Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07745062

The Effectiveness of Systane PRO Preservative Free Verses Blink Triple Care Preservative Free

The goal of this investigational study is to determine if Systane PRO Preservative Free is non-inferior to BLINK TRIPLE CARE in the clinically significant improvement of signs and symptoms of dry eye in patients over 4 weeks.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Gordon Schanzlin New Vision Institute

La Jolla, California, 92037, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

David I Geffen, Doctor Of Optometry

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rylee Owen

CONTACT

[email protected]

858-455-6800

About this study

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, crossover study designed to compare the effectiveness of preservative-free Systane PRO Preservative Free and Blink Triple Care Preservative Free in improving the signs and symptoms of mild-to-moderate Dry Eye Disease. Approximately 80 adults (≥18 years) with an OSDI score of 13-32 and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/32 or better will be enrolled.

Participants will complete a 1-week artificial tear washout period prior to enrollment. Subjects will then be randomized to receive either Systane PRO Preservative Free or Blink Triple Care Preservative Free, instilled four times daily in both eyes for 30 days. Following a 1-week washout period, subjects will cross over to the alternate treatment for an additional 30 days.

Participants will attend five study visits (Baseline, Day 7, Day 30, Day 44, and Day 67) and complete a daily dosing diary to monitor treatment compliance. At each visit, assessments will include the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaires, best-corrected visual acuity, non-invasive tear breakup time (NI-TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and adverse event evaluation. Refraction will be performed at baseline only.

The primary efficacy analyses will evaluate changes in dry eye symptoms (OSDI and SPEED) and objective tear film measures (NI-TBUT and CFS) from baseline through each treatment period, with direct comparison between the two artificial tear formulations. Visual acuity is expected to remain stable throughout the study. An interim analysis will be conducted after the first 30 participants have completed enrollment to determine whether the study should continue to full enrollment based on evidence of a meaningful treatment difference.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: Adults ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnosis: Clinical diagnosis of mild to moderate dry eye disease in at least one eye with OSDI ≥ 13 to ≤ 32 at screening.
  • OSDI ≥ 13 to ≤ 32 at screening.
  • Objective evidence: NITBUT ≤ 10 seconds in the study eye(s) at screening.
  • Ocular surface status: CFS ≤ grade 3 (Oxford or NEI scale) in the study eye(s).
  • Stable medications: Systemic medications that may affect tear film must be stable ≥ 30 days prior to screening and expected to remain stable during the study.
  • Ability to participate: Able and willing to comply with procedures, attend visits, and provide written informed consent.
  • Contraception: Women of childbearing potential must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception for the study duration and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.

Exclusion criteria

  • Active ocular infection or inflammation unrelated to DED (e.g., bacterial/viral conjunctivitis, active uveitis).
  • Severe ocular surface disease beyond typical DED (e.g., severe keratitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid).
  • Excessive corneal staining: CFS > grade 3 in the study eye(s).
  • Recent ocular surgery or procedure: ocular surgery, laser, or punctal occlusion within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Current or prior use within 6 months before screening of either study drop (Systane PRO PF or Blink Triple Care PF)
  • Contact lens wear: soft or rigid contact lens use within 7 days prior to baseline, or unwillingness to discontinue lenses for the study; consider extending to 14 days if desired.
  • Use of topical ophthalmic medications that cannot be discontinued (e.g., topical antibiotics, corticosteroids).
  • Recent investigational product use: participation in another interventional trial or investigational product use within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Known hypersensitivity: allergy to any component of Systane PRO PF or Blink Triple Care PF.
  • Confounding systemic conditions: systemic diseases or medications that, in the investigator's judgment, could significantly affect tear production or ocular surface health (e.g., uncontrolled autoimmune disease, recent initiation/change of systemic medications known to affect tear production within 30 days).
  • Severe visual impairment in the study eye(s) not attributable to DED that would interfere with assessments.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Investigator discretion: any medical, psychiatric, or social condition that would preclude safe participation or reliable completion of study procedures.

Treatment and study plan

Systane PRO

Drug

Administer Systane Pro PF QID OU over a period of 30 days

Blink tears

Drug

Administer Blink Triple Care PF QID OU over a period of 30 days

Primary outcomes

  1. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)

    Time frame: 30 days

    Change in OSDI score from baseline to Day 30 (non-inferiority) Quantify the severity of dry eye symptoms. Assess the impact of symptoms on vision-related activities. Evaluate the effect of environmental factors on ocular comfort. Monitor changes in symptoms over time and in response to treatment.

    Ocular Symptoms Light sensitivity Gritty sensation Pain or soreness Blurred vision Poor vision

    Vision-Related Function Difficulty reading Difficulty driving at night Difficulty working with a computer or ATM Difficulty watching television Environmental Triggers Windy conditions Low humidity Air-conditioned environments

    Patients report how often they experienced each symptom or limitation during the previous week using a 0-4 scale:

    0 = None of the time

    • = Some of the time
    • = Half of the time
    • = Most of the time
    • = All of the time

Secondary outcomes

  1. Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED)

    Time frame: 30 days

    Change in patient reported dry eye symptoms (SPEED) from baseline to Day 30

    Patients report symptoms including:

    Dryness Grittiness or scratchiness Soreness or irritation Burning or watering Eye fatigue

    Frequency Score: 0-4 Severity Score: 0-4 Total SPEED Score: 0-28

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Rylee Owen

CONTACT

[email protected]

858-455-6800

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gordon Schanzlin New Vision

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effectiveness of Systane PRO Preservative Free Verses Blink Triple Care Preservative Free in Providing Relief From Multiple Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease, and Its Impact on Daily Functioning and Overall Comfort in Dry Eye Subjects

Acronym: SYSTANEvBLINK

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Aug 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.