The Effect of Reflexology on Lactation and Postpartum Comfort for Cesarean-delivery Primiparous Mothers

Immediately after cesarean birth, many women suffer from breastfeeding problems due to pain, fatigue, activity intolerance, anesthesia, and delayed onset of lactation. Because of these avoidable problems, the baby cannot get enough breast milk, and mothers' postpartum comfort decreases.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of reflexology on lactation and postpartum comfort in primiparas giving births through cesarean section.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Breastfeeding Behavior Breast Feeding Feeding Behavior Lactation Failure Nursing Caries Postpartum Reflexology

Age range

18 year–41 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted with 100 women with first birth through cesarean section were investigated between May 2016 and May 2017. Expectant mothers were randomly included into an intervention and a control group. The intervention group consisted of mothers for whom reflexology was performed three times per day for 30 min every eight hours.

With face-to-face interviews, all participants were informed about the design, content and methods to be used in the study, and the sociodemographic data obtained self-reportingly from the primiparas were recorded. The data were collected between May 2016 and May 2017. In collecting the data related to primiparas and infants, a questionnaire structured by the researchers in light of literature was used, as well as The breastfeeding charting system (LATCH), The visual analogue scale (VAS) for signs of onset of lactation and The postpartum comfort questionnaire (PPCQ).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

primiparas delivering through CS,
at the age of 18 and over,
at ≤37 gestational weeks
with one-fetus birth,
with stable vital signs,
those delivering under general anesthesia,
except for CS and spinal/epidural anesthesia,
with ability of communication in Turkish, and those accepting to participate into the study voluntarily.

Exclusion criteria

primiparas with infectious diseases such as shingles, fungus, eczema, warts and callus in the intervention group,
those with local infections like abscess,
open lesion/wound, scar tissue, edema, hematoma, thrombophlebitis, deep vein thrombosis, coagulopathy, mass, varicosis, deformities on toes, recent fractures or dislocations, tearing of fascia and tendons,
and with psychiatric disorders such as anxiety and depression, were excluded out of the study.

Treatment and study plan

Reflexology

Other

Reflexology: foot massage

Primary outcomes

The breastfeeding charting system (LATCH)

Time frame: Change from The breastfeeding charting system (LATCH) scores at first, second and third days after cesarean.

As nurses are more likely to use a subjective criterion as poor /fair/ well to document and assess breastfeeding, LATCH provides a systematic method to collect information about individual breastfeeding sessions. The system is scored between 0 and 5 to indicate the key components of breastfeeding. Each breastfeeding session is assessed in light of the total score. A total score lower than 10 means that mothers are to be supported (Yenal and Okumus, 2003; Demirhan, 1997; Jensen et al., 1995). The letters of the acronym LATCH designate separate areas of assessment: ''L'' for how well infants latch onto the breast, ''A'' for the amount of audible swallowing,''T'' for mothers' nipple type, ''C'' for mothers' level of comfort, ''H'' for the amount of support given for infants to hold the breast.
The visual analogue scale (VAS) for signs of onset of lactation

Time frame: Change from The visual analogue scale (VAS) for signs of onset of lactation scores at first, second and third days after cesarean

VAS was used to evaluate breast changes during the onset of lactation by mothers' self-reports, as in the study performed by Mauri et al. (2015). Initial signs of lactation were assessed as breast-tension, increase in breast-heat and breast-pain, and scored from 0 (no signs) to 10 (most powerful signs) (Mauri et al., 2015).
The postpartum comfort questionnaire (PPCQ)

Time frame: At the end of 3rd day, The postpartum comfort questionnaire (PPCQ) was performed for all mothers.

Constituted by Kolcaba in 1992, the General Comfort Scale (GCS) was adapted to Turkish by Kuguoglu and Karabacak in 2004 (Kuguoglu and Karabacak, 2008). Based on the Turkish version of GCS, the Postpartum Comfort Questionnaire (PPCQ) was developed by Karakaplan and Yildiz in 2010. Factor analyses were assigned to test the validity and reliability of GCS. The internal consistency in terms of reliability was tested, and the Cronbach's alpha was found as 0.78. PPCQ evaluates the physical, psychospiritual and sociocultural comfort of mothers after CS or vaginal delivery. These comfort areas also constitute the subdimensions of the scale. The scale using a 5-point Likert-type scoring includes 34 items, ranging from 5 (strongly agree) as the highest level of comfort to 1 (strongly disagree) as the lowest. Reverse coding is applied to the items with negative statements. The minimum and the maximum scores on the scale change between 34 and 170. The scores close to 170 indicate a high level of

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Selcuk University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Reflexology on Lactation and Postpartum Comfort for Cesarean-delivery

Important dates

Study start: 2016
Primary completion: 2017
Study completion: 2017
First posted: Sep 26, 2018
Registry last updated: Sep 26, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed