yoga
OtherThe yoga program was applied to all patients in this group, accompanied by a physiotherapist. Sessions included selected breathing, warm-up, and relaxation exercises.
NCT Number: NCT06568354
Identification of the effects of yoga and motor control exercises on pain intensity, pain sensitivity, function, and pain cognition in individuals with neck pain.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Patients participating in the study were divided into two parallel groups. The patients in the motor control exercise group were instructed to perform motor control exercises, which consist of strengthening of the deep cervical flexors, deep cervical extensors, and axioscapular muscles; stretching exercises; postural correction exercises, and patients in the yoga group were instructed to perform a yoga program, which consists of breathing, relaxation, and flexibility exercises.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The yoga program was applied to all patients in this group, accompanied by a physiotherapist. Sessions included selected breathing, warm-up, and relaxation exercises.
Motor control exercises with three different progressive phases were applied to all patients in this group accompanied by a physiotherapist.
Time frame: Change from baseline in functional status at 8 weeks
The Neck Disability Index, modified from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire and adapted to the cervical region by Vernon et al. in 1991, will be used to assess disability due to neck pain. In the neck disability index, a score of 0-4 is defined as no disability, a score of 5-14 is defined as mild disability, a score of 15-24 is defined as moderate disability, a score of 25-43 is defined as severe disability and a score above 35 is defined as total disability.
Time frame: Change from baseline in pain intensity at 8 weeks
It will be evaluated with the Numeric Pain Scale. Individuals will be told that '0' means the absence of pain and '10' means the presence of unbearable pain, they will be asked to indicate the average and maximum pain intensity they have experienced in the last 48 hours and the average pain intensity in the last week between 0-10 and their responses will be recorded.
Time frame: Change from baseline in pain sensitivity at 8 weeks
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) assessment will be performed with a device called algometer to evaluate the individuals' pain sensitivity. Initially, 2 trials are performed on the extensor muscles of the forearm to familiarize the participant with the procedure. Afterwards, the person is positioned according to the area to be measured and the measurement points are marked with a pencil. The algometer is placed perpendicular to the skin and a constant pressure is applied. The participant is asked to say "stop" when the feeling of pressure or discomfort turns into a clear sensation of pain. Three measurements are taken at 30 s intervals at each site. The values are averaged and recorded. In this study, right/left C1-C2 and C5-6 articular region, upper part of the Trapezius muscle, Deltoid muscle insertion, lateral epicondyle will be used as measurement points. Measurements will also be made on the Tibialis anterior muscle to assess overall pain sensitivity.
Time frame: Change from baseline in alexithymia at 8 weeks
The alexithymia will be assessed by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS). The scale is a Likert-type self-assessment scale consisting of 20 items and scored between 1-5. Difficulties in recognizing emotions (TAS-1), difficulty in speaking emotions (TAS-2), extroverted thinking (TAS-3) subscales. The individual is asked to select the best option for each item from "Never", "Rarely", "Sometimes", "Often" and "Always". The higher the score, the higher the level of alexithymia.
Time frame: Change from baseline in cognitive function at 8 weeks
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Questionnaire (MoCA) will be used to assess the cognitive function of individuals. MoCA was developed as a rapid screening test for mild cognitive impairment. MoCA assesses various cognitive functions such as attention and concentration, creative functions, memory, language, visual structuring skills, abstract thinking, computation, and orientation. The application of MoCA takes about 10 minutes. The maximum total score of the test is 30. A score of 21 or above is considered normal.
Time frame: Change from baseline in pain catastrophizing at 8 weeks]
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale will be used to evaluate the individual's pain-related catastrophizing thoughts. In the scale consisting of thirteen questions, each question is scored between 0-4. It is graded as "0" never, "1" mildly, "2" moderately, "3 severely, "4" always. The answers to the thirteen questions are summed to obtain a score.
Time frame: Change from baseline in kinesiophobia at 8 weeks
The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS) will be used to assess the kinesiophobia levels of individuals. The TKS is a 17-question Likert scale that examines activity-related injury/reinjury and fear-avoidance parameters. The score on the scale ranges from 17-68, and the higher the score, the higher the level of kinesiophobia.
Time frame: Change from baseline in neck awareness at 8 weeks]
The Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire will be used to assess how individuals perceive the neck area relative to their body. In the questionnaire, there are 9 questions measuring how individuals perceive their neck relative to their body and how they perceive their body position, and the questions are answered in Likert type as "0" I never feel like this, "4" always or often feel like this.
Time frame: Change from baseline in body awareness at 8 weeks
The Body Awareness Rating Questionnaire will be used to assess the body awareness of individuals. This self-reported questionnaire consists of 4 different factors indicating different aspects of body awareness. The factors assess body awareness in terms of function, feeling/emotion, mood and awareness. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert-type scale. Scores for each factor range from 6 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater body awareness
Time frame: Change from baseline in central sensitization at 8 weeks
The Central Sensitization Scale will be used to assess central sensitization. The Central Sensitization Scale is a valid and reliable scale that identifies whether patients' existing symptoms are associated with central sensitization. It consists of two parts. Part A consists of 25 items, including somatic and emotional symptoms related to central sensitization, while part B inquires about previous diagnoses of central sensitization syndromes or related diseases. The frequency of symptoms is assessed on a four-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a high degree of central sensitization.
Time frame: Change from baseline in hand grip strength at 8 weeks
A Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer will be used to measure hand grip strength. The assessment will be performed using the standard measurement method of the American Association of Hand Therapists. For the assessment, the participant is held in an upright sitting position, feet in contact with the floor, arm next to the body, elbow in 90◦ flexion, forearm and wrist in a neutral position. To assess hand grip strength, the evaluated participant's hand is placed so that it grasps the second measurement range of the dynamometer. Grip strength will be assessed by changing hands between measurements and three measurements will be taken for each hand. An interval of 15 seconds will be used between each measurement. The average of the three measurements will be recorded.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Hacettepe University
Other
The Effects of Yoga and Motor Control Exercises on Pain Perception, Function, and Pain Cognition in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07332845
Behavior, Chronic Neck Pain
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07432425
Behavior, Chronic Neck Pain
Ankara, Altindag, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06320340
Behavior, Chronic Neck Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07576556
Chronic Neck Pain, Neck Pain
View Trial Details