IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, 40136, Italy
NCT Number: NCT05870826
Non-specific cronic low back pain is very common condition affecting 80-85% of adults. The most common therapies for low back pain are: patient education, excercise and physical therapy. High intensity laser therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment to improve sympthoms in patient with non-specific low back pain when combined wth exercise.
The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a multi-wave locked system laser therapy in patient with non-specif low back pain when administered alone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bologna, 40136, Italy
Chronic nonspecific low back pain, given its high prevalence globally and the disability resulting from it, results in significant deterioration in quality of life and substantial both social and economic costs. The determinants are predominantly biological, in particular musculoskeletal alterations of the lumbar region, but psychosocial factors also contribute significantly to the manifestation of the disorder.
Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain are characterized by pain intensity sometimes disabling, a reduction in lumbar range of motion (ROM) and the frequent absence of flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP). Both high-power and low-power laser therapy, especially when included in a multidimensional rehabilitation plan, seems effective in improving both pain and function of affected patients. MLS (Multiwave Locked System) laser therapy is an innovative high-power technology characterized by the combined and synchronized emission of laser light at two wavelengths (a continuous emission with a wavelength wavelength of 808 nm and a pulsed emission at 905 nm) and its efficacy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain is still unknown.
This work aims to study the effects of MSL laser therapy on pain, disability disability, lumbar ROM and muscle activity in a homogeneous group of patients with from chronic nonspecific low back pain. Although the literature shows that the combination of exercise with laser therapy yields better results in terms of both pain reduction and functional recovery, in this study we chose not to use any combination of treatments, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of MLS laser therapy alone in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain.
To isolate the specific results of MLS laser therapy, it is intended to compare it with a placebo, represented by a device apparently identical in morphology and behavior to that delivering the laser and emitting visible light of similar appearance, by means of a clinical trial double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. The double-blind design is adhered to because the type of laser therapy employed with the protocol followed, despite the effects tissue biology highlighted in the literature, is not able to make the patient feel any heat sensation during the session. 31 This is the first study in the literature aimed at analyzing the possible effects determined by the use of MLS laser therapy in chronic nonspecific low back pain: this investigation is conducted with an integrated methodology, using standardized and validated measures for pain intensity and disability, combined with kinematic and electromyography of high technological value.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
High intensity laser therapy
Sham laser therapy
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Roland-Morris questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Oswestry disability questionnaire
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer
Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)
Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer
Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer
Time frame: At baseline (T0)
Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles
Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)
Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles
Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)
Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Other
Pilot Study on the Effects of MLS (Multiwave Locked System) LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial Versus Placebo
Acronym: MLSLASERlumb
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07429279
Back Pain, Low Back Pain
Minya, Menia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04283409
Non-specific Low Back Pain
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06469762
Non-specific Low Back Pain
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07030816
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Naha, Okinawa, Japan
View Trial Details