Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07354685

The Effect of the Developed Psychological Resilience Program on Phubbing Behaviors and Communication Skills

The goal of this study is to determine whether a psychological resilience-based intervention program developed to prevent sociotelism is effective in nursing students. The study also aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the program.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does the psychological resilience development program reduce sociotelism behaviors among nursing students?

Does the program improve nursing students' communication skills?

Researchers will compare nursing students who participate in the psychological resilience development program with those in a control group who do not receive the intervention, in order to determine whether the program is effective in reducing sociotelism behaviors and enhancing communication skills.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 month–30 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergraduate nursing students aged 18 - 30 years old
  • Voluntary participation
  • Ability to understand and complete self-report questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of a diagnosed severe psychiatric disorder
  • Current participation in another psychological intervention program.

Treatment and study plan

Psychological Resilience Development Program for Phubbing

Behavioral

This study evaluates the effectiveness of an 8-module psychological resilience development program designed to address phubbing behaviors among participants. The program was structured to enhance individuals' capacity to cope with digital distractions and strengthen adaptive psychosocial skills in interpersonal contexts. The intervention aims to improve communication skills, increase psychological resilience levels, and reduce sociotelism tendencies by promoting mindful technology use, emotional regulation, and awareness of face-to-face interaction dynamics. The impact of the program is assessed through pre- and post-intervention measurements, allowing for a systematic examination of changes in participants' communication competencies, resilience capacities, and sociotelism levels following completion of the eight modules.

Primary outcomes

  1. Communication Skills Level

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-module intervention (post-intervention)

    The Communication Skills Scale was developed by Fidan Korkut Owen and Aslı Bugay in 2014. The scale consists of 25 items organized into four subdimensions. Higher scores indicate higher levels of communication skills. For both the total scale and its subdimensions, mean item total scores are used.

    The scale is a 5-point Likert-type instrument, rated as follows:

    (1 = Never, 2 = Rarely, 3 = Occasionally, 4 = Often, 5 = Always).

    The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Communication Skills Scale was found to be 0.88, indicating high internal consistency. Total scores range from 25 to 125, with higher scores reflecting more advanced communication skills

    The four subdimensions of the scale and their corresponding item numbers are as follows:

    • Communication Relationships and Basic Skills
    • Self-Expression
    • Active Listening and Nonverbal Communication
    • Willingness to Communicate
  2. Psychological Resilience Level

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) Immediately after the 8-module intervention (post-intervention)

    Psychological resilience will be assessed using the Psychological Resilience Scale for Adults. The scale consists of 33 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Never to 5 = Always). Total scores range from 33 to 165, with higher scores indicating greater psychological resilience.

  3. Levels of Phubbing Behavior and Exposure to Phubbing Level

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after the 8-module intervention (post-intervention)

    In this study, the Phubbing Behaviors Scale was used as the data collection instrument. The scale was originally developed by Chotpitayasunondh and Douglas (2018) and was adapted into Turkish by Derya Orhan Göksun (2019), who conducted its validity and reliability analyses. The scale consists of two sections and is rated on a 7-point Likert scale.

    The first section is the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP), which consists of 15 items grouped into four subdimensions. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for this section was 0.78. Total scores range from 15 to 105, calculated by summing the Likert-scale responses provided by the participants. All items in this section are negatively worded within the context of social norms and general acceptance; therefore, higher total scores indicate more negative outcomes, reflecting higher levels of phubbing behavior. In summary, as the total score increases, the the level of phubbing behavior also increases.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hatice Bebis Prof. Dr., PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

5428746831

Mert Hızlıoğluları, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

5338883147

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eastern Mediterranean University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of a Psychological Resilience Program for Phubbing on Nursing Students' Communication Skills and Phubbing Behaviors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 21, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.