analyze & realize GmbH
Berlin, 10369, Germany
NCT Number: NCT06083311
Investigate the effect of a probiotic (live bacteria) in individuals with functional constipation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Berlin, 10369, Germany
This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of live bacteria on defecation parameters in individuals with Functional Constipation. The trial will be run in Germany and will recruit adult men and women meeting the ROME-IV criteria for functional constipation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants in this arm will receive a daily dose of 3x10^9 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of a live bacterium, corresponding to 1 capsules daily for 28 days
Participants in this arm will receive an equivalent placebo for 28 days
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS) (total) from baseline (V2) to study end (V3) between verum and placebo groups. Higher scores in the CCCS indicate worse constipation symptoms. (Max score: 30)
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 14
Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS) (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to study end (V3) between verum and placebo groups. Higher scores in the CCCS indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max score: 30)
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score (total) from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max Score: 112)
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 14
Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max Score: 112)
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) domain scores (total) from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL domain scores indicate worse constipation symptoms (varying questions in each domain, each question scored 0 - 4 on Likert scale)
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 14
Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) domain scores (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL domain indicate worse constipation symptoms (varying questions in each domain, each question scored 0 - 4 on Likert scale)
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in (total) reflux questionnaire scores from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Max score 10.
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 14
Difference in (total) reflux questionnaire scores from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Max score 10.
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in (subscale) reflux questionnaire scores from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Each question is a Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Max score is 5.
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 14
Difference in (subscale) reflux questionnaire scores from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Each question is a Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Max score is 5.
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Proportion of stool in each Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) category at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. BSFS categories range from 1 - 7, with 1 representing hard stool and 7 representing liquid stool.
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Difference in change in mean weekly number of bowel movements at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2.
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Difference in change in mean weekly number of spontaneous bowel movements (without assistance/ medication) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Difference in change of the weekly average degree of straining (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Straining calculated on a 5-point Likert Scale, where 1 is no straining and 5 is very severe straining
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Difference in change of the weekly average defecation/rectal pain at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Defecation/Rectal pain calculated on a 5-point Likert Scale, where 1 is no painand 5 is very severe pain
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Difference in the weekly average self-assessment of complete bowel emptying at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Self assessment of complete bowel emptying conducted with a 'yes' or 'no' question
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Difference in weekly average use of laxatives at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
Difference in weekly average need for digital assistance at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3.
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in findings of microbiome assessment using metagenomics techniques of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
Time frame: Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
Difference in findings of targeted metabolomic analysis of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
Time frame: Day 28 (V3)
Percentage of subjects with matching records of blinded assessment concern-ing the IP type they received (verum, placebo) and the actual IP assignment
Time frame: Day 28 (V3)
Assessment of benefit by subject and investigator at V3. 4 point scale, where 1 = poor and 4 = very good
Time frame: Day 28 (V3)
Assessment of the number of adverse events between the intervention and placebo
The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Industry
A Randomised, Triple-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Pilot Study, to Assess the Effect of Probiotic on Functional Constipation and Gut Microbiology
Acronym: SLOG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06196073
Functional Constipation
Denizli, Pamukkale, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06730594
Functional Constipation
Vadodara, Gujarat, India
View Trial DetailsNCT04166058
Functional Constipation, Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05760313
Functional Constipation
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details