Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05359900

The Effect of Pain Education on Chiropractic Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain

Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide affecting just under 28 million people in the UK. Chronic pain conditions require a biopsychosocial rather than a biomedical model of care. Biomedical management lacks evidence of effectiveness but also has the potential to exacerbate the condition by raising fears and anxiety about potential pathological abnormalities.

Thus, the pre-registration phase is an important point where an individual's understanding of, and beliefs about, pain and people with pain may be shaped for the future. The need for improved and better education of healthcare professionals to support best practice for low back pain with the aim of integrating professionals' management of low back pain and fostering innovation in practice is well recognised. Pain education research with pre-registration chiropractors is lacking.

Therefore, this study aims to:

To compare the effect of two pain education intervention, through a multi-site randomised control trial, on the following three questionnaire based outcome measures:

1. Knowledge (understanding) of chronic pain 2. Attitudes towards chronic pain patients 3. Pain management behaviours

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

McTimoney College of Chiropractic, Abingdon, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In 2011 Briggs et al described pain education at undergraduate level for healthcare professionals as 'woefully inadequate'. Pain Neurophysiology Education (PNE) can improve undergraduates' pain understanding/management, however previous RCTs used single discipline groups and immediate follow-up. Investigation of the effectiveness of this education on students across the multi-professional team with medium-to-long-term follow-up will provide important new information on the generalisability of existing data and whether or not any changes in pain understanding/management are maintained over time.

This study aims to contribute to the development of neuromusculoskeletal chiropractic education by identifying whether or not this education, which aims to up skill healthcare professionals of the future, is effective and can change their behaviours in practice to enhance patient care in chronic pain management. PNE has been shown to be useful in patient care in conjunction with other treatment methods. If this intervention is successful in altering pain attitudes and knowledge in keeping with modern science then students may feel more confident and able to manage pain post qualification. The findings of this study will support or refute the addition of PNE into healthcare professional undergraduate programmes

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Current Chiropractic students enrolled at either: Teesside University; The Welsh institute of Chiropractic - University of South Wales; The AECC University College; McTimoney College of Chiropractic; London Southbank University
  • Willing to consent to attending two educational sessions followed by completing questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

  • Chiropractic students not actively enrolled at either: Teesside University; The Welsh institute of Chiropractic - University of South Wales; The AECC University College; McTimoney College of Chiropractic; London Southbank University
  • Participants will be excluded if they have previously received in depth education on red flags and or pain neurophysiology.
  • Students not willing to consent to attending two educational sessions followed by the completion of questionnaires

Treatment and study plan

Pain neuroscience education

Other

Pain neuroscience education lecture

Red Flag Education

Other

Red Flag education lecture

Primary outcomes

  1. The 12-item Revised Pain Neurophysiology Quiz (change assessed)

    Time frame: Immediate and 6-month follow-up

    This is a validated tool for assessing knowledge of pain physiology. Measures knowledge of pain physiology using a 12 point validated questionnaire. Low score is poor sign. Scores range from 0-12.

  2. The 10-item Red Flags knowledge questionnaire (change assessed)

    Time frame: Immediate and 6-month follow-up

    This is a questionnaire containing 10 yes/no questions to assess participants knowledge of red flags. Low score is a poor sign. Scores range from 0-10.

  3. The 13-item Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) (change assessed)

    Time frame: Immediate and 6-month follow-up

    this a validated measure of health care professionals attitudes towards the ability of patients with pain to function despite their pain. The Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale assesses attitudes and beliefs towards pain using a 13 item validated questionnaire. High score is a worse outcome. Scores range from 13-91.

  4. Case vignette (change assessed)

    Time frame: Immediate and 6-month follow-up

    Measures clinical practise behaviours in pain management. A validated proxy measure of clinical behaviour, MCQ weighted as appropriate or inappropriate according to current national clinical guidelines. A low score is considered good, and scores range from 4 to 20.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Semi-structured Interviews

    Time frame: 6-month follow-up

    Participants will be invited to take part in a semi-structured interview based in realtion to their knowledge retention and subject understanding.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Teesside University

Other

Collaborators

  • AECC University College
  • London South Bank University
  • McTimoney College of Chiropractic
  • University of South Wales

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Pain Education on Chiropractic Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain, Clinical Recommendations and Attitudes Towards People With Chronic Pain

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 4, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 20, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.