Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
NCT Number: NCT04453449
This prospective observational study aims to investigate the effect of midazolam sedation on the diagnostic validity of diagnostic lumbar medial branch block in patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylosis without myelopathy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
This prospective observational study aims to investigate the effects of midazolam sedation on the diagnostic validity of lumbar medial branch blocks in patients diagnosed with lumbar spondylosis without myelopathy. Patients typically receive two subsequent diagnostic blocks prior RFTC, to ensure that the correct location has been targeted. When patients achieve at least 80% pain relief after both diagnostic blocks, this is considered a positive result and they can proceed to receive RFTC. If patients have positive diagnostic blocks but their RFTC is not successful, this is considered a false positive diagnostic result. This study will determine 1) if a higher number of sedated patients proceed to radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) than non-sedated patients, and 2) if there are a higher number of false positive results in sedated patients. The hypothesis is that the use of midazolam sedation will increase the number of patients who perceive to have pain relief from their diagnostic block results, resulting in more patients proceeding to RFTC, and that there will be a higher number of false positive results in sedated patients. The primary outcome measure is the number of sedated versus non-sedated patients that have positive block results. A positive result will be calculated by having at least one NRS score that is at least 80% lower than their baseline NRS score in the 8 hours following lumbar MBB. The secondary outcome will be the number of false positive blocks in sedated versus non-sedated patients. After patients achieve 80% relief after each of the two diagnostic lumbar medial branch blocks and proceeds with lumbar RFTC, we will then collect NRS scores 24 hours after both diagnostic Lumbar MBB, and 4 weeks and at 8 weeks after the lumbar RFTC. If a patient has not received at least 50% reduction from their baseline NRS score by 8 weeks, this will be considered a false positive. A 7-point Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score 8 hours after each Lumbar MBB will also be collected, and at 4 weeks and 8 weeks after the lumbar RFTC, and any adverse effects patients experience. In addition, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be collected at 4 and 8 weeks after lumbar RFTC. The results of this study will help guide the use of sedation when performing diagnostic blocks on patients with lumbar spondylosis, in order to reduce the number of false positive blocks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Midazolam given as a sedative during diagnostic lumbar medial branch block
Other names: sedation
Time frame: 8 hours post diagnostic block
The number of positive diagnostic lumbar medial branch blocks (defined by at least 80% pain relief) in patients who receive midazolam sedation during their diagnostic blocks will be compared to patients who do not receive sedation.
Time frame: 2.5-3 months
The number of false positive diagnostic lumbar medial branch blocks (defined by at least 80% pain relief in the two diagnostic blocks, and then less than 80% pain relief following the subsequent radiofrequency thermocoagulation treatment) in patients who receive midazolam sedation during their diagnostic blocks will be compared to patients who do not receive sedation.
Time frame: 24 hours post diagnostic block; 4 and 8 weeks after radiofrequency thermocoagulation
The PGIC-7 scores of patients who received sedation will be compared to those who did not receive sedation during their diagnostic lumbar medial branch block.
Time frame: 4 and 8 weeks after radiofrequency thermocoagulation
The ODI scores of patients who received sedation will be compared to those who did not receive sedation during their diagnostic lumbar medial branch block.
Henry Ford Health System
Other
A Prospective Study Investigating the Effect of Midazolam Sedation on Diagnostic Lumbar Medial Branch Blocks
Acronym: MBB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05746143
Lumbar Spine Degeneration, Lumbar Spine Spondylosis
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05407064
Anxiety Disorders, Anxiety Generalized
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03491384
Anxiety, Anxiety Chronic
Boulder, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06076746
Anxiety Disorders, Anxiety Generalized
Ankara, Çubuk, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details