Macitentan
DrugUsed open-label in both arms, 10 mg tablet, 1 tablet u.i.d.
NCT Number: NCT02558231
The objective of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of an initial triple oral treatment regimen (macitentan, tadalafil, selexipag) versus an initial dual oral treatment regimen (macitentan, tadalafil, placebo) in newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Royal Prince Albert Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Used open-label in both arms, 10 mg tablet, 1 tablet u.i.d.
Used open-label in both arms, 20 mg tablet, 1-2 tablets u.i.d.
Used double-blind in the triple oral treatment arm, 200 microgram tablet, 1-8 tablets b.i.d.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in PVR was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR value (Week 26 divided by baseline) using re-calculated PVR. PVR was determined by right heart catheterization (RHC). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR less than (<) 1 corresponds to a reduction in PVR from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
The change from baseline to Week 26 in 6MWD was calculated as Week 26 minus baseline. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
The change from baseline to Week 26 in NT-proBNP was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP (Week 26 divided by baseline). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP <1 corresponds to a reduction in NT-proBNP from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Week 26
WHO FC is a classification graded from Class I to IV which reflects disease severity based on symptoms. Worsening was defined as death or hospitalization due to PAH. Class I: No limitation of activity; Class II: slight limitation with ordinary activities; Class III: may not have symptoms at rest but greatly limited activities; Class IV: symptoms at rest and inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP) was measured. The pulmonary artery pressure is a measure of the blood pressure found in the main pulmonary artery. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP) was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in total pulmonary resistance was measured. Total pulmonary resistance was calculated as mPAP/CO*80, where CO is cardiac output. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in cardiac index was measured. Cardiac index is the amount of blood pumped by the heart, per minute, per meter square of body surface area. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in venous oxygen saturation was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
Time frame: Week 26, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 30, and End of Analysis Period (up to 40 months)
Number of participants with disease progression event were reported. Disease progression event as adjudicated by the CEC, defined as any of the following: a. Death (all causes; adjudicated for PAH relationship); b. Hospitalization for worsening PAH; c. Initiation of prostacyclin, a prostacyclin analog, or a prostacyclin receptor agonist for worsening PAH; d. Clinical worsening defined as a post-baseline decrease in 6MWD by more than (>) 15 percent (%) from the highest 6MWD obtained at or after baseline, accompanied by WHO FC III or IV (both conditions confirmed at two consecutive post-baseline visits separated by 1-21 days).
Actelion
Industry
The Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Versus Initial Dual Oral Combination Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Multi-center, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3b Study
Acronym: TRITON
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03893500
Hypertension, Pulmonary, Lung Diseases
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05679570
Hypertension, Pulmonary, Lung Diseases
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT04266197
Hypertension, Pulmonary, Lung Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02845518
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
View Trial Details