Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00462566

The Efficacy of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Pain Control

The objective is to determine if motor cortex stimulation works for the following conditions:

1. Deafferentation facial pain, 2. Upper extremity complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and 3. Brachial plexus avulsion or phantom limb pain.

Each of these groups of 6 patients (total of 18) will be studied independently and all patients will be implanted with a motor cortex stimulation system. They will be randomised to either a regular or low stimulation setting in the two arms of the study. Each arm will last 3 months.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This is a prospective, blinded randomized crossover study comparing two stimulation paradigms in three different groups of patients receiving motor cortex stimulation. The aim of this study is to examine the effectiveness of this modality in a controlled blinded manner, which has not been done in previous studies. There are two primary purposes of this study. The first is to compare two different stimulation paradigms: "high" level stimulation (i.e. stimulator activated 'on' for 10 minutes, 'off' for 2 hours; presumed therapeutic dose); versus "low" stimulation ('on' for 1 minute, 'off' for 6 hours; presumed subtherapeutic dose), in a prospective blinded crossover study design.

The second purpose of this study, is to examine the outcome of MCS in three different pain groups. These are:

  • Unilateral upper extremity neuropathic pain such as brachial plexus avulsion, stump pain or phantom limb pain
  • Neuropathic deafferentation facial pain
  • Upper extremity complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)

Measurements of the effects of motor cortex stimulation will include a visual analogue scale (VAS) of perceived pain, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, SF-36 quality of life questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory-II, the standard 7-point patient global impression of change (PGIC), medications log (verified by pharmacy records) and an employment status questionnaire. Adverse events will be recorded at each visit.

Table 1:

Visit Study Week Standard Care 0a 1b 12c 24d 1a 2e 3f 4g F/Uh Clinic Visit X X X X X X Consent X Surgery X X X Program MCS X X X X X X VAS X X X X X X X SF-36 X X X X X X X Medications Log X X X X Employment Status X X X X McGill Pain X X X X X X X Beck Depression II X X X X Global impression of change X X

  • Screening visit in consideration of MCS
  • Immediate post-op visit, randomization to high or low settings
  • 12 week crossover point
  • Final study visit, MCS programmed at 'best' settings
  • Trial period of MCS, lasting for 1 to 2 weeks
  • Clinic visit to determine efficacy of MCS and removal of temporary external system.
  • Permanent implantation of MCS, if trial was successful
  • Follow-up as required.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis in one of the following three categories:
  • Unilateral upper extremity neuropathic pain such as phantom limb pain, stump pain or brachial plexus avulsion
  • Neuropathic deafferentation facial pain
  • Upper extremity complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
  • Pain is refractory to conservative methods (e.g. medications, regional blocks) as reviewed by a chronic pain clinical physician
  • Patient is considered a good candidate for neurosurgery, i.e. no other medical problems that would preclude surgery
  • Patients who are willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are not considered medically fit for neurosurgery.
  • Patients who have not exhausted conservative methods of pain control, prior to considering motor cortex stimulation.
  • Patients who are not able to provide informed consent.
  • Patients unable to have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Treatment and study plan

motor cortex stimulation

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog scale

    Time frame: 1 month preop, at 12 and 24 weeks postop

  2. SF-36

    Time frame: 1 month preop, at 12 and 24 weeks postop

  3. McGill Pain questionnaire

    Time frame: 1 month preop, at 12 and 24 weeks postop

  4. Beck II depression

    Time frame: 1 month preop, at 12 and 24 weeks postop

  5. Global impression of change

    Time frame: at 12 and 24 weeks postop

  6. Medications log

    Time frame: 1 month preop, at 12 and 24 weeks postop

  7. Employment status

    Time frame: 1 month preop, at 12 and 24 weeks postop

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nova Scotia Health Authority

Other

Collaborators

  • Dalhousie University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Apr 19, 2007
Registry last updated
Oct 18, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.