Elective Surgery Center at Silkeborg Regional Hospital
Silkeborg, Region Midt, 8600, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT05464862
The aim of this study is to evaluate the Popliteal Plexus Block (PPB) effect on motor nerve branches of the sciatic and femoral nerve, when using different volumes of local anesthetics for PPB.
The hypothesis is that increasing the volume of anesthetics used for PPB will spread to the sciatic nerve leading to a reduced muscle strength in the lower leg and decreased nerve conduction velocity in the nerve to gastrocnemius muscle (the tibial nerve) and the nerve to anterior tibial muscle (the deep fibular nerve).
The effects will be evaluated by maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the lower leg muscles and by recordings of the compound muscle action potential (cMAP) of the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles - a motor nerve conduction study.
In addition, evaluation of PPBs effect on the femoral nerve is done by MVIC of the quadriceps femoris muscle, cMAP of the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis muscles and by a sensory nerve conduction study of the saphenous nerve.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Silkeborg, Region Midt, 8600, Denmark
A total number of 40 volunteers will be enrolled in the study. Each volunteer will receive two peripheral nerve blocks (one in each leg) on the day of participation. This will result in 80 peripheral nerve blocks. The types of nerve blocks given to each leg on each volunteer will depend on randomization.
The 80 nerve blocks are divided into five groups specified by type of nerve block, volume of anesthetic used, and respective numbers of legs used in the group. The groups and specifications are listed here:
Groups name, type of peripheral nerve block, study medication dosage and number of legs in the group:
Group FNB of SNB are performed unblinded and works as active comparatives for model control, in order to establish reference points for when a nerve is considered affected.
Prior to nerve block procedure , pre block assessments are obtained in the following order:
60 minutes after the block performance, post block assessments are done. Values are obtained in the same order as for the pre block assessments.
A peripheral intravenous line is inserted prior to the procedure of the peripheral nerve block is performed. At the discretion of the anesthetist, up to 20 mg Propofol IV may be provided to ease the patient during the nerve block procedure. The volunteer is monitored with continuous electrocardiography and pulse oximetry for the first 30 minutes after block performance and clinically hereafter. Final check by an investigator to ensure the volunteer is ready to go home. If the muscle strength is reduced, the volunteer will not be sent home before the ability to walk safely with crutches is ensured.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Plexus Block using 10 ml of of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 10 mg/ml
Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Plexus Block using 20 ml of of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 10 mg/ml
Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Plexus Block using 30 ml of of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 10 mg/ml
Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Block using 20 ml of of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 10 mg/ml. Is used to find cut-off values that define affection of the femoral nerve.
Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve Block using 20 ml of of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 10 mg/ml. Is used to find cut-off values that define affection of the sciatic nerve.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C in post block MVIC by ankle plantarflexion, expressed as percentage change of the pre block value. MVIC is measured using a handheld dynamometer.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C in post block MVIC by ankle dorsiflexion, expressed as a percentage change of the pre block value. MVIC is measured using a handheld dynamometer.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C in post block MVIC by knee extension, expressed as a percentage change of the pre block value. MVIC is measured using a handheld dynamometer.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C, in the number of volunteers with affected cMAP of the gastrocnemius muscle, defined as sufficient change from pre block to post block. Cut-off value for sufficient change is determined by SNB group. cMAP is recorded using a motor nerve conduction study.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C, in the number of volunteers with affected cMAP of the tibialis anterior muscle, defined as sufficient change from pre block to post block. Cut-off value for sufficient change is determined by SNB group. cMAP is recorded using a motor nerve conduction study.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C, in the number of volunteers with affected cMAP of the vastus medialis muscle, defined as sufficient change from pre block to post block. Cut-off value for sufficient change is determined by FNB group. cMAP is recorded using a motor nerve conduction study.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C, in the number of volunteers with affected cMAP of the vastus lateralis muscle, defined as sufficient change from pre block to post block. Cut-off value for sufficient change is determined by FNB group. cMAP is recorded using a motor nerve conduction study.
Time frame: Measured pre block and at 45 minutes post block
Difference between group A, B and C in the number of volunteers with an affected sensory of the saphenous nerve, defined as change, from pre block to post block, in the volunteers ability to discriminate cold in the cutaneous area innervated by the medial crural cutaneous branches of saphenous nerve.
Charlotte Runge
Other
The Effect of the Popliteal Plexus Block on the Motor Function of the Leg - a Randomized, Controlled, Blinded Study in Volunteers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05601427
Anesthesia, Arthritis
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT00435357
Fractures, Bone, Knee Arthritis
Lyon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06470100
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Poznan, Poznań, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05566561
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details