Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05604313

The Effects of Using an Ergonomic Chinrest When Playing the Violin

A one-day crossover randomised trial was conducted to compare violinists using an ergonomic chinrest (EC) with do-as-usual on muscle activation, kinematics and sound. After two weeks of testing the EC, self-perceived evaluations on comfort, performance, sound, neck alignment and muscle tension were reported in a questionnaire between EC and do-as-usual.

The main question is to answer if:

1. the EC is superior compared to do-as-usual and gives a more aligned neck posture and less muscle tension/dynamic muscle activity 2. the EC is subjectively evaluated as better than do-as-usual regarding self-perceived comfort, performance and sound

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Ergonomics

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Southern Denmark

Odense, 5230, Denmark

About this study

The purpose of this study is to investigate the measurement of neck kinematics, muscle activation and sound when using EC and a usual chinrest and, additionally, their self-reported experience of neck alignment, muscle tension, sound experience, performance, and comfort.

It is a crossover, block randomised (block sizes of 4) and within-subjects experimental design performed in one day. The design was made to compare an ergonomic chinrest used with a low shoulder rest (EC) with preferred chin and shoulder rest (do-as-usual) in a randomised order and the effect on muscle activation, kinematics and sound. The study also includes a two-week familiarisation period testing the EC before the test day (crossover design). After these two weeks, a questionnaire was given to register self-reported performance, comfort and sound experience.

Furthermore, the participants were asked in an SMS about what ergonomic equipment they used after half a year (the EC, do-as-usual or other equipment).

On the test day, all participants played with both setup an excerpt of a music piece (second movement from W. A. Mozart's violin concerto no. 5 in A major),

The required sample size was estimated based on a previous feasibility study of either being in an awkward or neutral position with the head. We aimed to recruit 38 professional violinists. A professional violinist was defined as having finished the music conservatory with the violin as the main subject or attending school enrolled in the last years (master/soloist player).

The protocol was initial feasibility tested, and we report this study using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 extension to randomised crossover trials.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • speak and write fluently Danish or English
  • Professional violinists
  • No severe pain symptoms in the neck or upper extremities (<3) scored on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst perceived pain).

Exclusion criteria

  • medical conditions that could influence the test result (pacemaker or life-threatening health disorders)
  • trauma on the upper cervical spine or upper extremities within the last 12 months
  • previous or planned shoulder/neck operation
  • severe eczema on the neck and upper extremities.

Treatment and study plan

Ergonomic chinrest used with low shoulder rest (EC)

Device

Participants will play the violin using the ergonomic chinrest with a low Kun Super shoulder rest (EC) for two weeks before the test day (crossover study), measuring upper body kinematic and muscle activity. The novel ergonomic chinrest (Kréddle®, Wyoming, US) is fully adjustable to accommodate each violinist's body type and performance style: regarding height, rotation and tilting. The low Super Kun shoulder rest has been adjusted to be in the lowest position for all legs attached to the violin before the violinists received it. All participants was told not to adjust the shoulder rest but adjust the chinrest.

Primary outcomes

  1. Upper body kinematic was recorded by the device called Vicon

    Time frame: One day

    Neck movement data were collected with Vicon measured in degrees of movement in three anatomical planes: 1) head flexion, 2) head lateral bend, 3) head rotation, 4) trunk flexion, 5) trunk rotation and 6) arm abduction. This measurement was recorded on the test day for both setups while playing a music piece. Furthermore, a test was made on the ROM (head) in a sitting position for all participants before measuring the kinematics during the music piece.

  2. Electromyography was recored with Myon

    Time frame: One day

    Wireless sEMG (Myon 320, AG, Switzerland) was used and placed to measure muscle activity bilaterally from the upper trapezius muscles (UT), upper neck extensor muscles (NE), sternocleidomastoideus muscles (SCM) and on the right medial and left anterior deltoideus muscle (DT). This measurement was recorded on the test day for both setups.

  3. Sound was recorded with Olympus LS-10 stereo digital recorder

    Time frame: One day

    Sound measurement was recorded on the test day for both setups

  4. Self-reported performance score

    Time frame: Two weeks

    Three questions were used for an overall performance score: Have you had difficulty with (within the last 14 days) 1) playing your violin? 2) using your normal technique when playing? 3) playing as well as you would like to? The questions were answered on a 5-point Likert scale from no to impossible. These questions were given after the two-week familiarisation period.

  5. Self-reported comfort score

    Time frame: Two weeks

    Five questions are used for the overall comfort score: How comfortable was (the last 14 days) 1) playing with EC-/ EC+, 2) the height of EC (with your chosen adjustment), 3) the configuration of EC that you have chosen, and 4) the size of the EC chinplate? , 5) the chinrest surface against your skin? The question was answered on a 5-point Likert scale from very comfortable to very uncomfortable. These questions were given after the two-week familiarisation period.

  6. sound quiz

    Time frame: one month

    A quiz with six audio files in a randomised order was sent a month after the test day.

    The quiz was simple: "Do you play using Kréddle (the EC)": yes, no, don't know.

  7. Diary

    Time frame: Two weeks

    Each day during the two-week familiarisation period the violinists had to fill in a diary: written user feedback that will be categorised into positive, negative or neutral feedback. Furthermore about the EC adjustment and their confidence level.

    The adjustment was recorded if they found an adjustment that worked ('Yes', 'No', 'Not yet').

    The confidence level when playing with EC was reported on a 5-point Likert scale (5= very confident, 1=not very confident). 'Very confident' was defined as if the violinist could play the music sheets sent to them also after a break of several days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adherence

    Time frame: Two weeks

    Adherence to the protocol was recorded from the self-administrated two-week diary.

    Adherence was counted as the number of days playing with the EC out of the two weeks.

  2. Compliance

    Time frame: Two weeks

    Compliance to the protocol was recorded from the self-administrated two-week diary. Compliance for playing with EC was hours played out of total playing time.

  3. Follow-up on which product they are using

    Time frame: 6 month

    After the crossover test day the study ends, but the participants have to answer after a half a year if the are still using EC, do-as-usual or another new setup and if it because they participated in this project. This was answered by a SMS message.

  4. Antroprometrics

    Time frame: One day

    Body measurements were taken on the test day: neck length, arm length, height and shoulder width

  5. Instrument measurement

    Time frame: One day

    On the test day the measurement of the length of the instrument, the shoulder rest height and chin rest height was taken for both setups (EC and do-as-usual)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Denmark

Other

Collaborators

  • Axel Muusfeldts fond
  • Region of Southern Denmark
  • Sygekassernes Helsefond

Registry information

Official study title

Self-reported and Objectively Measured Muscle Tension and Neck Kinematics in Violinists Playing With an Ergonomic and Usual Chinrest: a Randomised Crossover Study

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Nov 3, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 14, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.