Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06023810

The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Treatment Adherence, Self-Efficacy, and Satisfaction in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

The rise in diabetes incidence has led to a corresponding increase in diabetes-related complications. Diabetic foot ulcers, a severe consequence of diabetes, have substantial impacts on patients, the social environment, overall well-being, and nursing procedures. Given this context, there is a clear necessity for interventions that motivate patients to adopt beneficial health behaviors and educate them in effectively managing diabetes-related complications. This study seeks to investigate the impact of Watson's motivational interviewing method, which is grounded in the human care theory, on enhancing treatment adherence, self-efficacy, and satisfaction levels among individuals suffering from diabetic foot ulcers.

Hypotheses of The Research H0: There is no difference in self-efficacy for diabetic foot care, diabetic foot care behavior, treatment adherence, and satisfaction between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education, and those who receive standard education.

H1: There is a difference in self-efficacy for diabetic foot care between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

H2: There is a difference in diabetic foot care behavior between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

H3: There is a difference in treatment adherence between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

H4: There is a difference in satisfaction between individuals with diabetic foot ulcers who receive Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing and diabetic foot care education and those who receive standard education.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Foot Ulcer, Diabetic Cardiovascular Diseases Diabetes Complications Diabetes Mellitus Diabetic Angiopathies Diabetic Foot Diabetic Neuropathies Endocrine System Diseases Foot Ulcer Leg Ulcer Skin Diseases Skin Ulcer Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases Vascular Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Derince Training and Research Hospital

Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) data, there are currently 425 million adults worldwide affected by diabetes, and it is projected to increase to 578 million by 2030 and 700 million by 2045. The increasing prevalence of diabetes has led to a rise in the frequency of complications arising from diabetes. The escalation in diabetes complications and their consequences is concerning. There is a need for interventions that encourage positive changes in health behaviors among patients and teach better management of diabetes-related complications.

Diabetic foot ulcer, a challenging complication of diabetes, has significant effects on physical, mental, social, and economic well-being, leading to reduced quality of life. It often necessitates prolonged hospitalizations, intensive treatment, and high medical costs. One of the nursing models frequently preferred today is the Human Care Theory, developed by Jean Watson between 1975 and 1979. The Human Care Theory is centered around providing quality care to patients and maintaining effective communication. Motivational Interviewing is a counseling approach developed by clinical psychologists William R. Miller and Stephen Rollnick.

The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing method on treatment adherence, self-efficacy, and satisfaction in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers. In this study, a randomized controlled experimental-control group experimental design will be used. The population of the study consists of patients who applied to Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital Internal Medicine outpatient clinics between June and October 2023, diagnosed with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, with first degree diabetic foot wound according to the Wagner classification. With the power analysis program G-Power 3.1.9.2, the sample size was calculated as 38 people (76) in each group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals with clear consciousness,
  • No communication problems,
  • Diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes,
  • Grade 1 diabetic foot ulcer according to the Wagner classification,
  • Receiving standard wound care,
  • Residing in the Kocaeli province,
  • No musculoskeletal or neurological disorders that could interfere with the study,
  • Individuals willing to participate and who sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria and those who decline to participate in the study will not be included.

Treatment and study plan

Watson's human care theory-based motivational interviewing method

Behavioral

The Motivational Interviewing Program based on Watson's Theory of Human Caring will be conducted over an 8-week period, with sessions taking place once a week. The initial session will have a duration of 60 minutes, while the subsequent weekly sessions will last for 30 minutes

Other names: Pre-post test

Primary outcomes

  1. Wagner's ulcer classification scale

    Time frame: at 1 week

    The Wagner classification divides ulcers based on the depth of the wound and the extent of gangrene. Grade 0, Skin intact but bony deformities lead to "foot at risk"; Grade 1, Superficial ulcer; Grade 2, Deeper, full thickness extension; Grade 3, Deep abscess formation or osteomyelitis; Grade 4, Partial Gangrene of forefoot; Grade 5; Extensive Gangrene.

  2. Wagner's ulcer classification scale

    Time frame: at 8 weeks

    The Wagner classification divides ulcers based on the depth of the wound and the extent of gangrene. Grade 0, Skin intact but bony deformities lead to "foot at risk"; Grade 1, Superficial ulcer; Grade 2, Deeper, full thickness extension; Grade 3, Deep abscess formation or osteomyelitis; Grade 4, Partial Gangrene of forefoot; Grade 5; Extensive Gangrene.

  3. Wagner's ulcer classification scale

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

    The Wagner classification divides ulcers based on the depth of the wound and the extent of gangrene. Grade 0, Skin intact but bony deformities lead to "foot at risk"; Grade 1, Superficial ulcer; Grade 2, Deeper, full thickness extension; Grade 3, Deep abscess formation or osteomyelitis; Grade 4, Partial Gangrene of forefoot; Grade 5; Extensive Gangrene.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale

    Time frame: at 1 week

    It was developed to assess individuals' perception of their ability to perform diabetic foot care activities. The lowest score obtainable from the scale is 0, and the highest is 90. An increase in scale score indicates a higher level of individual self-efficacy.

  2. Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale

    Time frame: at 8 weeks

    It was developed to assess individuals' perception of their ability to perform diabetic foot care activities. The lowest score obtainable from the scale is 0, and the highest is 90. An increase in scale score indicates a higher level of individual self-efficacy.

  3. Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

    It was developed to assess individuals' perception of their ability to perform diabetic foot care activities. The lowest score obtainable from the scale is 0, and the highest is 90. An increase in scale score indicates a higher level of individual self-efficacy.

  4. Medication Adherence Report Scale

    Time frame: at 1 week

    The scale consists of 5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores obtained from the items are summed to calculate the total test score. An increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates agreement, while a decrease indicates disagreement

  5. Medication Adherence Report Scale

    Time frame: at 8 weeks

    The scale consists of 5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores obtained from the items are summed to calculate the total test score. An increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates agreement, while a decrease indicates disagreement

  6. Medication Adherence Report Scale

    Time frame: at 12 weeks

    The scale consists of 5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Scores obtained from the items are summed to calculate the total test score. An increase in the total score obtained from the scale indicates agreement, while a decrease indicates disagreement

  7. Watson Patient Satisfaction Assessment Form According to Healing Processes

    Time frame: at 8 weeks

    The form consists of a total of six questions. The first five questions are scored on a scale of 1 to 7, with responses ranging from 'never' (1) to 'always' (7).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Okan University

Other

Collaborators

  • Sakarya University

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Watson's Human Care Theory-Based Motivational Interviewing on Treatment Adherence, Self-Efficacy, and Satisfaction in Individuals With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 5, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 5, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.