Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07618143

The Effects of Somatic-Based Chair Exercises in the Elderly

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effects of easily applicable somatic-based chair exercises on balance and pain in the elderly. Additionally, the study aims to reveal the impact of exercise on functionality and cognitive level, and the resulting changes in quality of life.

The main research questions addressed in this study are:

* What are the most suitable exercise models that can be applied to improve pain control and balance in the elderly? * How do the results of different approaches aimed at improving the quality of life in the elderly differ?

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Somatic education refers to a process of sensory-motor learning that enables individuals to develop greater conscious control over their physiological functions. In this study, Thomas Hanna's definition of somatics and Hanna Somatic Education will be used. Thomas Hanna (1976) introduced the term "somatics" to describe the discipline of movement reeducation (somatic education/somatic movement), which aims to promote inner awareness of an individual's body. The practice of somatic movement involves pandiculation. Pandiculation is a process that starts with deliberate muscle activation and transitions into a slow and controlled eccentric release. This is done with ongoing sensory focus, and the movements remain gentle, unforced, and require little effort.

The study design involves comparing the effects of structured somatic-based chair exercises with the effects of a conventional exercise method consisting of basic range of motion exercises combined with static stretching.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 65 years of age or older
  • To be volunteered to participate
  • To be able to speak and understand Turkish at a good level

Exclusion criteria

  • Scoring <24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination
  • Any neurological or orthopedic problem that would prevent the implementation of assessment and exercise methods

Treatment and study plan

Somatic-Based Chair Exercises

Other

The intervention includes a structured somatic-based chair exercise program (SSCE) developed in accordance with Thomas Hanna's somatic education approach. The program consists of gentle, slow, and controlled movements incorporating pandiculation techniques to improve body awareness and movement control. Exercises target multiple body regions, including the neck, trunk, pelvis, shoulders, upper and lower extremities, wrists, hips, and ankles. Sessions will be performed twice weekly for 8 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 35-40 minutes. A total of 35 volunteers will be enrolled in the SSCE.

Other names: Structured Somatic-Based Chair Exercises, SSCE

Conventional exercise group

Other

A total of 35 volunteers will be enrolled in the conventional exercise program, which combines range of motion (ROM) exercises and passive stretching of the same body regions and muscle groups as those addressed in the somatic exercise group.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    Pain will be assessed via the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). BPI measures two objectives: the subjective severity of pain and the causal effect of pain. The questions include numerical rating scales from 0 to 10 (0: none; 1-4: mild; 5-6: moderate, and 7-10: severe).

  2. Balance Ability Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    Balance ability will be assessed by using the Berg Balance Test (BBT).

    The BBT measures balance ability (static and dynamic) among older adults. It is a qualitative measure that assesses balance by performing functional activities such as reaching, bending, transferring, and standing, including most components of postural control. The test contains 14 items. A higher score indicates better balance and a lower risk of falling.

  3. Objective Balance Assessment via Becure Balance System

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    Objective balance performance will be assessed using the Becure Balance System. The system utilizes the Nintendo WiiFit balance board integrated with computer-based software to evaluate static standing balance, center of gravity distribution, and postural oscillations. The validity and reliability of the system have previously been established.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) will be used to assess changes in cognitive levels after the exercise program. The scale is scored between 0 and 30, and includes 6 cognitive functions (memory, visual-spatial skills, executive functions, attention, concentration and working memory tasks, language, and orientation). Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance.

  2. Quality of Life Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    The Quality of Life Scale in the Elderly (CASP-19) will be used to determine changes in the volunteers' quality of life after the exercise program. CASP-19 consists of 19 items and 4 sub-dimensions as 'Control', 'Autonomy', 'Enjoyment', and 'Self-actualization'. Each item of the scale is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3). Higher scores indicate better perceived quality of life and well-being in older adults.

  3. Assessment of Mobility

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) will be used to assess mobility along with fall risk. TUG correlates well with balance, gait speed, and functional capacity.

    In this test, participants are instructed to stand up from a standard chair, walk 3 meters at a comfortable, safe pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again.

    The total time required to complete the task is recorded in seconds. Shorter completion times indicate better functional mobility and dynamic balance, whereas longer times indicate poorer mobility and increased fall risk.

  4. Upper Extremity Muscle Strength Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    The Weight Lifting Test (Arm Curl Test) will be used to assess upper extremity muscle strength. Participants perform as many arm curls as possible within 30 seconds while holding a standardized weight [5 lbs (2.3 kg) for women and 8 lbs (3.6 kg) for men].

    Higher repetition counts indicate better upper extremity muscle strength.

  5. Upper Extremity Flexibility Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    Upper extremity flexibility will be assessed using the Back Scratch Test (Apley Scratch Test). The test measures the distance between or the overlap of the middle fingers behind the back. An overlap between the fingers is recorded as a positive value, whereas a gap between the fingers is recorded as a negative value. Higher positive values indicate better upper extremity flexibility.

  6. Lower Extremity Muscle Strength Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    Lower extremity muscle strength will be assessed using the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test. Participants perform as many sit-to-stand repetitions as possible within 30 seconds. Higher repetition counts indicate better lower extremity muscle strength.

  7. Lower Extremity Flexibility Assessment

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0); at week 4 (T1) and at week 8 (T2)

    Lower extremity flexibility will be assessed using the Chair Sit-and-Reach Test. The test measures the distance between the fingertips and toes while reaching toward the foot from a seated position. The distance between the fingertips and the toes is measured in centimeters. Reaching beyond the toes is recorded as a positive value, whereas the inability to reach the toes is recorded as a negative value. Higher positive values indicate better lower extremity flexibility.

Other outcomes

  1. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    Time frame: 1 week before the study (T0)

    The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to identify the volunteers to be included in the study, as volunteers scoring 24-point or higher on the MMSE will be included in the study.

    The MMSE is a 30-point questionnaire commonly used to evaluate cognitive function, including orientation, attention, memory, language, and visuospatial skills. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

İlkay Tuğçe Köse, M.Sc.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 444 5 438

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Gedik University

Other

Collaborators

  • Medipol University

Registry information

Official study title

The Effects of Somatic-Based Chair Exercises on Balance, Pain, and Quality of Life in the Elderly

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.