Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02086266

The Efficacy of Pilates in the Recovery of Post-prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy between a Pilates exercise program and a Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) protocol combined with anal electrical stimulation (AES) in the recovery of urinary continence (UI) after radical prostatectomy.

There are no studies that evaluate Pilates mat exercises for incontinence in men although it can be assured that this method has the pelvic floor contractions as a principle for practice. If this new therapeutic approach proves to be as effective as described treatment in improving urinary complaints, it will be an option for patients who prefer a non-invasive treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Female Urogenital Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Genital Diseases Genital Diseases, Male Genital Neoplasms, Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Male Urogenital Diseases Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Prostatic Diseases Prostatic Neoplasms Signs and Symptoms Urinary Incontinence Urination Disorders Urogenital Diseases Urogenital Neoplasms Urologic Diseases Urological Manifestations

Age range

50 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

This randomized clinical trial includes 69 individuals with urinary incontinence one month after radical prostatectomy. One physiotherapist, with experience in urogynecology, was responsible for all the assessments. Urinary frequency, nocturia, 24-hour pad test, number of pads used per day, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) were the variables evaluated.

The subjects were allocated in one of two treatment groups (G1: Pilates; G2: anal electrical stimulation combined with pelvic floor muscle training). Volunteers participated of 10 sessions of the corresponding treatment and were reassessed objectively by the number of pads used per day, and subjectively with the score of quality of life.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Volunteers between 50 and 75 years old;
  • Submitted to radical prostatectomy;
  • With complaints of urinary incontinence;
  • That completed one month of surgery;

Exclusion criteria

  • History of incontinence;
  • Transurethral resection of the prostate;
  • Diagnosis of neurological or cognitive impairment;
  • Subjects who were unable to attend treatment sessions, due to distance or physical limitations.

Treatment and study plan

Pilates

Other

PFMT and AES

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the number of pads used per day at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the 24 hours Pad Test at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Change in the International Consultation of Urinary Incontinence- Short Form at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Change in the episodes of nocturia at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Efficacy of Pilates Compared to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Associated With Electrical Stimulation in the Recovery of Post-prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Mar 13, 2014
Registry last updated
Mar 13, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.