University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Central Region, 1452, Denmark
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Celia Faye Jacobsen, PhD
CONTACT
45 + 22261168
Celia Faye Jacobsen, PhD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Stig Poulsen, Professor
CONTACT
45 + 28593543
NCT Number: NCT06916429
The primary aim of "the Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Common mental disorders" (EPIC) randomized controlled trial is to investigate whether a significantly larger symptom improvement is observed after approximately four months of psychotherapeutic treatment in the Danish primary sector compared to in a waiting list control group. The secondary aim of the study is to identify specific client and therapy characteristics that may predict the effectiveness of the therapy or the symptom development in the waiting list control group. The main hypothesis of the EPIC trial is:
1) Four and a half months after randomization, we will find a significantly lower level of symptoms on the primary outcome measure (PHQ-ADS) among clients who receive psychotherapy, compared to clients in the waiting list control group. In addition, we hypothesize to find significantly better outcomes in the psychotherapy group on all secondary outcome measures, four and a half months after randomization.
Researchers will compare:
* Psychotherapy starting within 14 days after the randomization date with * Placement on a waiting list for psychotherapy with treatment starting approximately four and a half months after the randomization date
to investigate whether a larger symptom improvement is observed in the group receiving psychotherapy compared to the waiting list control group.
Participants will:
* Be referred by their general practitioner (GP) for publicly subsidized psychotherapy treatment in the primary care sector in Denmark, based on one of 11 referral reasons. * Complete the baseline questionnaire containing background information, the primary and secondary outcome measures, and predictor questionnaires, and subsequently be randomized to either psychotherapy beginning within two weeks or a waiting list control group. * Receive a brief symptom questionnaire (the PHQ-ADS) every other week after the randomization date via an SMS-based solution provided by REDCap. * Complete the primary and secondary outcome measures approximately four and a half, eight and a half, and 16 and a half months after the randomization date.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Copenhagen, Central Region, 1452, Denmark
Location status: Recruiting
Celia Faye Jacobsen, PhD
CONTACT
45 + 22261168
Celia Faye Jacobsen, PhD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Stig Poulsen, Professor
CONTACT
45 + 28593543
Aims:
The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate whether a significantly higher symptom improvement is observed after approximately four months of psychotherapeutic treatment in the Danish primary sector compared to a waiting list control group. A supplementary aim is to explore whether the treatment effect is maintained during follow-up assessed approximately eight and 16 months after the beginning of treatment. The secondary aim of the study is to investigate whether specific client and therapy characteristics predicting the effect of the therapy and the symptom change in the waitlist control group can be identified, and whether the quality of the therapeutic alliance measured after approximately five weeks of therapy is related to the outcome of therapy.
The hypotheses of the study are as follows:
Primary Analysis:
Secondary Analyses:
Secondary Predictor Analyses:
All analyses are conducted as intention-to-treat with multiple imputations of missing data.
Study Design:
The study is designed as a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a block randomization of clients referred by their general practitioner (GP) for psychotherapy treatment in the primary care sector in Denmark. The clients are randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio to one of the following options:
Participants:
Participants will typically be referred by their GP based on one of 11 referral reasons, which include:
Procedure:
Ethics:
Dissemination of Results:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Clients:
Psychologists:
Exclusion criteria
The psychotherapeutic treatment will reflect the therapy practices that characterize the Danish primary sector.
Treatment: Clients are referred by their GP to receive up to 12 individual psychotherapy sessions, typically of 50-60 minutes' duration. For clients with depression and anxiety as referral reason, it is possible to get a supplementary referral by the GP ensuring 12 more sessions, totaling 24 sessions of therapy.
Procedure: Due to the Danish primary sector having relative freedom in method of choice, the psychologist carries out the psychotherapy according to the treatment principles they consider the most relevant, without clauses regarding specific models of therapy or manualization. The therapists register the therapeutic approaches and interventions used in each course of therapy on The Multitheoretical List of Therapeutic Interventions (MULTI-30)at the end of each treatment.
Other names: psychological treatment, psychotherapy, psychological intervention
Treatment: During the waiting list period, clients will not receive any psychotherapeutic treatment for their mental health issues in the Danish primary sector. However, their general practitioner may refer them to appropriate psychiatric treatment if their mental condition worsens and requires immediate treatment.
Procedure: Clients in the waiting list group will fill in questionnaires on their symptom development during the waiting period. They will complete the same set of predictor and outcome questionnaires as the psychotherapy group.
Other names: waitlist, waiting list control group, waitlist for therapy
Time frame: Measured at: Baseline, bi-weekly, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date
The PHQ-ADS combines the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 in to a composite measure of depression and anxiety. The PHQ-ADS sums the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 in to a total score ranging from 0 to 48. The PHQ-ADS has demonstrated high internal reliability as well as convergent validity and con-struct validity in a large sample of primary care patients.
Time frame: Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date
The SDS is a three-item rating scale that assesses functioning in relation to three domains: work and/or education, social relationships, and family life. The client rates the extent to which a given domain has been impaired by psychological symptoms within the last month, on a scale from 0 ("not at all impaired") to 10 ("very severely impaired").
Time frame: Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date
The WHO-5 is a five-item rating scale on psychological wellbeing. Each item relates to wellbeing within the past two weeks and is rated on a scale from 0 ("none of the time") to 5 ("all of the time"). The total raw score is multiplied by four to compute a percentage scale from 0 (absence of wellbeing) to 100 (maximal wellbeing).
Time frame: Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date, eight and a half months after randomization date, 12 months after randomization date
The PSS is a ten-item questionnaire assessing the client's experience of stress within the last month. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very often"), with a sum score ranging from 0-40.
Time frame: Measured at: Baseline, four and a half months after randomization date.
The CSQ is an eight-item questionnaire assessing the client's satisfaction with the therapy. The items are rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from one to four, with a sum score ranging from 8-32.
Time frame: Measured at: Baseline and four and a half months after randomization date.
The NEQ is a 20-item questionnaire assessing the occurrence and severity of a series of negative events associated with receiving psychotherapy.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Celia Faye Jacobsen, PhD
CONTACT
45+ 22261168
Stig Poulsen, Professor
CONTACT
45 + 28593543
University of Copenhagen
Other
The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Common Mental Disorders (EPIC): A Randomized Waitlist-controlled Superiority Trial.
Acronym: EPIC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02563743
Adjustment Disorders, Anxiety Disorders
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07735910
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Shenyang, Liaoning, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00024635
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07692269
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details