Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
NCT Number: NCT06547658
Mouth breathing is associated with increased airway resistance, pharyngeal collapsibility, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. It is commonly believed that closing the mouth can mitigate the negative effects of mouth breathing during sleep. However, the investigators propose that mouth breathing serves as an essential route bypassing obstruction along the nasal route (e.g., velopharynx). The present study investigates the role of mouth breathing as an essential route in some OSA patients and its association with upper airway anatomical factors.
Participants underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) with simultaneous pneumotach airflow measurements through the nose and mouth separately. During the DISE procedure, alternating mouth closure (every other breath) cycles were performed during flow-limited breathing.
The investigators evaluated the overall effect mouth closure on inspiratory airflow, and the change in inspiratory airflow with mouth closure across three mouth-breathing quantiles. The investigators also evaluated if velopharyngeal obstruction was associated with mouth breathing and a negative airflow response to mouth closure.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Closing the mouth during sleep by applying pressure to the mentum until the teeth were in occlusion, without altering the head position.
Time frame: 1 day - the intervention of mouth closure on the outcome is applied acutely on alternating breaths, such that the effect of mouth closure is assessed based on the experiment which occurs in a single day.
Change in airflow in the transition from mouth relaxed to mouth closed (intervention).
Time frame: 1 day - the intervention of mouth closure is applied acutely on alternating breaths, such that the effect of mouth closure on the outcome is assessed based on the experiment which occurs in a single day.
We analyzed the change in total inspiratory flow within three quantiles of roughly equal sample sizes based on oral breathing; quantile 1: oral airflow <0.05 L/min, quantile 2: oral airflow between 0.05 and 2.2 L/min, and quantile 3: oral airflow >2.2 L/min.
We also analyzed the effect of velopharyngeal obstruction on the change in total inspiratory airflow.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Other
The Heterogeneous Effects of Mouth Closure on Airflow in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04950894
Apnea, Apnea+Hypopnea
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04875364
Apnea, Dyssomnias
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05197855
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Grenoble, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06283017
Apnea, Dyssomnias
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
View Trial Details