame: 5 days from baseline
The AIS comprises eight items that commonly measure difficulties in falling asleep or maintaining sleep to quantify the presence of insomnia. The higher the AIS score, the lower the sleep quality and mental status. The AIS identifies three types of sleep disorders: no insomnia (score below 4), suspicious (4-6), and insomnia (score between 7-24).
Time frame: 12 days from baseline
The AIS comprises eight items that commonly measure difficulties in falling asleep or maintaining sleep to quantify the presence of insomnia. The higher the AIS score, the lower the sleep quality and mental status. The AIS identifies three types of sleep disorders: no insomnia (score below 4), suspicious (4-6), and insomnia (score between 7-24).
Time frame: 30 days from baseline
The AIS comprises eight items that commonly measure difficulties in falling asleep or maintaining sleep to quantify the presence of insomnia. The higher the AIS score, the lower the sleep quality and mental status. The AIS identifies three types of sleep disorders: no insomnia (score below 4), suspicious (4-6), and insomnia (score between 7-24).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Dongmei Tang, PhD
CONTACT
Shan Sun, PhD
CONTACT
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07017998
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Bozeman, Montana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07711639
Dyssomnias, Ear Diseases
Hualien City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07071480
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03511807
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial Details