Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06548334

The Effectiveness of Lumber Regression Technique on Disc Bulge Randomized Control Trial

Lumbar disc bulges lead to considerable pain and disability in affected individuals, with current interventions lacking consistency of outcomes. The lumbar regression method offered a hopeful, noninvasive option.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Nemat Hospital & Heart Center, Manga Mandi

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

About this study

this study was proposed to evaluate its efficacy in improving accessary lower limb flexibility and reducing functional disability and pain management. To provide evidence about its effectiveness and help with clinical practice, this study aimed to improve patient outcomes in subjects having lumbar disc bulges.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals with a diagnosis of Disc bulge confirmed by MRI.
  • Between 18 and 65 years of age.
  • Chronic low back pain from the last 3 months
  • A stable treatment environment that allows intervention.
  • Ability to understand and follow course directions.
  • Willingness to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Spondylosis
  • Vertebral fracture
  • Lack of ava
  • Further research interventions.
  • Unstable medical condition

Treatment and study plan

Advanced Physiotherapy

Combination Product

The physiotherapist used the regression techniques for 1 hour of session 2 times for 8 weeks. The caudal component involved the spinous process of the treated segment touching the therapist's hand and not applying force as though mobilising the segment at grade 2. These were applied if there is a suspected case of a posterolateral disc prolapse where the aim is to increase the diameter of the foramen and decrease the tension exerted on the nerve root. Applied posteroanterior was used to distract the anterior intervertebral end plate and to approximate the posterior end plates so as to pull back the protruded nuclear material by creating a negative pressure.

Conventional Physiotherapy Techniques

Other

In traditional physiotherapy, the patient underwent two sessions per week for eight weeks. Each session lasted one hour and included 20minutes of TENS treatment. The flexibility exercises consisted of hamstring stretches and single and double knee-to-chest stretches. The strengthening exercises were partial sit-ups, quadruped lifts, and double leg hold; pelvic tilts were performed with 10-15 repetitions, each held for 20-30 seconds and repeated three times.

Primary outcomes

  1. Roland Morris disability questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 Months

    The Roland-Morris low back pain and disability questionnaire (RMD) was utilised to evaluate the quality of life prior to and following the completion of the treatment. This questionnaire has demonstrated strong validity and reliability. The score is measured on a scale of 0 to 24, and percentage scores were calculated for each participant. Greater scores indicate a greater level of disabilities. Its sensitivity is 95%, and its specificity is 69%.

  2. Straight Leg Raise

    Time frame: 12 months

    The normal angle for an SLR is from 0-35 degrees, which signifies the least amount of strain. Stretched from 35-70 degrees, sciatic nerve root stretching is achieved, and possible problems such as herniated disc or radiculopathy may be evidenced. 70- 90 degrees reflect highest normal flexibility: it may be related to hip joint pathology or some other conditions which are not a result of nerve injury. During both the first evaluation and the final therapy, the SLR was assessed using a digital inclinometer (clinometer) installed on a Techno Camon 20 Android phone. The digital inclinometer has been found to exhibit high levels of reliability and validity

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Superior University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Aug 12, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.