Division of mental health, St Georges medical school, university of london
London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT00461318
The primary aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of a form of supported employment, Individual Placement and Support (IPS) compared to existing good quality rehabilitation and vocational services for people with psychotic illnesses in terms of 'open' employment outcomes (in the competitive labour market), and to examine its relative effectiveness in the context of different European welfare systems and labour markets. The primary hypothesis was that IPS patients would be more likely to obtain open employment than control service patients. Secondary hypotheses were that they would be in open employment for longer than the control patients, and that they would not spend more time in hospital.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom
An RCT was conducted in six European centres: London (UK), Ulm-Guenzburg (Germany), Rimini (Italy), Zurich (Switzerland), Groningen (the Netherlands) and Sofia (Bulgaria). Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of SMI (psychotic illness including bipolar disorder), were aged 18 to retirement age, had been ill and had major role dysfunction for at least two years, were living in the community at baseline, had not been in competitive employment in the preceding year and expressed the desire to enter competitive employment. They were randomly allocated to receive either IPS or the 'Vocational Service' (control service). Given the need to consider the impact of gender and work history on vocational outcomes (20), service allocation was stratified by centre, gender and work history (more or less than a month's competitive employment in the five years prior to baseline). Randomisation was conducted centrally using MINIM Version 1.5. A researcher at each centre recruited the patients, submitted them to the statistician for randomisation and received the allocation by email. The allocation sequence was concealed until the services had been assigned, but it was not possible for patients, professionals or researchers to be blind to service allocation thereafter.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
University of Oxford
Other
Enhancing the Quality of Life and Independence of Persons Disabled by Severe Mental Illness Through Supported Employment
Acronym: EQOLISE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05808244
Mental Disorders, Psychosis
Kowloon, Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT07364825
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04004416
Bipolar Disorder, Bipolar and Related Disorders
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05863572
Mental Disorders, Psychosis
Kampala, Uganda
View Trial Details