Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07403929

The Effect of Fermented Grape Juice Consumption on Fibromyalgia Patients

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a traditional grape-based fermented drink called hardaliye helps treat fibromyalgia in adult women. We will also learn whether adding hardaliye to a personalized nutrition plan works better than using either one alone.

The main questions are:

Does diet + hardaliye improve antioxidant status and lower oxidative stress more than diet only or hardaliye only? Does diet + hardaliye lower inflammation (TNF-α, IL-6, hs-CRP) and raise SIRT1 levels? Do these changes relate to less pain and better symptoms (fibromyalgia impact, gut symptoms, sleep, mood)? Are there benefits for weight, waist size, blood pressure, and blood lipids?

How the groups are compared:

Researchers will compare three groups for 8 weeks:

Diet + Hardaliye (personalized medical nutrition plan + one 200 mL bottle of hardaliye daily) Diet only (personalized medical nutrition plan) Hardaliye only (usual diet + one 200 mL bottle of hardaliye daily)

Participants will:

Drink one 200 mL bottle of hardaliye each day if assigned to Diet + Hardaliye or Hardaliye only Follow a personalized nutrition plan if assigned to Diet + Hardaliye or Diet only Visit the clinic at the start and end of the study, with brief check-ins around weeks 2, 4, and 6 Give blood samples before and after the 8-week period Complete short questionnaires on pain, fibromyalgia impact, gut symptoms, sleep, and mood Keep simple logs of daily drink intake and diet plan adherence, and report any side effects

Who can join:

Adult women (20-40 years) with doctor-diagnosed fibromyalgia and BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m² who meet the study's health and medication criteria.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

20 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Hospital

Istanbul, 34098, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This is a single-center, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial with three intervention conditions implemented over an 8-week period. After screening and baseline procedures, participants are assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio using a computer-generated block randomization sequence prepared by an independent researcher not otherwise involved in study conduct. Allocation concealment is maintained using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes opened only after confirming eligibility.

Due to the dietary nature of the interventions, participant-level blinding is not feasible. However, biospecimen handling and laboratory analyses are performed on coded (anonymized) samples; laboratory personnel remain blinded to group assignment and time point to minimize measurement bias.

Personalized medical nutrition therapy (MNT) is delivered using a standardized counseling framework with individualized targets. Resting metabolic rate is estimated using the Mifflin-St Jeor equation, and daily energy prescription is derived using physical activity level (PAL). Macro-distribution targets are standardized (10-20% protein, 45-60% carbohydrate, 25-30% fat), with saturated fat <7% of energy and trans fat <1% to align with guidance-based cardiometabolic risk control.

To reduce confounding from background polyphenol exposure, participants are instructed to avoid high-polyphenol red/purple fruits and vegetables according to protocol-defined lists; diet plans are structured as three main meals plus 2-3 snacks, and standardized exchange lists are provided to support adherence.

Hardaliye intervention (product handling and quality assurance): The study beverage is sourced from a traditional producer in Kırklareli and manufactured via controlled spontaneous fermentation without starter culture.

Hardaliye is dispensed in 200 mL bottles and distributed weekly under cold-chain conditions; participants are instructed to consume the beverage daily within a consistent intake window (16:00-16:30) to standardize exposure timing.

To ensure batch-to-batch consistency, each production batch undergoes predefined acceptance checks (°Brix, pH, and titratable acidity), and key compositional markers are measured post-bottling (total phenolics via Folin-Ciocalteu, total monomeric anthocyanins via pH-differential method, and antioxidant capacity via ABTS-based TEAC). Analytical repeatability is monitored (replicates/parallel runs; CV target <10% with repeat testing if unmet).

Batches outside acceptance ranges (e.g., °Brix 20.5-21.8; pH 3.50-4.00; acidity 0.68-0.75 g/100 mL; and protocol-defined total phenolic/anthocyanin targets) are excluded from participant distribution.

Where relevant, chromatographic confirmation (HPLC-DAD) is used to verify the phenolic profile of the study product and support linkage of total phenolic estimates to compound-level composition.

Participants complete an initial screening visit followed by a baseline (Day 0) visit and an end-of-intervention (Week 8) visit, with brief interim check-ins at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 for adherence review and systematic safety monitoring. Interim contacts include beverage count/log review, reinforcement of dietary counseling where applicable, and adverse event solicitation/documentation.

Adherence is operationalized as ≥80% compliance with the assigned beverage intake and/or nutrition therapy targets; intake and adherence are captured using simple participant logs reviewed at each contact.

Dietary intake is assessed using structured food records collected at multiple time points (7-day records at baseline, Week 4, and Week 8; and additional 3-day records during specified weeks) to quantify energy and nutrient intake and to support adherence monitoring. Nutrient analyses are performed using BeBIS software and interpreted against national reference intakes.

Dietary polyphenol exposure is estimated using Phenol-Explorer (v3.6) to derive total polyphenols and relevant subclasses; an antioxidant diet quality score (DAQS) is calculated based on intake of key antioxidant nutrients. Physical activity is monitored via 24-hour recall on diary days, and PAL is derived using activity-specific PAR values combined with Mifflin-St Jeor BMR estimates to support stability of lifestyle exposure during follow-up.

Fasting venous blood is collected at baseline and Week 8 and processed according to institutional standard operating procedures (timing, centrifugation, aliquoting, storage). Samples are labeled with coded identifiers to preserve analytical blinding, and assays are performed following validated methods and kit instructions with internal QC steps documented prospectively.

Data are captured in structured case report forms and reconciled against visit checklists, distribution records, and participant logs. Primary analyses follow an intention-to-treat approach. Group differences in change over time are evaluated using repeated-measures modeling (e.g., linear mixed-effects models including group, time, and group×time interaction), with prespecified sensitivity analyses based on adherence and protocol deviations; missing-data handling and multiplicity procedures are defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female, 20-40 years
  • BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m²
  • FM per 2016 ACR criteria; abdominal pain/cramp per SSS sub-item
  • MEDAS ≤5 at screening.
  • Willing to maintain habitual activity and comply with assigned intervention; able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Age <20 or >40
  • BMI ≤24.99 or ≥30.0 kg/m²
  • Professional athletes; night-shift workers
  • Food allergies; acute infection; antibiotic use within past month or during intervention.
  • Use (past 3 months) of dietary supplements; recent weight-loss or special diets (e.g., ketogenic).
  • Pregnancy/lactation; menopause.
  • Major hepatic/renal/cardiac/immune disease; chronic GI diseases; diabetes; CNS disorders; cancer; thyroid disease; severe pulmonary disease. Inflammatory arthritis/autoimmune disease impacting weight; medications including corticosteroids, estrogens, analgesics/anti-inflammatories, anti-diabetic or lipid-lowering drugs.
  • Severe psychiatric illness/substance use; heavy alcohol/smoking.
  • High recent intake of grape juice/molasses; excess tea/coffee (≥7 cups/day).
  • Adherence <80% to beverage or MNT during run-in/screening.

Treatment and study plan

Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT)

Behavioral

Individually tailored medical nutrition therapy delivered using a standardized counseling framework, energy prescription derived from predictive equations and physical activity level, with standardized macronutrient targets and follow-up reinforcement per protocol.

Hardaliye (200 mL/day)

Other

Traditional grape-based fermented beverage dispensed in 200 mL bottles; participants consume 200 mL once daily for the intervention period with standardized intake instructions and product handling.

Primary outcomes

  1. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in FIQR (0-100); lower scores indicate less symptom burden and better function.

  2. Pain Severity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in 0-10 cm VAS for average pain; lower scores reflect less pain.

  3. Gastrointestinal symptoms (Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, GSRS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) total score and subscale scores (abdominal pain, reflux, diarrhea, dyspepsia/indigestion, constipation).

    The GSRS includes 15 items, each rated for the past week on a 7-point scale (1 = no discomfort, 7 = very severe discomfort). Higher scores indicate worse gastrointestinal symptoms and lower scores indicate fewer/milder symptoms.

    Total score (sum of 15 items): 15-105 Abdominal pain subscale (Items 1, 4, 5; sum): 3-21 Reflux subscale (Items 2, 3; sum): 2-14 Dyspepsia/Indigestion subscale (Items 6, 7, 8, 9; sum): 4-28 Diarrhea subscale (Items 11, 12, 14; sum): 3-21 Constipation subscale (Items 10, 13, 15; sum): 3-21

  4. Sleep Quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in PSQI global score (0-21); lower scores indicate better sleep quality.

  5. Depressive Symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in BDI total score (0-63); lower scores indicate fewer depressive symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Antioxidant Status (TAS; μmol Trolox eq/L)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in circulating antioxidant capacity; higher values suggest stronger systemic antioxidant defense.

  2. Total Oxidant Status (TOS; μmol H₂O₂ eq/L)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in cumulative oxidant load; lower values indicate reduced oxidative pressure.

  3. Oxidative Stress Index (OSI = TOS×100 / TAS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Ratio index of oxidant burden to antioxidant capacity; lower values denote better redox balance.

  4. Plasma Malondialdehyde (MDA; TBARS method)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in lipid peroxidation marker; lower levels indicate less oxidative membrane damage.

  5. Serum 8-Hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in DNA oxidative damage marker; lower concentrations suggest reduced nucleic acid oxidation.

  6. Inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-α, IL-6, hs-CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Changes in systemic inflammation; reductions indicate attenuation of low-grade inflammatory activity.

  7. Serum Sirtuin-1(SIRT1)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Change in SIRT1 concentration (ELISA); higher levels are consistent with enhanced cellular stress-response signaling.

Other outcomes

  1. Body Weight

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Body weight measured in light clothing without shoes using a calibrated scale. Units: kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater body mass.

  2. Height

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Standing height measured without shoes using a calibrated stadiometer. Units: centimeters (cm). Height is collected primarily to compute BMI (kg/m²). Higher values indicate greater stature.

  3. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    BMI calculated as weight (kg) / height (m²) using measured weight and height. Units: kg/m². Higher values indicate higher adiposity-related risk.

  4. Waist Circumference

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Waist circumference measured at a standardized anatomical site using a non-elastic tape. Units: centimeters (cm). Higher values indicate greater central adiposity.

  5. Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    WHR calculated as waist circumference (cm) / hip circumference (cm) from standardized tape measurements. Units: ratio (unitless). Higher values indicate greater central fat distribution.

  6. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Seated systolic blood pressure measured after rest using a validated device per standardized procedure. Units: mmHg. Higher values indicate higher systolic pressure.

  7. Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Seated diastolic blood pressure measured after rest using a validated device per standardized procedure. Units: mmHg. Higher values indicate higher diastolic pressure.

  8. Lipid Profile (total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, triglycerides)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Changes indicate potential effects on atherogenic risk.

  9. Dietary Polyphenol Intake (Phenol-Explorer-based total and subclasses)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Estimated change in total/flavonoids/phenolic acids/flavanols/lignans; higher intake supports exposure to bioactive compounds.

  10. Dietary Antioxidant Quality Score (DAQS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Description: Change in Dietary Antioxidant Quality Score (DAQS), a unitless composite score ranging from 0 to 5 derived from dietary intakes of vitamins A, C, and E, and the minerals zinc and selenium. For each nutrient, participants receive 1 point if their intake is ≥ 2/3 of the age- and sex-specific Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) / Dietary Reference Intake (DRI), and 0 points otherwise. Points are summed across the 5 nutrients (minimum 0, maximum 5). Higher DAQS indicates better dietary antioxidant quality (more adequate antioxidant-related nutrient intake), whereas lower scores indicate poorer dietary antioxidant quality.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Tuba Kahraman, Research Assistant

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 530 642 70 86

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Determination of the Effect of Fermented Grape Juice Consumption on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Biomarkers and SIRT-1 Levels in Fibromyalgia Patients

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 11, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.