Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07247318

The Effects of Different Non-invasive Respiratory Support

Patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) typically present with pathophysiological alterations characterized by the coexistence of respiratory dysfunction and hypoxemia. Respiratory dysfunction leads to dyspnea, increased work of breathing, use of accessory respiratory muscles, and hypercapnia, while gas exchange impairment results in hypoxemia. Studies have shown that hypercapnia, acidosis, and hypoxemia can all enhance inspiratory effort, which further increases negative intrathoracic pressure. In these patients, regional differences in airway resistance and lung compliance are often present, causing redistribution of air within the lungs. This redistribution manifests as gas movement from non-dependent to dependent regions, known as "pendelluft," which amplifies regional alveolar strain and ventilation heterogeneity. This phenomenon becomes more pronounced during noninvasive respiratory support when spontaneous breathing is preserved.

Noninvasive respiratory support strategies mainly include high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). HFNO delivers high-flow gas through nasal cannulas, generating a certain level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and flushing out anatomical dead space to improve gas exchange, thereby reducing inspiratory effort, lowering the work of breathing, and enhancing oxygenation. NIV, typically using pressure support ventilation (NIV-PSV), is a patient-triggered, pressure-targeted mode that provides inspiratory positive pressure above PEEP. By augmenting tidal volume and reducing inspiratory effort, NIV improves gas exchange; however, leaks may limit the effective delivery of PEEP, and full inspiratory synchronization can increase transpulmonary driving pressure and tidal volume. CPAP, by contrast, delivers a constant positive pressure during both inspiration and expiration. Compared with HFNO, CPAP generates higher PEEP, which facilitates alveolar recruitment and more effectively improves oxygenation. Relative to NIV, CPAP may reduce transpulmonary driving pressure and tidal volume.

Different noninvasive respiratory support strategies exert varying effects on respiratory drive and regional lung strain, leading to differences in the occurrence and magnitude of pendelluft. Physiological studies have suggested that CPAP may offer greater benefits in improving oxygenation and reducing inspiratory effort; however, whether it can mitigate the occurrence and extent of pendelluft remains uncertain. Therefore, this study was conducted to visualize and quantitatively assess pendelluft in real time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), aiming to verify whether CPAP has a superior effect in reducing pendelluft in patients with AHRF.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 300 mmHg or SpO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 315 (with SpO₂ ≤ 97%);
  • Requiring one of the following respiratory supports:
  • Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with PEEP ≥ 5 cmH₂O, or
  • High-flow nasal oxygen therapy with a flow rate ≥ 30 L/min, or
  • Conventional oxygen therapy with an oxygen flow ≥ 10 L/min, where FiO₂ is calculated using the formula: FiO₂ = 0.21 + (oxygen flow rate × 0.03).

Exclusion criteria

  • Received CPAP or NIV for more than 24 hours prior to screening.
  • Received invasive mechanical ventilation during the current hospitalization.
  • Presence of chronic underlying pulmonary disease, or PaCO₂ ≥ 45 mmHg.
  • Presence of cardiogenic pulmonary edema.
  • Hemodynamic instability, defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or norepinephrine-equivalent dose > 0.3 µg/kg/min.
  • Impaired consciousness (GCS ≤ 12).
  • Patients requiring urgent intubation, including those with respiratory or cardiac arrest, apnea with loss of consciousness or gasping, or severe hypoxemia (defined as SpO₂ < 90% despite 100% oxygen).
  • Contraindications to NIV: cardiac or respiratory arrest, coma, untreated pneumothorax, uncontrollable vomiting, upper airway obstruction, hematemesis or severe facial trauma, or thoracic/abdominal surgery within the past 7 days.
  • Contraindications to EIT: implanted cardiac pacemaker, unstable spinal injury or fracture, or open chest trauma.
  • Refusal of endotracheal intubation.
  • Pregnancy.

Treatment and study plan

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Device

Patients were placed at a 45-degree supine position, and noninvasive ventilation was delivered to the patient through a face mask connected to an ICU ventilator. 2.PEEP was started at 5 cm H2O with a FiO2 of 0.5 at initiation. PEEP and FiO2 were titrated to maintain SpO2 between 94 and 98%, remaining constant for at least 5 min. 3.CPAP was initiated with a first session of at least 4 h, the minimally required duration of noninvasive ventilation was 16 hours per day for at least 2 calendar days. Between noninvasive-ventilation sessions, patients received HFNO.

Non-invasive ventilation

Device

Patients were placed at a 45-degree supine position, and noninvasive ventilation was also delivered to the patient through a face mask connected to an ICU ventilator. The mask most appropriate for the patient will be selected and adjusted to minimize leakage and pressure points. 2. The inspiratory positive airway pressure (pressure support plus PEEP) was initiated between 12 and 14 cm H2O, PEEP was started at 5 cm H2O with a FiO2 of 0.5 at initiation. FiO2 was titrated to maintain SpO2 between 94 and 98%, remaining constant for at least 5 min. 3. NIV was initiated with a first session of at least 4 h, the minimally required duration of noninvasive ventilation was 16 hours per day for at least 2 calendar days. Between noninvasive-ventilation sessions, patients received HFNO.

High-flow nasal oxygen

Device

Oxygen was passed through a heated humidifier (MR850, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare) and applied continuously through large-bore binasal prongs, with a gas flow rate of 50 liters per minute and an FiO2 of 0.5 at initiation. HFNO heating temperature was prespecified at 37°C. 2.FiO2 will be titrated to maintain SpO2 between 94 and 98%, remaining constant for at least 5 min. 3.HFNO was applied for at least 2 calendar days.

Primary outcomes

  1. Magnitude of Pendelluft

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    magnitude of Pendelluft using a software based on electrical impedance tomography monitoring

Secondary outcomes

  1. pH

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    Arterial blood gas analysis

  2. Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    Arterial blood gas analysis

  3. Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    Arterial blood gas analysis

  4. Pao2/FiO2

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    Arterial blood gas analysis

  5. Occlusion pressure at 100 ms (P0.1)

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    Monitoring with non-invasive ventilator

  6. Occluded inspiratory airway pressure (Pocc)

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    Monitoring with a non-invasive ventilator

  7. center of ventilation

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    monitoring with EIT

  8. RVD

    Time frame: during the first 48 hours

    Monitoring with EIT

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Southeast University, China

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Physiological Effects of Different Non-invasive Respiratory Support in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 25, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.