Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01494623

The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Working Memory

Deficits in working memory (WM) performance are the most significant cognitive impairments in schizophrenia (SCZ). It has also been shown that WM performance is contingent on the cortex synchronization, a process that relies on brain inhibition. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has been demonstrated as an effective treatment for patients with SCZ and has been shown to increase brain inhibition and improve cognitive performance. In this study the investigators intend to:

* evaluate rTMS as a treatment for WM deficits in SCZ * evaluate rTMS as a method to increase WM performance in healthy individuals * determine if improvements in WM performance are related to enhanced synchronization of brain networks * determine whether genetic polymorphisms predict cortical function and treatment response * evaluate the influence of rTMS treatment on brain structure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Toronto, Ontario, M6J 1H4, Canada

About this study

To directly investigate whether enhanced gamma synchrony mediates rTMS enhancement of WM in patients with SCZ, and in healthy individuals the investigators propose the following study. The relationship between the improvements in WM performance and increased gamma synchrony following rTMS over the DLPFC will be investigated. Moreover, using statistical models, the investigators will further examine whether increased gamma synchrony mediates WM improvement in these patients. Therefore, in this study the investigators hope to clarify the neurophysiological mechanisms through which rTMS exerts its therapeutic effects on WM performance and develop rTMS as a novel therapeutic tool to enhance the treatment options available for one of the core cognitive deficits in this disorder.

There is considerable evidence to support the fact that WM deficits in schizophrenia are heritable and have a strong genetic component. This evidence emerges from genetic association studies, and studies demonstrating that unaffected relatives of schizophrenia patients also suffer WM deficits. Therefore, treatment response to rTMS may be at least partly contingent on genetic variation within each individual. In particular, GABAergic genes that code for GABAergic proteins which largely determine cortical inhibition may play a key role in treatment response to rTMS over the DLPFC. However, several other gene systems that interact with the GABAergic system may also play a role, and would also merit investigation. Similarly brain structure may also determine treatment response. For instance, volume or thickness of the DLPFC and DLPFC related circuitry has been shown to play a role in WM performance, and therefore, may be a biomarker of treatment response.

Objective 1: To improve WM in patients with SCZ, and in healthy individuals using rTMS.

Hypothesis 1:20 Hz rTMS over the DLPFC will be superior to sham stimulation in improving WM performance in patients with SCZ, and healthy individuals.

Objective 2: To evaluate if high frequency rTMS results in enhanced gamma synchrony SCZ and healthy individuals.

Hypothesis 2: 20 Hz rTMS over the DLPRC will be superior to sham stimulation at increasing gamma synchrony in patients with SCZ, and healthy individuals.

Objective 3: To determine if the rTMS induced increase in gamma band synchrony mediates the therapeutic effects of rTMS on WM performance in patients with SCZ and healthy individuals.

Hypothesis 3: Increased gamma band synchrony will be shown to mediate the therapeutic effects of rTMS on WM performance in SCZ and healthy individuals.

Objective 4: To test whether key polymorphisms in the GABAergic system, and related gene systems determine γ oscillatory activity and WM improvement following rTMS.

Hypothesis 4: GABAergic gene and related gene polymorphisms will determine variation in γ oscillatory activity and WM performance following rTMS treatment.

Objective 5: To examine whether brain structure is a biomarker of treatment response to rTMS Hypothesis 5: Increase in cortical thickness at DLPFC and in microstructural integrity in cortico-cortical white matter tracts connecting to DLPFC will correlate with n-back task performance after rTMS treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

for Schizophrenia Subjects:

  • Voluntary and competent to consent
  • SCID-IV Diagnosis of Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder
  • Between the ages of 18 and 85

Inclusion criteria

for Healthy Subjects:

  • voluntary and competent to consent
  • between the ages of 18-85
  • considered a healthy individual free of psychopathology based on the Personality Assessment Inventory
  • right-handed determined by the TMS screening and demographic form
  • self-reported non-smoker
  • do not have a self-reported concomitant major medical or neurologic illness
  • if a woman of childbearing potential, must be on an effective means of birth control determined through completion of the TMS screening and demographic form.

Exclusion criteria

for both Healthy Controls and Schizophrenia Subjects:

  • Have a DSM-IV history of substance abuse or dependence in the last 6 months
  • Have a concomitant major and unstable medical or neurologic illness
  • Have a history of seizures
  • Have a first degree relative with a history of a seizure disorder
  • Are pregnant
  • Have any clinically significant EEG activity indicating an increased risk of seizure, as confirmed by a neurologist.

Treatment and study plan

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Device

Magnetic pulses to specified brain regions.

Other names: MagPro X100 Series (Medtronic A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark)

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome measure will be the performance on the N-back working memory task.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    Specifically, we will evaluate if rTMS results in changes to the number of correct answers, omissions and errors as well as reaction times.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Increase in gamma band synchrony

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    To ascertain whether high frequency rTMS is superior to sham stimulation in increasing gamma band synchrony our analysis will examine stimulus-locked changes in spectral power, phase, and coherence between electrodes.

  2. Brain Imaging Changes

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    For brain imaging we will test for group differences using: (1) cortical thickness (2) volumetric measures, (3)diffusion based measures. Statistical tests measuring these differences will be conducted at baseline and at the conclusion of the study. We will control for possible effects of neuroleptic medication on MRI measures by regressing mean dosage levels multiplied by number of years on medication, for each of five classes of medication (typical neuroleptics, atypical neuroleptics, antiparkinsonian anticholinergics, lithium, benzodiazepines)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Treating Working Memory Deficits in Patients With Schizophrenia Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Dec 19, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.