Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01490125

The Effect of QVA149 on Patient Reported Dyspnea in Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

This study assessed the effect of QVA149 on patient-reported dyspnea in moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Brussels, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study used a multi-center, randomized, blinded, double-dummy placebo controlled, three-period crossover design to assess the effect of once daily QVA149 q.d vs. placebo and tiotropium 18 μg q.d. in terms of patient reported dyspnea as assessed by Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI)/Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI)(SAC version) in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with moderate to severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Smoking history of 10 pack years
  • Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) between 30 - 80%
  • Patients must be able to use computer mouse and display
  • mMRC grade>2

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a history of long QT syndrome
  • Patients with Type I or uncontrolled Type II diabetes
  • Patients who have had a COPD exacerbation or respiratory tract infection within 6 weeks prior to screening
  • Patients with any history of asthma
  • Patients with pulmonary lobectomy, lung volume reduction surgery, or lung transplantation
  • Patients with concomitant pulmonary disease
  • Patients requiring long term oxygen therapy (>15 h a day)

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

QVA149

Drug

QVA149 110/50 μg hard non-gelatin capsule, inhalation/blister once a day via SDDPI

Tiotropium

Drug

Tiotropium 18 ug hard gelatin capsule, inhalation/ blister once a day via HandiHaler® device

Placebo to QVA149

Drug

Placebo 0 mg hard non-gelatin capsule, inhalation/ blister once a day via SDDPI

Placebo to tiotropium

Drug

Placebo 0 mg hard gelatin capsule, inhalation/ blister once a day via HandiHaler® device

Salbutamol/albuterol

Drug

salbutamol/albuterol (containing CFC-free propellant -HFA 134a) inhaler used as rescue medication when needed.

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Score After 6 Weeks of Treatment QVA149 Compared to Placebo

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

    Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) is part of the BDI/TDI questionnaire where participants indicated whether they improved or deteriorated since their Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). The BDI and TDI each had 3 domains: activities, tasks, and effort. BDI domains were rated from 0 (very severe) to 4 (none) and the rates summed for the total BDI score ranging from 0 to 12; the lower the score the worse the severity of dyspnea. TDI domains were rated from -6 (major deterioration) to 6 (major improvement) and the rates summed for the total TDI score ranging from -18 to 18. However, to ensure comparability with the TDI paper version, all TDI values were divided by 2 before the analysis. If data was missing or insufficient for any one of the domains a BDI/TDI was calculated. BDI = Baseline Dyspnea Index taken 75 min prior to the first dose in each treatment period. TDI = Transition Dyspnea Index taken after 6 weeks of treatment 75 min prior to the last dose in each treatment period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) Score After 6 Weeks of Treatment QVA149 Compared to Tiotropium

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

    Total Transient Dyspnea Index (TDI) is part of the BDI/TDI questionnaire where participants indicated whether they improved or deteriorated since their Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). The BDI and TDI each had 3 domains: activities, tasks, and effort. BDI domains were rated from 0 (very severe) to 4 (none) and the rates summed for the total BDI score ranging from 0 to 12; the lower the score the worse the severity of dyspnea. TDI domains were rated from -6 (major deterioration) to 6 (major improvement) and the rates summed for the total TDI score ranging from -18 to 18. However, to ensure comparability with the TDI paper version, all TDI values were divided by 2 before the analysis. If data was missing or insufficient for any one of the domains a BDI/TDI was calculated. BDI = Baseline Dyspnea Index taken 75 min prior to the first dose in each treatment period. TDI = Transition Dyspnea Index taken after 6 weeks of treatment 75 min prior to the last dose in each treatment period.

  2. Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5min-4h After First Dose and 6 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149 Compared to Placebo and Tiotropium

    Time frame: 5min-4hr at day 1 and week 6 post-dose

    Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were taken at 5 min- 4hr post-dose of day 1 and week 6. The standardized FEV1 Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated as the sum of trapezoids divided by the length of time.

  3. Standardized Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5min-4 Hrs After First Dose and 6 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149 Compared to Placebo and Tiotropium

    Time frame: 5min-4hr at day 1 and week 6 post-dose

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the total amount of air that can be exhaled by the patient after a full inhalation. The FVC was measured via spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards at 5 min-4 hr post dose of day 1 and week 6.

  4. Change From Baseline in The Capacity of Daily Living During the Morning (CDLM) Score Averaged Over 6 Weeks of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

    The Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning (CDLM) is a self-administered daily assessment. The CDLM asks COPD patients to (i) report their ability to carry out 6 morning activities and (ii) rate the difficulty in performing those activities on a five point Likert-type scale ranging from "not at all difficult" to "extremely difficult". For each of the six morning activities a score ranging from 0 (=so difficult that they could not carry out the activity by themselves) to 5 (not at all difficult to carry out the activity by themselves) is calculated by using the responses from the two questions for each activity. Daily CDLM is calculated using the scores average from the 6 morning activities. CDLM is calculated as the average daily CDLM score over 6 weeks of treatment. The change from baseline in CDLM score over 6 weeks is analyzed using a MIXED model with baseline CDLM score as a covariate. A CDLM score of 0.20 is considered to be a minimal clinically important difference.

  5. Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Used Over the 6 Weeks of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks

    The number of puffs of rescue medication taken by participants, were collected each day during the study via entries in e-diaries

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, 3-period Cross-over Study to Evaluate the Effect of QVA149 on Patient Reported Dyspnea in Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Using Tiotropium as an Active Control

Acronym: BLAZE

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Dec 12, 2011
Registry last updated
Dec 24, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.