Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01079663

The Efficacy and Safety of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Chip (Periochip®) in Therapy of Symptoms in Patients With Peri-implantitis

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and the safety of Chlorhexidine Gluconate chip (Periochip®) versus Placebo Chip in treatment of symptoms in patients with Peri-Implantitis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Department of Periodontology, School of Graduate Dentistry, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a Phase 2a study assessing the safety and efficacy of Chlorhexidine Gluconate chip (Periochip®) versus Placebo Chip in treatment of symptoms in patients with Peri-Implantitis

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed and dated Informed Consent Form.
  • Good general health.
  • Male or female patients aged >21 years old.
  • Availability for the 25 week duration of the study.
  • Peri-implantitis is characterized by the presence of at least 1 implant with periodontal pockets of 6-10 mm in depth (potential target implant) demonstrating Bleeding on Probing without involving the apex of the implant and confirmed radiographically.
  • Females of childbearing potential must be non-pregnant and non-lactating at entry and agree to use an adequate method of birth control during the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of oral local mechanical factors that could (in the opinion of the Investigator) influence the outcome of the study.
  • Presence of orthodontic appliances, or any removable appliances, that impinges on the tissues being assessed.
  • Presence of soft or hard tissue tumours of the oral cavity.
  • Horizontal inter implant distance ≤2 mm (if an adjacent implant exists).
  • Selection of the following dental implant types as target implant/s: hydroxylapatite (HA) and/or Titanium Plasma-sprayed (TPS).
  • History of allergy to Chlorhexidine.
  • Patients treated with systemic antibiotic therapy or periodontal/mechanical/local delivery therapy within 6 weeks prior to study entry and throughout the study duration.
  • Patients treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) within 14 days prior to entry into the study and throughout the study duration (excluding treatment of acetylsalicylic acid ≤100 mg /day).
  • Patients taking Phenytoin, calcium channel blockers drugs (CCBs) and/or cyclosporine, which might influence the pattern of tissue response.
  • Presence of any of the following conditions: Type 1 diabetes, major recurrent aphtae stomatitis, abscesses and related oral pathologies.
  • The presence of any medical or psychiatric condition or any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect the successful participation of the patient in the study.
  • Patient participates in any other clinical study 30 days prior to the start of the study and throughout the study duration.
  • Patient uses Chlorhexidine oral rinses/ mouthwashes on a regular basis.

Treatment and study plan

Chlorhexidine 2.5 mg

Drug

Placebo chip

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) for Selected Target Pocket

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    Pocket depth is the measurement of the distance from the coronal edge of the gingival margin to the base of the pocket. Measurements were taken with a standard 15-mm University of North Carolina (UNC) periodontal probe.

    Change from baseline in PPD was calculated as Week 24 PPD minus Baseline PPD such that a negative difference indicates an improvement in condition

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Attachment Levels (CAL)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    Loss of attachment is defined as the distance in millimetres that the base of the pocket has migrated apically from the gingival margin of the crown. CAL was calculated at the same site that PPD was measured

  2. Bleeding on Probing (BOP)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    BOP was measured at the same site after measuring the PPD. The scoring system used for recording the BOP was a dichotomous one:

    0 = No bleeding

    1 = Bleeding on probing of the pocket base

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dexcel Pharma Technologies Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Mar 3, 2010
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.