Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02558231

The Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Versus Initial Dual Oral Combination Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of an initial triple oral treatment regimen (macitentan, tadalafil, selexipag) versus an initial dual oral treatment regimen (macitentan, tadalafil, placebo) in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Royal Prince Albert Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure.
  • Male or female ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age at screening.
  • Initial PAH diagnosis < 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • RHC performed between Day -28 and Day 1, meeting all the following criteria:
  • Mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mmHg.
  • Pulmonary artery wedge pressure or left ventricular end-diastolic pressure ≤ 15 mmHg.
  • PVR ≥ 480 dyn•sec/cm5 (≥ 6 Wood Units).
  • Negative vasoreactivity test mandatory in idiopathic, heritable, and drug/toxin induced PAH (at this or a previous RHC).
  • Symptomatic PAH belonging to one of the following subgroups:
  • Idiopathic.
  • Heritable.
  • Drug or toxin induced.
  • Associated with one of the following: connective tissue disease; HIV infection; congenital heart disease.
  • 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) ≥ 50 m at screening.
  • Women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant, must perform regular pregnancy tests, and use reliable contraception.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any PAH-specific drug therapy at any time.
  • Cardio pulmonary rehabilitation program based on exercise (planned, or started ≤ 12 weeks prior to Day 1).
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2 at screening.
  • Presence of three or more of the following risk factors for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction at screening:
  • BMI > 30 kg/m2.
  • Diabetes mellitus of any type.
  • Essential hypertension.
  • Coronary artery disease, i.e., any of the following:
  • History of stable angina or
  • More than 50% stenosis in a coronary artery (by coronary angiography) or
  • History of myocardial infarction or
  • History of or planned coronary artery bypass grafting and/or coronary artery stenting.
  • Acute myocardial infarction ≤ 12 weeks prior to screening.
  • Stroke ≤ 12 weeks prior to screening.
  • Known permanent atrial fibrillation.
  • SBP < 90 mmHg at screening or Day 1.
  • Ongoing or planned treatment with organic nitrates and/or doxazosin.
  • Presence of one or more of the following signs of relevant lung disease at any time up to screening:
  • Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 40% of predicted (eligible only if no or mild interstitial lung disease on computed tomography).
  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) < 60% of predicted.
  • Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) < 60% of predicted.
  • Known or suspected pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD).
  • Documented severe hepatic impairment (with or without cirrhosis) according to National Cancer Institute organ dysfunction working group criteria, defined as total bilirubin > 3 × upper limit of the normal range (ULN) accompanied by aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > ULN (assessed by central laboratory at screening); and/or Child-Pugh Class C.
  • Serum AST and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 × ULN (assessed by central laboratory at screening).
  • Severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) assessed by central laboratory at screening.
  • Ongoing or planned dialysis.
  • Hemoglobin < 100 g/L assessed by central laboratory at screening.
  • Known or suspected uncontrolled thyroid disease (hypo- or hyperthyroidism).
  • Loss of vision in one or both eyes because of non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).
  • Treatment with strong inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4; e.g., carbamazepine, rifampin, rifampicin, rifabutin, rifapentin, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and St. John's wort) ≤ 28 days prior to Day 1.
  • Treatment with strong inhibitors of CYP3A4 (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, clarithromycin, telithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, and saquinavir) and/or strong inhibitors of CYP2C8 (e.g., gemfibrozil) ≤ 28 days prior to Day 1.
  • Treatment with another investigational drug (planned, or taken ≤ 12 weeks prior to Day 1).
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the 3 study treatments or any excipient of their formulations.
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant during the study.
  • Concomitant life-threatening disease with a life expectancy < 12 months.
  • Alcohol abuse.
  • Any factor or condition likely to affect protocol compliance of the subject, as judged by the investigator.

Treatment and study plan

Macitentan

Drug

Used open-label in both arms, 10 mg tablet, 1 tablet u.i.d.

Tadalafil

Drug

Used open-label in both arms, 20 mg tablet, 1-2 tablets u.i.d.

Selexipag

Drug

Used double-blind in the triple oral treatment arm, 200 microgram tablet, 1-8 tablets b.i.d.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline to Week 26 in PVR was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR value (Week 26 divided by baseline) using re-calculated PVR. PVR was determined by right heart catheterization (RHC). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR less than (<) 1 corresponds to a reduction in PVR from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    The change from baseline to Week 26 in 6MWD was calculated as Week 26 minus baseline. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Levels

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    The change from baseline to Week 26 in NT-proBNP was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP (Week 26 divided by baseline). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP <1 corresponds to a reduction in NT-proBNP from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Absence of Worsening From Baseline to Week 26 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC)

    Time frame: Week 26

    WHO FC is a classification graded from Class I to IV which reflects disease severity based on symptoms. Worsening was defined as death or hospitalization due to PAH. Class I: No limitation of activity; Class II: slight limitation with ordinary activities; Class III: may not have symptoms at rest but greatly limited activities; Class IV: symptoms at rest and inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP) was measured. The pulmonary artery pressure is a measure of the blood pressure found in the main pulmonary artery. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP) was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Pulmonary Resistance

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline to Week 26 in total pulmonary resistance was measured. Total pulmonary resistance was calculated as mPAP/CO*80, where CO is cardiac output. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Cardiac Index

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline to Week 26 in cardiac index was measured. Cardiac index is the amount of blood pumped by the heart, per minute, per meter square of body surface area. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Venous Oxygen Saturation (%)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

    Change from baseline to Week 26 in venous oxygen saturation was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.

  9. Number of Participants With Disease Progression Event

    Time frame: Week 26, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 30, and End of Analysis Period (up to 40 months)

    Number of participants with disease progression event were reported. Disease progression event as adjudicated by the CEC, defined as any of the following: a. Death (all causes; adjudicated for PAH relationship); b. Hospitalization for worsening PAH; c. Initiation of prostacyclin, a prostacyclin analog, or a prostacyclin receptor agonist for worsening PAH; d. Clinical worsening defined as a post-baseline decrease in 6MWD by more than (>) 15 percent (%) from the highest 6MWD obtained at or after baseline, accompanied by WHO FC III or IV (both conditions confirmed at two consecutive post-baseline visits separated by 1-21 days).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Actelion

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

The Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Versus Initial Dual Oral Combination Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multi-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3b Study

Acronym: TRITON

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 23, 2015
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.