Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
NCT Number: NCT03467919
This is a non-surgical trial comparing the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with osteoarthritis treated with Intra-articular injection of Micro Fragmented Adipose Tissue versus conventional therapy of intra-articular injection of corticosteroid.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
This study will be a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes between intra-articular injection of Micro Fragmented Adipose Tissue and intra-articular injection of corticosteroid in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis of the knee. Micro Fragmented Adipose Tissue will be harvested at the subcutaneous tissue by lipoaspiration. Once fat tissue is obtained, it will be processed with minimal manipulation in the clinic room.
To be considered for participation in this study, patients must have radiographic evidence of mild to moderate osteoarthritis of medial and/or lateral weight-bearing compartments (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2 or 3). In addition, patients must meet several inclusion/exclusion criteria to be randomized and included in this study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Harvesting of Micro Fragmented Adipose Tissue with intra-articular injection
Other names: MFAT
Sham harvesting of adipose tissue without intra-articular injection. Intra-articular injection of corticosteroid.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient reported outcome measure that reports a normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms).
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient reported outcome measure that reports a normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms).
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient reported activity outcome measure on a scale of 0-100 (100 is best activity score)
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient reported quality of life outcome measure. VR-12 scores are reported as T-scores, which are standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the US population. Higher scores indicate better physical outcomes. Because this is a normalized range, there is theoretically no strict upper or lower bound. Most people will fall somewhere between 20-70 (+/- 3 SD).
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Patient reported quality of life outcome measure. VR-12 scores are reported as T-scores, which are standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the US population. Higher scores indicate better mental outcomes. Because this is a normalized range, there is theoretically no strict upper or lower bound. Most people will fall somewhere between 20-70 (+/- 3 SD).
Time frame: 12 months
Cartilage thickness on MRI using T2-weighted cartilage mapping
Stanford University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06693648
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07696195
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Hualien City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06459817
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06622512
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
View Trial Details