Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07668440

The Effects, Usability, Satisfaction, Barriers, and Benefits of a Remote, Multidomain Website-based Intervention to Prevent Cognitive Decline in Older Adults

Mexico exhibits a high prevalence of dementia, exceeding 8%, and it is estimated that by 2050 around 3.5 million older adults will be living with this condition. In light of this scenario, addressing factors associated with dementia development through preventive strategies is a priority, particularly through multicomponent programs that integrate physical activity, cognitive training, and other lifestyle-modification components, implemented early before the onset of clinical symptoms. To expand access to this type of intervention for older adults with limited time or resources for in-person care, remote preventive programs delivered by digital media have been launched. Web platforms constitute an accessible and cost-effective alternative for delivering complex interventions, such as the "Mind and Movement for Cognitive Health (MeMo-Salud-Cog)" program, which is designed to promote lifestyles conducive to cognitive health and has shown promising preliminary results in overall cognitive function, memory, executive function, and attention.

However, the use of digital systems by older adults may be limited by barriers associated with aging (cognitive, sensory, physical, and motivational), as well as social factors (education and social isolation) or cultural factors (beliefs and perceived usefulness), which can affect the continuity of their participation. In this context, the present proposal suggests adapting the MeMo-Salud-Cog program to a remote modality, through a website and remote monitoring by healthcare professionals, with the aim of evaluating its feasibility based on usability, satisfaction, effect, and adherence, as well as analysing perceived acceptability, with an emphasis on the barriers and benefits of remote intervention. The investigators will employ a mixed design combining quantitative and qualitative methods, with a pre-post evaluation without a control group in the quantitative part and semi-structured interviews in the qualitative part (pilot study). The study population will consist of independent individuals aged 60 to 75 years affiliated with IMSS at Family Medicine Units 1 and 28, with or without cognitive complaints but without impairment (MMSE ≥ 24), with functional independence, at least one vascular risk factor, a mobile phone or computer, and a signed informed consent form.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

60 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Avenida Cuahutémoc 330

Mexico City, 06401, Mexico

Location contact

Jessica Camacho-Ruíz, M.Sc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55 2227089824

Jessica Camacho-Ruíz, M.Sc

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Rosalinda Sánchez Arenas, Ph in Epidemiology

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rosalinda Sánchez-Arenas, Ph in Epidemiology

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55 5523347589 ext. 21074

About this study

  • Introduction. In Mexico, dementia represents a significant public health problem due to its high and continually growing prevalence, especially in rural areas. This situation is linked to a high prevalence of factors associated with the development of dementia, a characteristic common to other middle- and low-income countries, where prevalence and incidence have not decreased as they have in high-income countries. Dementia has significant implications for individuals, their families, and healthcare systems. In older adults, dementia manifests as memory loss, alterations in thinking, behavioral changes, and difficulties in performing daily activities, which affect their autonomy and independence. The dependency associated with cognitive decline represents a significant economic burden for families, as approximately 80% of total costs are related to ongoing care, a burden that particularly affects informal caregivers. Furthermore, constant caregiving can have negative effects on caregivers' personal, professional, and emotional lives, with women bearing the greatest burden, providing nearly 70% of caregiving hours. In turn, dependency due to cognitive decline significantly increases the demand for, and costs of, emergency and hospitalization services. In various clinical trials, multicomponent interventions have been developed to reduce dementia-related risk factors through a multidisciplinary approach. However, the complexity of these programs has led to the integration of digital systems to facilitate their implementation and monitoring. Digital media offer an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of health interventions by reducing geographical barriers, expanding accessibility, and promoting ongoing engagement. However, in older adults, use of these systems is limited by cognitive, sensory, physical, and motivational obstacles associated with aging, as well as by health complications related to chronic illness. Cognitive difficulties-such as deterioration of working memory, prospective memory, and procedural memory, along with attention problems and slower processing speed-complicate understanding and efficient use of digital interfaces. Additionally, there are sensory limitations, especially visual ones, and physical restrictions related to motor skills that affect interaction with devices. These barriers can be intensified by motivational factors, particularly when the perceived usefulness of technology or its benefits is not evident, potentially leading to frustration and abandonment of the intervention. Therefore, in health interventions involving digital systems, it is crucial to assess their impact on cognitive function while taking usability and satisfaction into account. This ensures simple interfaces, immediate feedback, and smooth navigation, helping to identify barriers and benefits, with the aim of offering an effective remote preventive option. It is important to emphasize that quantitative instruments do not always accurately capture participants' expectations, perceived barriers and benefits, or potential strategies for improvement. In this context, the program "Mind and Movement for Cognitive Health (MeMo-Health-Cog)" was developed as a multicomponent intervention aimed at older adults without dementia in primary care. It combines aerobic physical activity and cognitive training using a grid mat, with the goal of promoting lifestyles that prevent cognitive decline and improve mental health. Preliminary results show improvements in overall cognitive function and decreased depression among older adults; studies still in the process of publication have also observed improvements in memory, executive function, and attention. The intervention has now been adapted to a web platform for remote delivery. In this pilot study, primary outcome variables will be measured, including the impact on subjective, objective, and specific cognitive function, along with adherence. Secondary variables, such as usability and satisfaction, will also be evaluated. Additionally, perceptions of acceptability will be examined, with an emphasis on the barriers and benefits of the remote intervention.
  • Overall objective. To evaluate the effect, usability, satisfaction, barriers, and preliminary benefits of the remote multicomponent intervention supported by a website, over three months, for the prevention of cognitive decline in older adults from Family Medicine Units No. 1 and 28, with follow-up at three months (t3).
  • Specific objectives. a) To evaluate the preliminary effect of the remote multicomponent intervention supported by a website on the primary outcome variables (subjective, objective, and specific cognitive function, and adherence) in older adults from Family Medicine Unit No. 28, with follow-up at three months (t3). b) To evaluate secondary variables - usability and satisfaction with the Mx MAUQ questionnaire - for the remote multicomponent intervention supported by a website in older adults from Family Medicine Unit No. 28, with follow-up at one month (t1) and three months (t3). c) To identify secondary qualitative variables (barriers and benefits) of the remote multicomponent intervention supported by a website in older adults from Family Medicine Unit No. 28 at the end of the intervention (t3).
  • Study design: The investigators will employ a mixed quantitative and qualitative design, with pre- and post-evaluations in the quantitative component and semi-structured interviews in the qualitative component (pilot study). This is a trial without a control group, as one is not required for a pilot study. The study population consists of IMSS beneficiaries affiliated with Family Medicine Units 1 and 28 in Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Hypotheses. a) It is expected that a multi-component remote intervention, supported by a website, over three months, will improve subjective, objective, and specific cognitive function in older adults, with effect sizes of 0.20 and 0.40, respectively, and an adherence rate of 70% at three months from the start of intervention (specific objective 1). b) It is expected that a multicomponent remote intervention, supported by a website, will achieve high satisfaction and usability among older adults at one month and at three months post-implementation (specific objective 2).
  • Sample size (quantitative part). Considering Viechtbauer's theoretical proposal for a pilot study, which recommends a minimum sample size of 59 participants, and accounting for a 20% dropout rate, the final sample size is 71 participants. For the qualitative part, 20 older adults will be interviewed:10 men and 10 women. Among the men, 5 will have high adherence to the intervention (≥70%), and 5 will have low adherence (<70%); similarly, for the women, 5 with high adherence and 5 with low adherence will be included.
  • Website Development Process. The website's content was created over five rounds of sessions. Six experts contributed to defining the topics, with a coordinator acting as a liaison between the specialists and the systems engineers. An external reviewer from the development team also took part. All contributors had experience with cognitive decline in older adults. In the first round, experts identified the key dimensions. In the second, after establishing these dimensions, subdimensions were requested through further inquiry. The third round involved the experts developing the website's content on each topic. In the fourth round, each topic was presented for feedback, with the researchers providing comments and suggestions. The fifth round included a review by an external expert, whose feedback was recorded for subsequent revisions.
  • Implementation of the intervention. a) Prior training will last between three and four weeks, depending on learning difficulty, and will be conducted three days a week, with each session lasting one and a half hours. Each group will have up to 10 older adults. Training will be facilitated by a support team consisting of a nurse and a gerontologist, both previously trained. Participants and caregivers will also be provided with supplementary materials, including a grid mat for cognitive training, a watch to measure heart rate, a guide brochure for using the website, and the instructor's contact information to resolve any questions. b)The three-month intervention will provide remote support through daily morning Zoom sessions. During these sessions, the support instructor will reinforce safety by allowing access only to registered participants: all participants will be asked to identify themselves using their reference number and without a profile photo; anyone who joins with a photo will be placed in a waiting room until they provide their reference number. Zoom sessions may be suspended if a participant violates safety rules. When necessary, personalized feedback will be provided through WhatsApp messages, and participants may call or message the instructors with any questions. Participants must complete at least three routines per week to meet the recommendation of 150 minutes of physical activity per week for older adults.
  • Assessments will be conducted in person at baseline, one month, and three months at the National Medical Center Siglo XXI. These evaluations will be carried out by trained research personnel with expertise in gerontology, nursing, or general medicine, and each session will last approximately one and a half hours. After the study, the principal investigator will conduct the qualitative interviews. These interviews will be audio-recorded, and participants' identities will remain confidential and will be replaced by file numbers.
  • Adverse Events. The type (e.g., dizziness, pain, fatigue, muscle strains, falls, or injuries), number, and severity of adverse events will be recorded during exercise sessions and throughout the rest of the intervention period. Severity will be classified as follows: mild (does not affect daily activities); moderate (has a moderate effect on daily activities); and severe (requires hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability, or constitutes a medically important or life-threatening condition). The study investigators will review all adverse events weekly. They will report all moderate and severe adverse events to the IMSS Ethics Committee and will halt the study if the data indicate any health risk to the older adult participants.
  • Motivation and Adherence Strategies. To improve adherence and reduce dropout among older adults in the program, participants who do not access the application for one week will receive individual reminder messages via WhatsApp encouraging use of the application and the program's physical exercise component. If an older adult still has not used the application after a further week of WhatsApp reminders, a phone call will be made to understand the reasons for non-use and to encourage continued participation. Additionally, participants may contact the study team by phone or private WhatsApp message with any questions, comments, or technical issues.
  • Covariates. The study covariates include participant demographic and clinical characteristics: age (years since birth); biological sex (male or female); formal educational attainment (years); current employment status (retired, employed, volunteer, unpaid worker, unemployed); marital status (married, widowed, divorced, single, other); current living situation (living alone, living with a spouse, living with children, or living without children); and self-reported comorbidities relevant to this study (e.g., vascular risk factors, orthopedic conditions, etc.).
  • Data Management and Confidentiality. Data entry will be conducted by trained staff. Data quality will be assessed before statistical analysis (eg, range checks for data values). Only members of the study team will have access to study information, and all information collected from participants will be kept private to ensure confidentiality. Consent forms bearing participant signatures will be stored in a locked location accessible only to the principal investigator (PI). All electronic data will be stored on the PI's laptop and on a password-protected backup hard drive. Any handwritten materials, such as field notes or other related research documents, will be stored and secured in a locked cabinet when not in use. Data will be erased and destroyed after 5 years, in accordance with IMSS Ethics and Research Committee guidelines. Only deidentified data will be used for reporting, publication, and dissemination of findings.
  • Statistical Analysis, 14.1. Quantitative Analysis. a) Descriptive analysis: continuous variables with a normal distribution will be reported as mean and standard deviation; variables without a normal distribution will be reported as median and interquartile range. b) Imputation of missing data: if the amount of missing data exceeds 20%, mixed linear models will be used for the main analysis. Missing data will be generated using at least five multiple-imputation methods and, to reflect more realistic scenarios, incomplete observations will also be included. Finally, a sensitivity analysis will be conducted to verify the stability of the results. c) Primary outcome: to assess how the intervention groups change over time, a repeated-measures ANOVA with two factors (time and group) will be conducted. Where significant, post hoc tests with adjustments for multiple comparisons (including covariates) will be used to identify specific differences between evaluation points and groups. Results will be reported as point estimates, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values, with p < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. d) Secondary outcome: McNemar's test will be used to compare baseline proportions (t0) with those at 1 month (t1) and at 3 months (t3). If the numerical variables in the study do not follow a normal distribution, as confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test, the medians of the pre-test (baseline) and post-test (t1 and t3) scores will be compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (paired data). A p-value of ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Additionally, a multivariate analysis will be conducted using a generalized linear model to adjust for covariates, reporting 95% confidence intervals and p-values; p < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analysis will be performed using STATA 19 and SPSS 27.
  • 2 Qualitative Analysis. Interviews will be examined through inductive thematic analysis. Three researchers experienced in health services and systems research will independently review, code, and interpret the transcripts. They will then compare their decisions on emerging themes and response classifications to ensure consistency and reliability, resolving any disagreements through discussion and consensus. The researchers will first identify categories and themes from the data; these findings will later be interpreted within the framework of the Health Belief Model to explore perceptions of change and non-change. Interviews will follow a study guide, and participants' demographic variables-such as age, sex, education, and adherence-will be documented. Data management and organization will be handled with ATLAS.ti software.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • With and without cognitive complaints (i.e., they have responded 'yes' to the question: 'Do you feel that your memory or learning abilities have worsened recently?").
  • They demonstrate independence in activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. • With one or more vascular risk factors (for example, type 2 diabetes or hypertension).
  • With a score on the overall cognitive function test of≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination.
  • With a score between 0-4 on the Blessed Dementia Scale.
  • With a mobile phone or computer.
  • Have a companion, such as a child, spouse, or friend, who can support you during the assessment in case of an emergency.
  • Voluntary acceptance to participate in the study through a signed informed consent form prior to your participation.

Exclusion criteria

  • Depression (score > 15 according to the Epidemiological Studies Center Depression Scale - Revised [CESD-R]).
  • With a clinical diagnosis of any significant neurological or psychiatric disorder (for example, Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia).
  • With any heart disease.
  • Presence of a recent cancer diagnosis.
  • History of recent severe cardiovascular event (for example, myocardial infarction, stroke).
  • Significant orthopedic conditions (for example, severe osteoarthritis).
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure (very high > 180/100 mmHg or very low < 100/60 mmHg).
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment.
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus requires insulin to control hyperglycemia.

Treatment and study plan

Multi-domain intervention: Physical activity, cognitive training, and educational program through a website

Other

MeMo- Health- Cog Remote is a Multidomain intervention lasting 60 minutes, comprising 30 minutes of aerobic exercise, 20 minutes of cognitive training, and 5 minutes each for warm-up and cool-down. It is delivered at least three times weekly for 12 weeks. The weekly educational topic can also be reviewed on the same page, covering subjects such as active aging, healthy eating, and socialization.

Participants access the program through a website, with options to watch the videos on TV.

Primary outcomes

  1. Subjective cognitive enhancing.

    Time frame: Measurements will be taken on Day 0 and Month 3. The difference between these two will be calculated.

    Through a questionnaire, the subjective memory complaint will be assessed by responding positively (≥1) or negatively (≤0) to questions such as: Do you feel you have trouble remembering things? Do you forget conversations? Do you repeat the same questions several times? Have you recently forgotten to turn off the stove? Do you think you have memory problems? Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

  2. Cognitive enhancers-global-MoCA

    Time frame: Measurements will be taken on Day 0 and Month 3. The difference between these two will be calculated.

    The assessment will be conducted using: a) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which scores from 0 to 30 points, and higher scores indicate a better outcome.

  3. Cognitive enhancers-psycological (executive function and mental flexibility)

    Time frame: Measurements will be taken on Day 0 and Month 3. The difference between these two will be calculated.

    Executive function and mental flexibility will be assessed using the Trail Making Tests, Part A and Part B (TMT-A and TMT-B). The results of these tests are expressed as the time, in seconds, each task takes to complete. Processing speed, measured with the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), will be determined by the total number of correct number matches (higher scores indicate better performance). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. And symbols achieved in 90 seconds (higher scores mean a worse outcome).

  4. Cognitive enhancers-global-Blessed

    Time frame: Measurements will be taken on Day 0 and Month 3. The difference between these two will be calculated.

    The Blessed Dementia Scale (Spanish version) comprises three sections: i) changes in daily activities (8 questions), ii) changes in habits (3 questions), and iii) changes in personality, interests, and impulses (11 questions), with a total score ranging from 0 to 28 (higher scores mean worse outcome).

  5. Cognitive enhancers-psychological (memory)

    Time frame: Measurements will be taken on Day 0 and Month 3. The difference between these two will be calculated.

    Everyday memory will be evaluated with the Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT). This test uses a scale from 0 to 12 points, based on subtests that cover: recalling names, personal objects, and appointments; recognizing images and faces; recalling stories, routes, and messages immediately and after a delay; and orientation and date (higher scores indicate a better outcome).

  6. Cognitive enhancers-psychological (verbal fluency)

    Time frame: Measurements will be taken on Day 0 and Month 3. The difference between these two will be calculated.

    Verbal fluency (including semantic, animal naming, and phonetic fluency) will be assessed using the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA). It will be determined by the total number of words identified in each category and letter (higher scores indicate a better outcome).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Digital usability

    Time frame: Measurements will be collected at 1 and 3 months, and the difference between the two assessments will be calculated.

    The measure of how efficiently, easily, and satisfactorily users can accomplish their goals on a website is assessed using the Spanish version of the usability questionnaire for interactive applications (Mx-MAUQ, in English). It consists of 21 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree), divided into three areas: (1) ease of use and satisfaction (8 items); (2) system information arrangement (6 items); and (3) usefulness (7 items). The overall score is calculated by summing all item scores and dividing by the total number of items (11). Higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Other outcomes

  1. Perception of the risk and severity of memory decline or loss.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

    Semi-structured qualitative questions (Health Belief Model): What does the reduction or permanent loss of memory imply or mean to you? and Do you know anyone who has lost their memory? How would you rate this situation and why?

  2. Perception of barriers to intervention.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks.

    Semi-structured qualitative questions (Health Belief Model): What have been the barriers that have made it difficult for you to participate in the program and maintain commitment to the recommended activities?

  3. Perception of benefits and suggestions to intervention.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks.

    Semi-structured qualitative questions (Health Belief Model): What did you like about this program? Why? Were the information and materials shared with you to your satisfaction? Why or why not? Would you recommend this program to your friends? And why? What did you expect when joining this program? Has participation in the program met your expectations? Why or why not? What changes do you consider appropriate to make this program, delivered through a website, more widely used and beneficial for older adults like you and those of even greater age?

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jessica Camacho Ruíz, M.Sc

CONTACT

[email protected]

+55 2227089824

Rosalinda Senior Researcher A, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+52 5556276900 ext. 21074

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Preliminary Assessment of the Effects, Usability, Satisfaction, Barriers, and Benefits of a Remote, Multidomain Intervention Supported by a Website to Prevent Cognitive Decline in Older Adults

Acronym: MeMoHealthCogR

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.