Klinik für Alterspsychiatrie und Psychotherapie UPD Bern
Bern, 3000, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT03475446
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) on a cognitive training in healthy elderly and memory impaired participants. In order to assess these effects different memory and attention tasks will be performed before and after the training as well as after 6 and 12 months.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bern, 3000, Switzerland
As other studies have shown, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can improve the outcome of memory tasks in Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy older adults. Only few studies have investigated the effect of the combination of tDCS and a simultaneous cognitive training and to the investigators' knowledge there is no comparison of tDCS and transcranial alternating current (tACS) effects during a cognitive training or for different populations. With results from this study existing trainings can be optimised. In total 180 participants are planned to be included in this study. This number is based on a g*Power estimation. According to this estimation the study has to include 153 participants. Regarding similar studies the investigators assume a dropout rate of 15% resulting in a total of 180 participants (60 AD patients, 60 MCI patients and 60 healthy older adults) This number should make it possible to find the expected mild effects reported in literature.
A mixed-effects ANOVA model with the between-subjects factor stimulation (tDCS, tACS, sham) and the within-subjects factor time will be computed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the real anodal tDCS in the group of healthy elderly.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the real tACS in the group of healthy elderly.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the sham tES in the group of healthy elderly.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the real anodal tDCS in the MCI group.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the real tACS in the MCI group.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the sham tES in the MCI group.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the real anodal tDCS in the AD group.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the real tACS in the AD group.
A neuroConn DC-Stimulator PLUS (neuroCare Group, Ilmenau, Germany) will be used for the sham tES in the AD group.
Time frame: Pre-training (40-0 days before start of training)
The primary outcome is the change in memory performance.Therefore, changes in the MMS/MoCA score (scores: 0-30, higher scores indicate better functioning of global memory and cognition) and a composite memory score will be assessed. The composite memory score is calculated with the scores of the episodic, prospective and working memory tests.
Time frame: Post-training (0-40 days after end of training)
The primary outcome is the change in memory performance.Therefore, changes in the MMS/MoCA score (scores: 0-30, higher scores indicate better functioning of global memory and cognition) and a composite memory score will be assessed. The composite memory score is calculated with the scores of the episodic, prospective and working memory tests.
Time frame: Follow-up 1 (6 months after end of training)
The primary outcome is the change in memory performance.Therefore, changes in the MMS/MoCA score (scores: 0-30, higher scores indicate better functioning of global memory and cognition) and a composite memory score will be assessed. The composite memory score is calculated with the scores of the episodic, prospective and working memory tests.
Time frame: Follow-up 2 (12 months after end of training)
The primary outcome is the change in memory performance.Therefore, changes in the MMS/MoCA score (scores: 0-30, higher scores indicate better functioning of global memory and cognition) and a composite memory score will be assessed. The composite memory score is calculated with the scores of the episodic, prospective and working memory tests.
Time frame: Pre-training (40-0 days before start of training)
Changes in the subjective measure mood, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Post-training (0-40 days after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure mood, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Follow-up 1 (6 months after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure mood, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Follow-up 2 (12 months after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure mood, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Pre-training (40-0 days before start of training)
Changes in the subjective measure quality of life, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Post-training (0-40 days after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure quality of life, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Follow-up 1 (6 months after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure quality of life, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Follow-up 2 (12 months after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure quality of life, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Pre-training (40-0 days before start of training)
Changes in the subjective measure activities of daily living, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Post-training (0-40 days after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure activities of daily living, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Follow-up 1 (6 months after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure activities of daily living, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: Follow-up 2 (12 months after end of training)
Changes in the subjective measure activities of daily living, assessed with questionnaire.
Time frame: 40-20 days before the start of the training with a questionnaire sent by mail.
Years of education is a possible predictor of the success of the training and will be assessed once.
Time frame: 40-20 days before the start of the training with a questionnaire sent by mail.
Cognitive reserve is a possible predictor of the success of the training and will be assessed once.
Time frame: 40-20 days before the start of the training with a questionnaire sent by mail.
Personality is a possible predictor of the success of the training and will be assessed once.
Time frame: 30-3 days before the start of the training with a questionnaire in the pre-assessment.
Motivation is a possible predictor of the success of the training and will be assessed once.
University of Bern
Other
Modulating the Effect of a Computerized Cognitive Training With Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With and Without Memory Impairment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05364307
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03682185
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Alzheimer Disease
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05514756
Alzheimer Disease, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Dublin, Ireland
View Trial DetailsNCT05462977
Affect, Alzheimer Disease
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details