Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02519881

the Efficacy and Safety of a Modified Microfracture Using Collagen Compared to Those of a Simple Microfracture in Ankle

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified microfracture using collagen, and to compare them with those of a simple microfracture in patients with cartilage defects in their ankles.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

15 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Bucheon, Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study was an open-trial study. Sixty subjects participated in it. The study was explained to the subjects and they voluntarily agreed to participate in it. Their eligibility to participate in the study was checked, and they were randomized either into the simple microfracture group or the modified microfracture group using collagen based on a randomization table. They were asked to follow the guidelines of the investigators during the study and to visit the hospital five times, including for screening. At each visit, the subjects underwent an examination with doctors and MRI to evaluate the efficacy of the procedure. (*If the subject began the first visit on the screening date, the total number of his or her visits was four.)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who were 15 years old or older
  • Patients with cartilage defects in their ankle
  • Patients with misalignment of their tibia and talus, unstable ligament in their ankle, or bony defects in the lesions of their ankle, and/or who had been treated for alignment
  • Patients or their representative (for adults), or patients and their parent/guardian (for minors), who agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • If patients or their families suffer from or have ever suffered from an autoimmune disease.
  • Patients who have ever suffered an anaphylactic reaction.
  • Patients who have ever suffered hypersensitivity to an implant.
  • Patients with a history of allergy to porcine or bovine protein.
  • Subjects with inflammatory arthritis, such as rheumatoid and gouty arthritis.
  • Subjects with autoimmune disease related arthritis.
  • Subjects who are pregnant and/or breast-feeding and/or plan a pregnancy.
  • Subjects with tumors.
  • Subjects who have undergone radiotherapy or chemotherapy within the last 2 years (Exception: if the possibility of collagen treatment is confirmed with doctor's clinical decision).
  • Subjects who are diabetic. (Exception: if the possibility of CartiFill™ treatment is confirmed with doctor's clinical decision, and/or patient's blood glucose level remains within the normal range and/or no other complications by diabetes mellitus.)
  • Subjects with infections, currently on treatment with antibiotics or antimicrobials (Exception: if the possibility of collagen treatment is confirmed with doctor's clinical decision).
  • Subjects under adrenocorticoid therapy (Exception: if the possibility of collagen treatment is confirmed with doctor's clinical decision).
  • Subjects with psychiatric disorders who are considered inappropriate to participate in this trial by the Principal Investigator.
  • Patients who have ever suffered contraindications of the used Fibrin sealant. (The major contraindications are as follows: patients with hypersensitivity to aprotinin and those treatments for severe brisk arterial or venous bleeding.)

Treatment and study plan

Microfracture

Procedure

simple microfracture of ankle

CartiFill

Device

add collagen when doing microfracture

Primary outcomes

  1. 100mmVAS(visual analogue scale) score

    Time frame: 12 months after the surgery

    The VAS's were evaluated 12 months after the surgery on the affected ankle in the study and control groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change score of 100mmVAS(visual analogue scale)

    Time frame: Screening, 6, 12, and 24months after surgery

    The difference in the 100mmVAS on the affected ankle at the screening and after 12 months was compared in the study and control group, as were the differences in the 100mmVAS after 6, and 24 months.

  2. Change of Satisfaction evaluation by patients

    Time frame: Screening, 6, 12, and 24months after surgery

    The improvements in the affected ankle before and 12 months after the surgery (and six and 24 months after the surgery) were compared in the study and control group.

  3. Change of AOFAS(American orthopaedic foot & ankle society) Score

    Time frame: Screening, 6, 12, and 24months after surgery

    The difference in the AOFAS on the affected ankle at the screening and after 12 months was compared in the study and control group, as were the differences in the AOFAS after 6, and 24 months.

  4. Change of Hannover Score

    Time frame: Screening, 6, 12, and 24months after surgery

    The difference in the Hannover Score on the affected ankle at the screening and after 12 months was compared in the study and control group, as were the differences in the Hannover Score after 6, and 24 months.

  5. Change of Satisfaction evaluation by physician in charge

    Time frame: Screening, 6, 12, and 24months after surgery

    The improvements in the affected ankle before and 12 months after the surgery (and six and 24 months after the surgery) were compared in the study and control group.

  6. Change results of Arthroscopy (ICRS(International Cartilage Repair Society))

    Time frame: before and 24 months after the surgery

    The conditions of the affected ankle before and 24 months after the surgery were recorded and the ICRS's were evaluated in the study and control group.

    • Arthroscopy was performed in up to 10 subjects who signed the consent form.
  7. the result of MRI(mMOCART)

    Time frame: 24 months after the surgery

    The conditions of the affected ankle 24 months after the surgery were recorded and the mMOCART were evaluated in the study and control group.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cellontech Co., Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

This Clinical Trial Evaluated the Efficacy and Safety of a Modified Microfracture Using Collagen Compared to Those of a Simple Microfracture in Patients With Cartilage Defects in Their Ankles.

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 11, 2015
Registry last updated
Apr 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.