Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Jette, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT04531917
Chronic pain in breast cancer survivors (BCS) is of considerable concern as it impacts the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and activities of daily living negatively. Over the past decades, awareness has raised the value of pain neuroscience education (PNE) in chronic pain. However, pain education remains underused in oncology and is often restricted to a biomedical management, which falls short in explaining persistent pain following cancer. Since PNE alone has rather small effect sizes, it should ideally be combined with a physical part, 'behavioural graded activity' (BGA). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of PNE with BGA compared to usual care on chronic pain in BCS.
A multi-centre, parallel, two-arm, double-blinded superiority with a three months intervention and two years follow-up will be conducted in 200 BCS with chronic pain. These will be randomly assigned to the intervention or usual care group. The intervention group will receive 6 sessions, in which PNE and BGA will be integrated. Whereas, the usual care group will receive an information leaflet regarding "Pain in and after cancer".
The primary objective of the present study is to examine whether the combination of PNE and BGA has an added value in decreasing the pain intensity compared to the usual care in BCS with chronic pain. The secondary objectives are to investigate whether the combination of PNE and BGA has the ability to reduce endogenous hyperalgesia and improve HRQoL compared to the usual care in BCS with chronic pain.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Jette, Brussels Capital, 1090, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) teaches patients about complex pain mechanisms known to be of importance in pain following breast cancer such as malfunctioning of the endogenous analgesic system and pain memories.
Patients in the experimental group will receive a behavioural treatment integrated within the concepts of operant conditioning. The purpose of Behavioural Graded Activity (BGA) is to increase the level of physical activity in the patient's daily lives in a time-contingent manner. On top of that, a healthy behaviour will be positively reinforced to consequently create a withdrawal of the attention towards pain behaviour, which is seen as an unreliable "alarm sign" in chronic pain patients. The implementation of BGA after PNE is described in the guideline reported by the International Association for the Study of Pain.
The content of the leaflet has a biomedical approach in explaining pain and providing information on the different pain medication classes. This leaflet is mostly available in waiting rooms of oncology centres and units of the Flemish part of Belgium.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation) and T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26)
Change between baseline (T1) and 3 months post-intervention (T3)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation)
Time frame: T2: after finishing intervention (week 13)
Time frame: T3: 3 months after intervention (week 26)
Time frame: T4: 1 year after intervention (week 64)
Time frame: T5: 2 years after intervention (week 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13) and T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26)
Assessed by the Medoc TSA-II Neurosensory Analyzer.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13) and T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26)
Assessed by the digital algometer, the Medoc TSA-II Neurosensory Analyzer and a manual blood pressure cuff.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13) and T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26)
Assessed by a manual blood pressure cuff.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13) and T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26)
Assessed objectively by conditioned pain modulation paradigm. A manual blood pressure is the conditioned stimulus, and the digital algometer and the Medoc TSA-II Neurosensory Analyzer are testing stimuli.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13) and T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26)
Assessed objectively by temporal summation paradigm. Ten testing stimuli will be applied, and subjects will be asked to rate their pain intensity on the first, fifth and tenth stimulus by using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: During the intervention and T2: after finishing intervention (w 13)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: During the intervention and T2: after finishing intervention (w 13)
Patient adherence for the treatment sessions will be calculated as the ratio of the number of treatment sessions that were actually carried out versus the number of prescribed sessions.
Time frame: During the intervention and T2: after finishing intervention (w 13)
Compliance will be calculated as the ratio of the total training duration (recorded in the logbooks) versus the prescribed total training duration, multiplied by 100.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation)
The diagnosis of Axillary Web Syndrome (AWS) will be made clinically.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation)
Lymphedema will be clinically diagnosed:
The Stemmer sign is positive if the assessor is unable to pinch (between his/her thumb and index finger) the dorsal skin of proximal phalanx (second or third finger). A positive test confirms the presence of primary and secondary lymphedema of the arm(s).
Single circumference measurement will only be performed if unilateral lymphedema is suspected. The arm circumference will be measured by a nylon tape measure with an accuracy of 1mm. The tape measure will be placed around the arm without tightening the tape at 30cm above the styloid process. Lymphedema is present if there is at least a difference of 10% between both arms.
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation)
To assess arthralgia the assessor will ask the patient two questions: "Do you experience symmetrical pain in the left and right shoulders, elbows, wrists, fingers, hips, knees, ankles and/or toes?" and "Do you experience morning stiffness? And if so, for how many minutes?"
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation)
The scar tissue will be clinically scored. First, the assessor will inspect the affected (and painful) region for possible skin damage and will be looking for: wound disruption, hematoma (bruising), abscess (cavity filled with pus) and seroma (cavity filled with transparent liquid). Second, the he will inspect the presence of a possible inflammation process of the scar tissue and will be looking for signs such as: warmth, redness, etc. Third, he will assess the mobility of the scar. During this manual test, will be assessed whether the scar is moving relative to the underlying layers, which will be scored on a 5-point Likert scale with response possibilities: (totally disagree, disagree, don't disagree/agree, agree, totally agree).
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation), T2: after finishing intervention (w 13), T3: 3 months after intervention (w 26), T4: 1 year after intervention (w 64) and T5: 2 years after intervention (w 116)
Time frame: T1: baseline (within one week before randomisation)
Self-administered questions about: gender, ethnicity, age, nationality, weight, height, civil state, mutuality, educational level, year of the breast cancer diagnosis, received breast cancer treatments, lymphedema, medication, other treatments, menopausal, hot flashes.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Other
The Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education and Behavioural Graded Activity Compared to Usual Care on Chronic Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors: a Randomised Controlled Trial
Acronym: BCS-PAIN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05494502
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05257876
Agnosia, Breast Diseases
Luzhou, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04586751
Anesthesia, Breast Cancer
Limassol, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT04730154
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
Bornem, Antwerpen, Belgium
View Trial Details