Zainab Khan
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT04238208
The study aims to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of using lidocaine 5% patch to 8% capsaicin patch in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Assessment of analgesic effectiveness was assessed by observing any change in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score, average daily pain Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (BPI-DPN Q4) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Assessment of capsaicin and lidocaine safety and identifying treatment adverse effects were secondary endpoints in this study
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–60 year
Male
Interventional
Phase 4
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of using lidocaine 5% patch to 8% capsaicin patch in south Asian male patients with diabetic neuropathy. Assessment of analgesic effectiveness was assessed by observing any change in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score, average daily pain Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (BPI-DPN Q4) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Assessment of capsaicin and lidocaine safety and identifying treatment adverse effects were secondary endpoints in this study
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
5% lidocaine patch (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Malvern, USA) 10 x 14 cm
Other names: Lidocaine patch
8% Capsaicin patch [8% w/w] 640 µg/cm² of adhesive, patch area 280 cm2 (20 cm x 14 cm), (Qutenza®; capsaicin 179 mg patch, Astella Pharma Europe Ltd. Chertsey, UK)
Other names: Capsaicin patch
Time frame: 24 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (BPI-DPN Q4) scores. diabetes at its worst over the past 24 hours").
Each BPI item uses a 0-10 numeric rating scale anchored at zero for "no pain" and 10 for "pain as bad as you can imagine" for Severity, and "does not interfere" to "completely interferes" for Interference.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change score. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. The PGIC was patient-reported, and asked the subject to "indicate how you feel now, compared to how you felt before receiving treatment in this study" on a 7-point scale of -3 (very much worse), 0 (no change), to +3 (very much improved).
Corporacion Parc Tauli
Other
The Efficacy and Safety Profile of Capsaicin 8% Patch Versus 5% Lidocaine Patch in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: a Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study of South Asian Male Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07712289
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07005947
Acute COVID-19, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07394504
Balance, Cognition Disorders
Islamabad, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07436585
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial Details