Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06937489

The Effect of the Changes in Cylinder Power and Axis of Toric Soft Contact Lenses on the Visual Quality, Satisfaction and Vision Acceptability in Astigmatic Subjects

Toric SCL combined spheric lens power with cylinder power and axis. However, in Indonesia, the availability of cylinder power and axis parameter variations between products are still narrow, with stock-keeping units (SKUs) options only between 0.75-2.75 DC and 10o-180o for power and axis, respectively. Providing accurate toric SCL prescription for astigmatism patient in Indonesia remains a challenge for ophthalmologists and generally could not be achieved. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of power undercorrection and axis misalignment on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual clarity, visual satisfaction, and vision acceptability.

The inclusion criteria for the trial, include: (1) 20 to 40 years of age without the need for presbyopic correction, (2) mild to moderate myopia patients, sphere between -1.00 and - 6.00 D combined with cylinder between -0.75 to -3.00 DC in at least one eye, (3) corrected distance visual acuity (VA) of with Toric SCL 6/15 or better bilaterally. Exclusion criteria include: (1) a history of contact lens use 6 months prior to trial, (2) history of previous ocular surgery, (3) anterior and posterior segment abnormalities, (4) manifest strabismus or dry eye, and (5) ocular and systemic diseases that would preclude CL wear or decrease visual acuity; and pregnancy or lactation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Astigmatism Eye Diseases Refractive Errors

Age range

20 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia

Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia

About this study

Detailed Procedure

Baseline refraction and clinical manifestations were determined during initial visit which each participants attended three assessment visits on a separate day. Baseline visual acuity was measured using Snellen chart, contrast sensitivity was measured using Pelli-Robson chart, and VAS (Visual Analog Scale, with 10 being the best indicator) was utilized to measure monocular clarity (1=blurred, 10=clear), satisfaction (1=satisfied, 10=unsatisfied), and vision acceptability (1=unacceptable, 10=perfectly acceptable).

Participants were fitted on their diseased eye, which could be unilateral or bilateral, with the toric SCL. Lens fit (corneal coverage, centration, movement, and rotation) was examined using slit-lamp examination. Regarding lens rotation, modification of the toric SCL axis was determined using the "LARS" (left add, right subtract) method for proper contact lens fitting. The shifting axis in toric SCL was assessed by observing the shift marker on contact lens in a clockwise or anticlockwise direction; then if any, it was corrected using LARS formula. A disposable toric lens investigated in this work is 2-Weeks Acuvue Moist for Astigmatism (2WAMfA), a common hydrogel conventional toric lenses.

The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 20 to 40 years of age without the need for presbyopic correction
  • mild to moderate myopia patients, sphere between -1.00 and - 6.00 D combined with cylinder between -0.75 to -3.00 DC in at least one eye
  • corrected distance visual acuity (VA) of with Toric SCL 6/15 or better bilaterally.

Exclusion criteria

  • a history of contact lens use 6 months prior to trial
  • history of previous ocular surgery
  • anterior and posterior segment abnormalities
  • manifest strabismus or dry eye
  • ocular and systemic diseases that would preclude CL wear or decrease visual acuity; and pregnancy or lactation.

Treatment and study plan

Hydrogel conventional toric lenses with -10° axis misalignment

Device

The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.

Hydrogel conventional toric lenses with +10° axis misalignment

Device

The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.

Hydrogel conventional toric lenses with undercorrection of 0.5 D

Device

The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.

Hydrogel conventional toric lenses with undercorrection of 1.0 D

Device

The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual acuity

    Time frame: Week 1 and week 2

    Visual acuity was measured using Snellen chart and reported with logMAR

  2. Contrast sensitivity was measured using Pelli-Robson chart,

    Time frame: Week 1 and week 2

    Contrast sensitivity was measured using Pelli-Robson chart,

  3. Monocular clarity

    Time frame: Week 1 and week 2

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale, with 10 being the best indicator) was utilized to measure monocular clarity (1=blurred, 10=clear)

  4. Visual satisfaction

    Time frame: Week 1 and week 2

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale, with 10 being the best indicator) was utilized to measure visual satisfaction (1=satisfied, 10=unsatisfied)

  5. Vision acceptability

    Time frame: Week 1 and week 2

    VAS (Visual Analog Scale, with 10 being the best indicator) was utilized to measure vision acceptability (1=unacceptable, 10=perfectly acceptable).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indonesia University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Apr 22, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.