Dokuz Eylül üniversitesi
Izmir, Balcova, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06896487
Musculoskeletal disorders are among the health problems that most distract individuals from work life in both developed and developing countries. According to the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study, when evaluated in terms of burden of disease, life expectancy with disability and rehabilitation needs, low back and neck pain are at the top of this category. According to the Health Research Report published by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) in 2019, musculoskeletal disorders in the neck region are more common in women and were determined as the musculoskeletal disorder with the highest increase by 12.9% between 2016 and 2019.
It has been reported that in approximately half of individuals with neck pain, this pain recurs and becomes chronic. Factors such as sedentary lifestyle, history of low back pain, being female, anxiety disorders, sleep problems and smoking are thought to contribute to the chronicization of pain. Chronic neck pain is defined as pain in the neck region lasting longer than twelve weeks.
Cervical muscle activations have been monitored with EMG studies in the patient population with neck pain from past to present and altered cervical muscle activations have been reported in individuals with neck pain. The main muscle groups in which muscle activation has been monitored with superficial EMG and changes have been found in individuals with neck pain are upper trapezius, sternocelidomastoid, cervical erector spinal muscles and thoracic erector spinal muscles. On the other hand, it is still debated whether these muscle activation changes are the cause or a normal consequence of chronic neck pain.
In recent years, it has been reported in the literature that EMG Biofeedback studies have been included in patients with neck pain, but more studies are needed to determine its superiority to conventional applications. In the light of this information, in our study titled "The Effect of Superficial EMG Biofeedback Training on Muscle Activation, Proprioception, Reaction Time and Upper Extremity Functions in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain; Randomized controlled study", both the effect of EMG Biofeedback muscle training application on the symptoms of patients with neck pain will be investigated and data that will be a reference for future studies in this field will be obtained.
The study in patients with chronic neck pain had two aims. To investigate the effect of EMG Biofeedback relaxation training (upper trapezius muscle) combined with active EMG Biofeedback exercises + routine exercise program on muscle activation, pain, proprioception, reaction time and upper extremity function in patients with neck pain. To compare the effects of EMG Biofeedback training with standard physiotherapy program.
Hypotheses of the study; H0: EMG Biofeedback relaxation training (upper trapezius muscle) combined with active EMG Biofeedback exercises + routine exercise program has no effect on muscle activation, pain, proprioception, reaction time and upper extremity function in patients with neck pain H1: EMG Biofeedback relaxation training (upper trapezius muscle) combined with active EMG Biofeedback exercises + routine exercise program has an effect on muscle activation, pain, proprioception, reaction time and upper extremity function in patients with neck pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Izmir, Balcova, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
We think that 6 weeks of superficial EMG Biofeedback muscle training and relaxation training given to the participants in this study will improve the patient's upper trapezius activation and voluntary contraction performance.
The conventional rehabilitation group of this study received ultrasound, TENS and hot pack application 3 days a week for 6 weeks.
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Visual analog scale was used to assess pain.
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Time frame: Week of enrollment and end of the treatment at 6th weeks and 12 th weeks
Pervin Yeşiloğlu
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07710950
Chronic Neck Pain, Mechanical Neck Pain
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07005076
Chronic Neck Pain, Exercise Training Therapy
Merkez, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07639671
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Radicular Pain
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07266610
Chronic Neck Pain, Craniomandibular Disorders
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details