Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07650617

The Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavior Therapy on Rumination and Cognitive Avoidance in Teachers

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) skills training in reducing rumination and cognitive avoidance among middle-school teachers in Isfahan, Iran. Teachers often experience occupational stress that may contribute to maladaptive cognitive and emotional responses. DBT is a skills-based psychological intervention that aims to improve emotional regulation, mindfulness, distress tolerance, and interpersonal effectiveness.

Thirty-four eligible teachers were randomly assigned to either a DBT intervention group or a control group. Participants in the intervention group attended ten group sessions, while the control group received no intervention during the study period. Levels of rumination and cognitive avoidance were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and two-month follow-up using standardized questionnaires.

The study aimed to determine whether DBT skills training could reduce maladaptive cognitive processes and promote psychological well-being among teachers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

35 year–52 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch

Isfahan, 8481914411, Iran

About this study

Teachers are exposed to chronic occupational stress that may contribute to maladaptive cognitive processes, including rumination and cognitive avoidance. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), originally developed for emotion dysregulation, has increasingly been applied as a transdiagnostic and skills-based intervention in non-clinical populations. DBT emphasizes mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness skills that may enhance adaptive coping and psychological resilience.

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to examine the effects of a DBT skills training program among middle-school teachers in Isfahan, Iran. Participants assigned to the intervention group attended ten structured group sessions delivered in a face-to-face format. The program was based on Linehan's DBT skills training model and focused on developing practical strategies for emotional and cognitive self-regulation. Participants in the control group did not receive the intervention during the study period.

The study was designed to evaluate whether a structured DBT-based psychoeducational program could improve cognitive and emotional functioning and contribute to the growing evidence supporting the use of DBT in educational and non-clinical settings.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female middle-school teachers from districts 4 and 5 of Isfahan, Iran.
  • Age between 35 and 52 years.
  • Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Ability to attend the intervention sessions and complete study assessments.

Exclusion criteria

  • Absence from more than two intervention sessions.
  • Withdrawal of consent at any stage of the study.
  • Failure to complete post-intervention or follow-up assessments.

Treatment and study plan

Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Training

Behavioral

Participants assigned to the experimental group received a manualized Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) skills training program delivered in a face-to-face group format. The intervention consisted of ten sessions conducted over a five-week period. The program was based on Linehan's DBT model and included training in mindfulness, emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and interpersonal effectiveness skills. Sessions involved psychoeducation, group discussion, and practical exercises designed to improve cognitive and emotional self-regulation. Participants in the control group received no intervention during the study period.

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Avoidance

    Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (5 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.

    Change in cognitive avoidance scores measured using the Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire. Total scores range from 25 to 125, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive avoidance and worse outcomes.

  2. Rumination

    Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (5 weeks), and 2-month follow-up.

    Change in rumination scores measured using the Ruminative Response Scale. Total scores range from 22 to 88, with higher scores indicating greater rumination and worse outcomes.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jun 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.