Carnegie School of Sport
Leeds, North Humberside, LS2 3AE, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Harriet Cannell
CONTACT
Theocharis Ispoglou
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07135232
The aim of this clinical trial is to determine if resistance training and a newly developed plant-based nutritional supplement can improve the symptoms and musculoskeletal health of perimenopausal women.
The main questions it aims to evaluate are:
1. Can resistance training and the nutritional supplement - both independently and in combination - improve perimenopausal symptoms (e.g. cognition, mood, sleep) and musculoskeletal outcomes (e.g. strength, muscle mass)? 2. What are the acute effects of the nutritional supplement on cognitive function and mood in perimenopausal women, and is this response altered following long-term intake (12 weeks)? 3. What mechanisms may be contributing to the results?
Participants will be split into four groups to allow the researchers to answer the above questions. These are:
1. The nutritional supplement + resistance training 2. The nutritional supplement only 3. The placebo supplement (A look alike capsule that contains no active ingredients) and resistance training 4. The Placebo supplement only.
Participants will:
* Take their allocated supplement daily and perform home-based strength exercise 3 times per week (for exercise groups), for 12 weeks. * Attend the laboratory at the beginning and end of the 12 weeks to assess cognitive function and mood following acute intake of the supplement. * Attend the laboratory every 4 weeks during the 12 week period, for assessment of cognitive function, symptom severity and muscle health. * Provide a blood sample at each visit for assessment of mechanistic pathways.
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year–55 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Leeds, North Humberside, LS2 3AE, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
Harriet Cannell
CONTACT
Theocharis Ispoglou
CONTACT
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Two capsules to give an overall dose of 20 mg of Sarmentosin and 400mg of L-theanine
Home-based Resistance training. Exercises will target the lower and upper body and utilise body weight, resistance bands, dumbbells and push-up handles.
Other names: Strength Training, Resistance Exercise, Strength Exercise
Capsules matched for taste and appearance, without any active ingredients.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed using the depressive sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed using the depressive sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed using the depressive sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake at week 1 of the intervention.
Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake at week 12 of the intervention.
Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed as the number of errors made on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal paired associates task.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed as the number of errors made on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal paired associates task
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed as the number of errors made on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal paired associates task.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery digit span task.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery digit span task
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery digit span task.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed as the total number of assessed trials where the subject chose the correct answer on their first attempt in the One touch stockings of Cambridge task.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed as the total number of assessed trials where the subject chose the correct answer on their first attempt in the One touch stockings of Cambridge task.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed as the total number of assessed trials where the subject chose the correct answer on their first attempt in the One touch stockings of Cambridge task.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised. Retrieval subscale (seven items, range 0-28) and the attentional subscale (four items, score range 0-16). A higher score indicates greater presence of subjective memory or attention difficulties.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised. Retrieval subscale (seven items, range 0-28) and the attentional subscale (four items, score range 0-16). A higher score indicates greater presence of subjective memory or attention difficulties.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised. Retrieval subscale (seven items, range 0-28) and the attentional subscale (four items, score range 0-16). A higher score indicates greater presence of subjective memory or attention difficulties.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, to give a global score between 0 and 21.Higher scores signify poorer subjective sleep quality.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, to give a global score between 0 and 21. Higher scores signify poorer subjective sleep quality.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, to give a global score between 0 and 21. Higher scores signify poorer subjective sleep quality.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed using the Hot flush rating scale. Split into two sub-sections: frequency and problem rating. Scored on a scale from 1 -10, the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean from the three items. A higher score indicates greater problem rating.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed using the Hot flush rating scale. Split into two sub-sections: frequency and problem rating. Scored on a scale from 1 -10, the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean from the three items. A higher score indicates greater problem rating.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed using the Hot flush rating scale. Split into two sub-sections: frequency and problem rating. Scored on a scale from 1 -10, the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean from the three items. A higher score indicates greater problem rating.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed using the anxiety sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed using the anxiety sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed using the anxiety sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed using the stress sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe stress symptoms.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed using the stress sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe stress symptoms.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed using the stress sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe stress symptoms.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed using the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire. The score for each domain ranges from 1 to 8, and the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean score. Higher score represents worse quality of life.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed using the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire. The score for each domain ranges from 1 to 8, and the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean score. Higher score represents worse quality of life.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed using the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire. The score for each domain ranges from 1 to 8, and the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean score. Higher score represents worse quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Assessed using a handgrip dynamometer.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Assessed using the 4-6RM leg extensor strength test.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Assessed using a portable back and leg dynamometer in a standing horizontal pull configuration
Time frame: baseline and Week 12
Assessed as the number of reps completed in 30 seconds
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Measured using dual X-ray Absorptiometry
Time frame: Week 4
To assess the perceived impact of the supplement on mood and cognitive function. Higher scores indicate greater perceived impact
Time frame: Week 8
To assess the perceived impact of the supplement on mood and cognitive function. Higher scores indicate greater perceived impact
Time frame: Week 12
To assess the perceived impact of the supplement on mood and cognitive function. Higher scores indicate greater perceived impact
Time frame: Week 1
Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.
Time frame: Week 4
Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.
Time frame: Week 8
Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.
Time frame: Week 12
Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1
Measured as the number of errors during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal Paired associates task.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12
Measured as the number of errors during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal Paired associates task.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1
Measured as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery backwards digit span task.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12
Measured as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery backwards digit span task.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1.
Measured as the number of problems completed using the minimum number of moves during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery stockings of Cambridge task.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12
Measured as the number of problems completed using the minimum number of moves during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery stockings of Cambridge task.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1.
Assessed using the Bond-Lader visual analogue scale. Scores can be split into alertness, contentment and calmness with lower scores indicating a higher experience of the positive mood state.
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12
Assessed using the Bond-Lader visual analogue scale. Scores can be split into alertness, contentment and calmness with lower scores indicating a higher experience of the positive mood state.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Measured using dual X-ray Absorptiometry
Time frame: Week 4
Analysed using LCMS from a serum sample.
Time frame: Week 8
Analysed using LCMS from a serum sample.
Time frame: Week 12
Analysed using LCMS from a serum sample.
Time frame: Week 4
Analysed using ELISA from obtained serum sample
Time frame: Week 8
Analysed using ELISA from obtained serum sample
Time frame: Week 12
Analysed using ELISA from obtained serum sample
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
Analysed using Amplex assay kit.
Time frame: Baseline to week 8
Analysed using Amplex assay kit.
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
Analysed using Amplex assay kit.
Time frame: Baseline to week 4
Analysed using LCMS
Time frame: Baseline to week 8
Analysed using LCMS
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
Analysed using LCMS
Time frame: Week 4
Analysed using ELISA
Time frame: Week 8
Analysed using ELISA
Time frame: Week 12
Analysed using ELISA
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1
Analysed using LCMS
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12
Analysed using LCMS
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1
Analysed using LCMS
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12
Analysed using LCMS
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1
Analysed using amplex assay kits
Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12
Analysed using amplex assay kits
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Harriet Cannell
CONTACT
Theocharis Ispogolou
CONTACT
Leeds Beckett University
Other
The Effects of Resistance Training and a Sarmentosin - L-theanine Supplement on Perimenopausal Symptoms and Musculoskeletal Health: A Randomised Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07393672
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Pullman, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06865066
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06831916
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Pullman, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07511660
Adnexal Diseases, Cell Therapy
Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
View Trial Details