Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06690073

The Effect of Motor Relearning Program on Functional Mobility in Stroke Rehabilitation.

1. To find out the effectiveness of conventional physiotherapy on improving functional mobility of lower extremity among chronic hemiplegic subjects. 2. To find out the effcctiveness of motor relearning program along with conventional physical therapy treatment on improving functional mobility of lower extremity among chronic hemiplegic subjects. 3. To find out the effectiveness of motor relearning program along with conventional physical therapy treatment over conventional physical therapy on improving functional mobility of lower extremity among chronic hemiplegic subjects.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

45 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

King Saud Medical City

Riyadh, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Khadijah Abdulrahman Alfaleh, MPT

CONTACT

[email protected]

00966543997595

About this study

After a careful monitor of inclusion and exclusion criteria and obtaining the institutional review board approval, the study was conducted by convenience sampling to select the suitable subjects, explaining the procedure to them, and got the written & oral informed consent. The study included two groups, each with 16 participants, which were allocated randomly to the control and experimental groups by lottery method. CPT was administered to the control group three times per week for six weeks (45 minutes per session). CPT treatments such as mat activities, assisted movements, weight-bearing strategies, and gymnasium training were given to the control group. At the same time, the experimental group received the previously mentioned CPT treatment as well as MRP for sitting to standing for six weeks, for a total duration of 45 minutes per session (30 minutes of CPT treatment followed by 15 minutes MRP), three sessions per week.

MRP of sitting and standing activities: The physical therapist was standing in front of the participant, who was sitting in an armrest-equipped chair. Participants were initially taught to keep their feet back, followed by forward trunk positioning. The physical therapist then aided the activity by holding the involved side of the hand and shoulder, where the subject had informed to execute anterior trunk bending more quickly, if the participant did not do it well or performed it in an abnormal manner. Finally, participants were instructed to press down through the affected foot, stand up as quickly as possible, and bring their hips anterior. The physical therapist suggested pressing down through the participant's knee along the shaft of the leg while moving it anteriorly through the affected foot.

MRP of standing to sitting: The participant was on his feet. The physiotherapist assisted the participant with anterior shoulder movement and knee bending at the start of the stand-to-sit movement. The physiotherapist then assisted the participant in keeping his weight on the affected leg while sitting. The subject progressed by standing and sitting with different seat heights, stopping in different parts of the range of motion, and varying speed. These variations in time and space were directed by the physical therapist. The number of reps and intensity of the exercise were classified according to the subject's capacity level and gradually increased as they improved. Subjects were given verbal feedback on weight distribution, performance speed, and encouragement.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The following subjects were included:

  • Right or left-sided chronic hemiplegic subjects.
  • More than six months after the onset of stroke.
  • Age group between 45-65 years of both genders.
  • Scored minimally 24/30 on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE).
  • Motor assessment scale of sitting to standing section.
  • Having normal visual perception.
  • Able to follow verbal commands.

Exclusion criteria

The following subjects were excluded:

  • Less than six months after the onset of stroke.
  • Unable to follow visual and oral commands.
  • The age group is below 45 years and more than 65 years.
  • Unilateral neglect.
  • Cognitive impairments (MMSE scores less than 24/30), or language deficits.
  • Any other neurological disorders and recent surgeries.
  • Previous exposure to MRP.

Treatment and study plan

Motor Relearning Program

Other

Total duration of the intervention is 45 minutes per session (30 minutes of CPT treatment followed by 15 minutes MRP), three sessions per week.

MRP of sitting and standing activities: The physical therapist will instruct the participant, who will be seated in an armrest-equipped chair, to keep their feet back and position their trunk forward.. The participant will then be guided to press down through the affected foot, stand up quickly, and move their hips forward. The therapist will suggest pressing down through the participant's knee along the leg while moving it forward through the affected foot.

MRP of standing to sitting: The participant will stand while the physiotherapist assists with anterior shoulder movement and knee bending at the start of the transition. The therapist will then help maintain weight on the affected leg while sitting. The participant will progress by standing and sitting at different seat heights, stopping at various points in the ROM, and changing speed.

Other names: Conventional Physical Therapy

Conventional physical therapy

Other

Conventional Physical Therapy (CPT) will be administered to the control group three times per week for six weeks (45 minutes per session). CPT treatments such as mat activities, assisted movements, weight-bearing strategies, and gymnasium training will be given to the control group.

Primary outcomes

  1. Barthel Index (BI)

    Time frame: week 0 and week 6

    The Barthel index, frequently used for stroke, gauges the level of help needed by an individual for ten mobility and daily living tasks. The total of all weighted individual item scores is converted into a single overall score, which ranges from 0 to 100. Consequently, "0" represents total independence from all ten activities. It takes 5 to 10 minutes to complete, has strong validity and reliability, and has minimal sensitivity for high-level functioning (Bhalerao et al., 2011).

  2. Motor Assessment Scale (MAS)

    Time frame: week 0 and week 6

    MAS is used to evaluate motor skills. MAS records eight functional activities: rolling in bed, sitting, sit to stand, walking, balancing in seated position, upper arm, hand, and wrist activities. The general tone of the body is noted in the ninth item. The scale for each item is 0 to 6. Hence, a score of 0 to 54 (normal function). According to WHO guidelines, MAS is supposed to be tested on the severity of disabilities. The MAS was highly dependable, with an average inter-rater reliability of .95 and an average test-retest reliability of 0.98 (Bhalerao et al., 2011).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Mohammed Mansour Al Shehri, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

00966-503946253

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Jazan

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • King Saud Medical City

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Motor Relearning Program on Functional Mobility in Stroke Rehabilitation

Acronym: MRP

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 15, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 15, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.