Hicran Dönmez Özkan
Merkez, Aydın, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT05052814
This randomized clinical trial compares the effects of intracanal medicaments on the incidence of postoperative pain and flare-up in asymptomatic retreatment cases.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Merkez, Aydın, Turkey (Türkiye)
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intracanal medicaments on the incidence of postoperative pain and flare-up in asymptomatic retreatment cases.
Methods: One hundred twenty patients with asymptomatic teeth with single-root, single-canal without spontaneous pain or swelling were included in the present study. All patients were previously undergone endodontic treatment but still had periapical radiolucencies. Patients were randomly and equally divided into three groups in which stratified randomization was performed based on the gender and the age of the patients. Intracanal medicaments were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2), chlorhexidine gel (CHX), calcium hydroxide, and chlorhexidine gel combinations were used as intracanal medicaments in the present study. Postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using a visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were evaluated during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
p.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Two different root canal medicaments and their combination were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Afterward, postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using the visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were married during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
Two different root canal medicaments and their combination were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Afterward, postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using the visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were married during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
Two different root canal medicaments and their combination were placed into the root canals following the removal of previous root canal fillings and re-instrumentation. Afterward, postoperative pain scores were recorded at 6 and 12 hours and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days using the visual analog scale (VAS). Sensitivity on percussion, spontaneous pain, swelling, and antibiotic and analgesic requirements of the patients were married during clinical examinations performed postoperatively after 2 and 7 days.
Time frame: 6 th hours
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 12 th hour
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 24 th hour
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 2nd days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 3th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 4th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 5th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 6th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Time frame: 7th days
Based on the VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), the pain levels of the patients were assessed. The scale consisted of a 100-mm-long line divided into 10 equal intervals from 0 (no pain) to 100 (very severe pain). Every patient was asked to mark his or her perceived postoperative pain level on the line.
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Other
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Three Different Root-canal Medicaments on Post-operative Pain in Re-treatment Cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04604314
Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontically Treated Teeth
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04691050
Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontically Treated Teeth
Tokat Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06795282
Dental Pulp Disease, Dental Pulp Diseases
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06304259
Dental Pulp Diseases, Endodontic Disease
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details