Transnasal Endoscopy
ProcedureExperimental procedure with transnasal endoscopy for the first 80% of the patients (n=90). The examination is limited to the esophagus and the proximal stomach.
Other names: EG530N; Fujinon, Fujifilm, Valhalla, NY
NCT Number: NCT02498041
This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy, safety and acceptability of transnasal endoscopy (TNE) for a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE). This is a cross-over randomised trial, whereby patients receive two endoscopic procedures 2-4 weeks apart and will be randomised to receive either TNE or standard endoscopy followed by the other procedure.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Background: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has drammatically increased in the Western World in the last 30 years. Furthermore it often presents in the late stages and the prognosis remains poor with an overall 5-year survival of 10-15%. Early detection is possible since most cases of EAC develop from a precursor condition, Barrett's esophagus (BE), via a metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence. BE can be diagnosed with an upper GI endoscopy.
Un-sedated trans-nasal endoscopy (TNE) may be safer and less expensive than standard endoscopy (SE) for detecting BE. Emerging technologies require robust evaluation before routine use.
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and acceptability of TNE in diagnosing BE compared with those of SE.
Design:Prospective, randomized, crossover study
Setting:Single, tertiary-care referral center.
Patients: patients with BE or those referred for diagnostic assessment will be enrolled consecutively .
Intervention: All patients will undergo TNE followed by SE or the reverse. Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, short-form questionnaires, a visual analogue scale, and a single question addressing preference for endoscopy type will be administered.
Main Outcome Measurements: Diagnostic accuracy for BE and tolerability of TNE and SE.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrathin endoscopy in diagnosing BE (using standardised endoscopic and histopathological criteria) compared with the gold standard white light conventional endoscopy.
The secondary aims include to assess the acceptability, optical quality and safety of the two interventions.
The study will consist of two phases. In a first large phase 80% of the target (90 patients) we will evaluate conventional TNE (Fujinon). In a second phase the remaining of the patients (25) will be evaluated with a disposable office-based system (Endosheath).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Experimental procedure with transnasal endoscopy for the first 80% of the patients (n=90). The examination is limited to the esophagus and the proximal stomach.
Other names: EG530N; Fujinon, Fujifilm, Valhalla, NY
Experimental procedure with portable, disposable transnasal endoscopy for the last 20% of patients only (n=25). The examination is limited to the esophagus and the proximal stomach.
Other names: Endosheath; Vision® Sciences, Inc, New York, USA
Upper GI endoscopy with standard gastroscope.
Other names: Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy
2 research biopsies taken if endoscopic evidence of columnar-lined esophagus
Other names: Research biopsies
Time frame: 2 weeks
Sensitivity and specificity for detecting BE using ultrathin endoscopy when compared to gold standard conventional endoscopy will be calculated along with 95% Pearson-Clopper confidence intervals.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Interobserver agreement for an endoscopic diagnosis of BE by different endoscopic interventions. The optical quality of ultrathin endoscopy will be compared with conventional endoscope by using a 10-cm VAS, where 10 is excellent and 0 is poor.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Yield of intestinal metaplasia in the biopsies taken at both procedures. The presence of intestinal metaplasia in research biopsies taken using ultrathin endoscopy will be compared with standard endoscopy.
Time frame: 12 weeks
The overall acceptability for each procedure will be measured by State-Trait Anxiety inventory, Visual Analogue Scale and SF6 and the choice of procedure in future.
Time frame: 1 week
Any adverse events reported by the patient in the week following the procedure
University of Cambridge
Other
Study to Compare the Efficacy and Patient Tolerance of Ultrathin Nasal Endoscopy to Detect Barrett's Esophagus Compared With Conventional Endoscopy to Inform a Future Multicentre Screening Trial
Acronym: NOSE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04880044
Barrett Esophagus, Barrett's Esophagus
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04408105
Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Barrett Esophagus
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02534233
Barrett Esophagus, Barrett's Esophagus
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05965921
Barrett Esophagus, Barrett's Esophagus
Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details