Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05870826

The Effects of MLS LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Non-specific cronic low back pain is very common condition affecting 80-85% of adults. The most common therapies for low back pain are: patient education, excercise and physical therapy. High intensity laser therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment to improve sympthoms in patient with non-specific low back pain when combined wth exercise.

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a multi-wave locked system laser therapy in patient with non-specif low back pain when administered alone.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Bologna, 40136, Italy

About this study

Chronic nonspecific low back pain, given its high prevalence globally and the disability resulting from it, results in significant deterioration in quality of life and substantial both social and economic costs. The determinants are predominantly biological, in particular musculoskeletal alterations of the lumbar region, but psychosocial factors also contribute significantly to the manifestation of the disorder.

Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain are characterized by pain intensity sometimes disabling, a reduction in lumbar range of motion (ROM) and the frequent absence of flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP). Both high-power and low-power laser therapy, especially when included in a multidimensional rehabilitation plan, seems effective in improving both pain and function of affected patients. MLS (Multiwave Locked System) laser therapy is an innovative high-power technology characterized by the combined and synchronized emission of laser light at two wavelengths (a continuous emission with a wavelength wavelength of 808 nm and a pulsed emission at 905 nm) and its efficacy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain is still unknown.

This work aims to study the effects of MSL laser therapy on pain, disability disability, lumbar ROM and muscle activity in a homogeneous group of patients with from chronic nonspecific low back pain. Although the literature shows that the combination of exercise with laser therapy yields better results in terms of both pain reduction and functional recovery, in this study we chose not to use any combination of treatments, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of MLS laser therapy alone in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain.

To isolate the specific results of MLS laser therapy, it is intended to compare it with a placebo, represented by a device apparently identical in morphology and behavior to that delivering the laser and emitting visible light of similar appearance, by means of a clinical trial double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. The double-blind design is adhered to because the type of laser therapy employed with the protocol followed, despite the effects tissue biology highlighted in the literature, is not able to make the patient feel any heat sensation during the session. 31 This is the first study in the literature aimed at analyzing the possible effects determined by the use of MLS laser therapy in chronic nonspecific low back pain: this investigation is conducted with an integrated methodology, using standardized and validated measures for pain intensity and disability, combined with kinematic and electromyography of high technological value.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic low back pain (> 3 months)
  • Lack of effectivness of previous conservative therapies for low back pain
  • Body mass index < 30
  • Preserved cognitive ability to fully understand and observe indications received by medical personnel
  • Ability to understand and give an informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Spine surgery
  • Spinal hernia
  • spondylolisthesis
  • Spinal infections
  • Severe spine deformities
  • Neural diseases
  • Rheumatic diseases
  • Diabetes
  • Psychiatric diseases
  • Vascular diseases
  • Cancer
  • Infectious diseases
  • Kidney stones
  • Skin abrasion
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Recent injuries
  • Known sensibility to Laser therapy
  • Epilepsy
  • Anticoagulant therapy
  • Pacemaker
  • hemorrhagic diathesis
  • Photosensitizing drugs
  • Kown Photosensibility
  • Low back Tattoos
  • Steroid injections in the previous 3 weeks
  • Antinflammatory or pain drugs
  • HIV positive
  • Neuro-stimulation implanted systems
  • Tissue with ischemia in the low back

Treatment and study plan

Multiwave locked system laser therapy

Other

High intensity laser therapy

Sham laser therapy

Other

Sham laser therapy

Primary outcomes

  1. Low back pain

    Time frame: At baseline (T0)

    VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)

  2. Low back pain

    Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)

    VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)

  3. Low back pain

    Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)

    VAS, Visual Analogic Scale minimum 0 (the best) and maximum 10 (the worst)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disability

    Time frame: At baseline (T0)

    Roland-Morris questionnaire

  2. Disability

    Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)

    Roland-Morris questionnaire

  3. Disability

    Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)

    Roland-Morris questionnaire

  4. Pain and Disability

    Time frame: At baseline (T0)

    Oswestry disability questionnaire

  5. Pain and Disability

    Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)

    Oswestry disability questionnaire

  6. Pain and Disability

    Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)

    Oswestry disability questionnaire

Other outcomes

  1. Trunk kinematics

    Time frame: At baseline (T0)

    Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer

  2. Trunk kinematics

    Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)

    Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer

  3. Trunk kinematics

    Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)

    Degree of trunk flexion and velocity of the flexion measured with an accelerometer

  4. Low back muscles activation

    Time frame: At baseline (T0)

    Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles

  5. Low back muscles activation

    Time frame: 3 weeks (T1)

    Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles

  6. Low back muscles activation

    Time frame: One month by the end of the intervention (T2)

    Flexion-relaxation phenomenon assessed by means of surface EMG electrodes placed over the longissimus dorsi and the multifidus muscles

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pilot Study on the Effects of MLS (Multiwave Locked System) LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial Versus Placebo

Acronym: MLSLASERlumb

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
May 23, 2023
Registry last updated
May 25, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.