Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02080403

The Efficacy and Safety of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Chip (PerioChip®) in Therapy of Peri-implantitis

The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of PerioChip® (Chlorhexidine gluconate chip) in the treatment of patients with Peri-implantitis.

The hypothesis of the study is that PerioChip® in adjunct to mechanical subgingival debridement is more effective in the treatment of peri-implantitis when compared to the common method of mechanical subgingival debridement alone. The primary efficacy measure will be the reduction in probing pocket depth at 6 months as measured at sites of qualifying target implant.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Zentrum für Zahn,- Mund- und Kieferheilkunde Poliklinik für Parodontologie, Giessen, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a research study that uses the drug PerioChip® (active ingredient chlorhexidine gluconate) as an experimental treatment for "periimplantitis". This condition is defined an inflammation affecting the tissues (gums and bone) around an already stable implant, resulting in loss of supporting jaw bone. It is caused by many factors but current research links the condition with the presence of bacteria in the mouth which are responsible for periodontitis (gum disease). If left untreated, this can lead to decreased bone support, weakening of the implant and potential lost of the implant.

Nonsurgical treatment (deep cleaning with instruments to remove plaque) and rigorous diligent oral care at home are commonly used to treat both periimplantitis (gum disease around an implant) and periodontitis (gum disease around teeth).

The medication PerioChip® is a small dental chip (its size is smaller than a match head, and it is completely flat). The chip contains chlorhexidine gluconate, an antimicrobial agent which is not an antibiotic. The chip is inserted into the gum sulcus that is present around the tooth or implant and biodegrades naturally within 7 to 10 days while releasing the medication.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of PerioChip® in addition to a standard deep cleaning treatment regime, as compared to standard deep cleaning alone.in a large patient population, and to collect additional safety data about the treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Good general health
  • At least one implant in the oral cavity with clinical and radiographical signs of peri-implantitis. Including bone loss in combination with bleeding and/or suppuration on probing and a peri-implant Probing Depth (PD) of 5-8 mm.
  • The implants have been in function for more than 2 years.
  • Fixed prosthetic restoration of the implant.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy.
  • Patient uses Chlorhexidine oral rinses/ mouthwashes on a regular basis.
  • Allergic reaction to Chlorhexidine.
  • Active Periodontitis which required definitive treatment.
  • Presence of orthodontic appliances, or any removable appliances, that impinges on the tissues being assessed.
  • Use of systemic antibiotic therapy and/or chronically use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, of any type.

Treatment and study plan

2.5 mg Chlorhexidine gluconate chip

Drug

Subgingival debridement will be carried out for each one of the target implant. Upon completion of the debridement a PerioChip® will be inserted in each one of the target implant.

Other names: PerioChip®

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth for Selected Target Implants

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

    Pocket depth was measured as the distance from the coronal edge of the gingival margin to the base of the pocket. It was assessed at 4 sites per implant: mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual. Only one of the 4 sites, usually the deepest, was determine to be target implant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change in Mean Probing Pocket Depth of Selected Target Implants in Patients With Baseline Pocket Depth Measurement of 6-8 mm Inclusive

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

    Pocket depth was measured as the distance from the coronal edge of the gingival margin to the base of the pocket. It was assessed at 4 sites per implant: mesiobuccal, midbuccal, distobuccal, and midlingual. Only one of the 4 sites, usually the deepest, was determine to be target implant.

  2. Percentage of Selected Target Implants Bleeding on Probing (BOP)

    Time frame: 6 months

    The proportion of the change in bleeding status (bleeding to no bleeding) for the selected target implant

  3. Precentage of Selected Target Implant BOP

    Time frame: Week 16

    The proportion of change in bleeding status (bleeding to no bleeding) for selected target implant

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dexcel Pharma Technologies Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Multi-Center Phase 3 Trial of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Chip for the Use in Subjects With Peri-Implantitis.

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Mar 6, 2014
Registry last updated
Sep 13, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.