Facultad de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Valladolid
Soria, 42004, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04060004
The term myofascial pain refers to the existence of myofascial trigger points (MTP), which are defined as hypersensitive points in a tense band of skeletal muscle, which can cause referred pain or autonomous phenomena.
To address the treatment of myofascial trigger points, conservative and invasive techniques have been proposed. Dry needling is one of the invasive techniques that have been shown to be effective in improving pain and function in patients with myofascial trigger points.
This trial aims to analyse the effectiveness of dry needling in patients with myofascial neck pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Soria, 42004, Spain
The main objective of the study is to analyze the effects of dry needling on the superficial neck musculature in patients with chronic myofascial neck pain in terms of pain, functional capacity, mobility, psychosocial variables and motor control compared with both sham dry needling group and control group.
In addition, a secondary objective is to analyze the relationships between the psychosocial variables and the results obtained in the variables analyzed in the patients belonging to the three groups.
For this purpose the investigators conduct a randomized controlled trial double-blind. Patients included are randomized into 3 groups. One receives dry needling, another one receives sham dry needling, and the last one is a control group.
The hypothesis of this study is that patients in the real dry needling group will improve more compared to patients in the sham dry needling group and the control group.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dry needling is a technique used by physiotherapists.
Sham dry needling is a technique used by physiotherapists to compare the effects of dry needling.
Standard care of neck pain.
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the neck pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 11 days.
The investigators measure the neck pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the cervical disability with Neck Disability Index (NDI) at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average 11 days.
The investigators measure the cervical disability with Neck Disability Index (NDI) at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the motor control with Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT) at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average 11 days.
The investigators measure the motor control with Craniocervical Flexion Test (CCFT) at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the neck range of motion with an inclinometer at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average 11 days.
The investigators measure the neck range of motion with an inclinometer at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the pressure pain threshold with a digital algometer at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average 11 days.
The investigators measure the pressure pain threshold with a digital algometer at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the kinesiophobia with Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average 11 days.
The investigators measure the kinesiophobia with Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) at the end of the intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the pain catastrophism with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average 11 days.
The investigators measure the pain catastrophism with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at the end of intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
Time frame: Baseline.
The investigators measure the anxiety and depression with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at baseline.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average 11 days.
The investigators measure the anxiety and depression with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at the end of intervention (through study completion, an average 11 days).
University of Valladolid
Other
The Effects of Dry Needling on the Superficial Neck Musculature in Patients With Chronic Myofascial Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07722676
Neck Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06503562
Chronic Pain Syndrome, Neck Pain
Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07292350
Back Pain, Neck Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07133646
Neck Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details