Istanbul University Istanbul Medical Faculty
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07000565
The primary aim of this study is to comparatively examine the effects of eye care practices using artificial tears and normal saline on superficial ocular injuries in pediatric patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Based on the findings, the study seeks to provide evidence-based contributions to nursing practices. Additionally, it aims to identify educational strategies to enhance intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice levels and to support the development of clinical care protocols.
H0: There is no difference in the effect of eye care with normal saline and artificial tears on superficial ocular injury in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.
H1:Eye care with normal saline is more effective than artificial tears in preventing superficial ocular injury in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.
H2: Eye care with artificial tears is more effective than normal saline in preventing superficial ocular injury in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me28 day–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-Having eye-related disease
Every 2 hours, the artificial tear solution was gently applied to the designated eye for 5 days. The artificial tear product (REFRESH®) contains 5.6 mg of polyvinyl alcohol and 2.4 mg of povidone per mL and is used to maintain ocular surface moisture and reduce irritation.
Every 2 hours, the saline solution(Bio-Fleks brand) was gently applied to the designated eye for 5 days.
Time frame: Everyday for 5 days after the inclusion of participant
Ocular dryness will be measured using the Schirmer test.The score was compared between the eye treated with artificial tears and the eye treated with normal saline.
Time frame: 1 time Everyday for 5 days after the inclusion of participant
Florescein testing will be used to evaluate the development of ocular surface disease
Time frame: 1 time everyday for 5 days after the inclusion of participant
Eyelid Closure Degree was evaluated by clinical observation and scoring (e.g., staining intensity and affected area). The score was compared between the eye treated with artificial tears and the eye treated with normal saline.
Marmara University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07722650
Dry Eye Syndrome (DES), Dry Eye Syndromes
Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT04067973
Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications, Obstetric Labor Complications
Nantes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07067294
Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes
Iași, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT07230548
Ocular Surface Disease, Tear Film Characteristics
Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details