Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03567148

The Effectiveness of Different Methods for Healing a Palatal Donor Site

Postoperative complications associated with free gingival graft (FGG) procedures are prolonged bleeding from the donor site, postoperative pain and delayed wound healing which increases the patients' morbidity. Hence, the aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of different treatment modalities on palatal wound healing and patient's morbidity after FGG. Ninety patients requiring FGG were randomly will be assigned into six groups: group 1: Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) membrane, group 2: Essix retainer, group 3: topical ozone therapy, group 4: low-level laser therapy (LLLT), group 5: collagen fleece and group 6: untreated control group. Epithelization will be evaluated by means of bubble formation; sensitivity, edema, pain, changes in eating habits and burning sensation will be assessed by using visual analog scale (VAS) and also the presence of discomfort and bleeding will be evaluated in the postoperative first week and at 14 days, 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Inadequate attached gingiva is one of the major mucogingival problems for many individuals. However, the width of the keratinized tissue required to prevent periodontal disease remains unclear. Recently, a consensus report highlighted that if an individual's plaque control is suboptimal, a minimum of 2 mm of keratinized tissue and 1 mm of attached gingiva is needed.

Palatal keratinized mucosa is the most favorable donor region for a free gingival graft (FGG) due to its anatomic properties such as being histologically identical to keratinized attached mucosa of alveolar ridge and its ideal tissue thickness. The FGG surgical wound heals within 2-4 weeks, and prolonged bleeding, pain, and delayed wound healing of either the donor or recipient sites, which increases the patient's risk of morbidity, are the most common postoperative complications following surgery. Although homeostatic agents, mechanical barriers, and bioactive materials have been found to be effective in preventing these complications, the most ideal treatment has not yet been determined.

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), a platelet concentrate, is a safe and cost-effectiveness procedure that does not require biochemical blood handling. PRF has been used in many fields as an autologous biomaterial with a great healing potential for regenerating soft tissue and bones without inflammatory reactions, and it may be used to promote hemostasis and wound healing due to the presence of many growth factors. Recent studies have concluded that using PRF membranes after harvesting FGG enhances wound healing, reduces a patient's discomfort, and decreases need to change eating habits; thus, it reduces patient morbidity.

An Essix® retainer (Clear Advantage Series, Ortho Technology, Florida, USA) is a thermoplastic material used for stabilization after orthodontic treatment. It has been reported that gingival wounds that heal by secondary intention should be sheltered during the period of epithelization to protect against topical irritants, trauma, acidic or highly seasoned foods, and toothbrush abrasion.

It has been suggested that hemostatic agents provide faster and continuous hemostasis and make a positive contribution to early soft tissue healing. Application of hemostatic agents to the palatal donor sites has been found to be highly beneficial for achieving hemostasis in comparison to pressure only. Collagen fleece is a hemostatic agent that is made from the natural collagen of porcine dermis. The structure of the collagen promotes the formation and stabilization of blood clots during the initial wound healing phase. Recently, collagen-based materials have been used to improve early wound healing with an open healing design in the palatal area.

Ozone is a natural gaseous molecule made up of three oxygen atoms. The use of ozone has been proposed in dentistry because of its a strong oxidation effect and its antimicrobial potential, biocompatibility, and healing properties. In a previous study, the application of ozonated oil was reported to improve epithelial healing and gingival health following topical application. Taşdemir et al. concluded that ozone therapy could enhance wound healing, and the patients receiving this therapy experienced less pain after FGG operations than patients that had not received it.

Lower-level laser therapy (LLLT) is known as 'soft laser therapy' or 'bio-stimulation'. In dentistry, LLLT is usually used to accelerate wound healing, enhance remodeling and repair of bone, and reduce pain. Application of LLLT has been shown to improve wound healing after FGG and gingivectomy.

In light of this aforementioned information, it has been hypothesized that applications of PRF, an Essix retainer, collagen fleece, ozone therapy, and LLLT can result in improved wound healing after harvesting FGG in comparison to spontaneous healing. Thus, the present study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of these methods on palatal wound healing and patient morbidity.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age >18,
  • systemically healthy,
  • non-smoker,
  • full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores <20%,
  • isolated gingival recession defects on the mandibular and maxillary anterior teeth with insufficient keratinized gingiva,

Exclusion criteria

  • history of mucogingival surgery on the palatal area
  • pregnancy
  • systemic antibiotics taken for at least six months before the study
  • having systemic diseases that could compromise wound healing

Treatment and study plan

PRF

Procedure

Applying to the palatal wounds

Other names: medical device

Essix retainer

Procedure

Applying to the palatal wounds

Other names: medical device

Ozone Therapy

Procedure

Applying to the palatal wounds

Other names: medical device

LLLT

Procedure

Applying to the palatal wounds

Other names: medical device

Collagen fleece

Procedure

Applying to the palatal wounds

Other names: medical device

Primary outcomes

  1. VAS questionnaire regarding to postoperative pain

    Time frame: 30th days postoperatively

    The VAS was divided into 10 segments, and the patients were asked to rank their pain level using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS questionnaire regarding to postoperative sensitivity

    Time frame: 30th days postoperatively

    The VAS was divided into 10 segments, and the patients were asked to rank their sensitivity level using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 10

  2. hydrogen peroxide test

    Time frame: 30th days postoperatively

    Epithelization was evaluated using the same time-points by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) onto the operation site

  3. VAS questionnaire regarding to changes in eating habits

    Time frame: 30th days postoperatively

    The VAS was divided into 10 segments, and the patients were asked to rank their eating habits level using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 10

  4. VAS questionnaire regarding to burning sensation

    Time frame: 30th days postoperatively

    The VAS was divided into 10 segments, and the patients were asked to rank their sense of burning level using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 10

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gazi University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of The Effectiveness of Different Methods for Healing a Palatal Donor Site After Harvesting a Free Gingival Graft

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Jun 25, 2018
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.